Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Verifications

9 sis verification To test and evaluate the outputs of a given phase to ensure correctness and consistency with respect to the products and standards provided as input to that phase 7, 12.7 Plan for the verification of the SIS for each phase Results of the verification of the SIS for each phase [Pg.48]

10 sis functional safety assessment To investigate and arrive at a judgement on the functional safety achieved by the SIS 5 Planning for SIS functional safety assessment SIS safety requirement Results of SIS functional safety assessment [Pg.48]

3 For all safety life-cycle phases, safety planning shall take place to define the criteria, [Pg.48]

No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS [Pg.48]

1 Verification shall be performed according to the verification planning. [Pg.49]

The purpose of verification is to ensure that the activities for each safety lifecycle phase, as determined by verification planning, have, in fact, been carried out and that the required outputs of the phase, whether they be in the form of documentation, hardware or software, have been produced and are suitable for their purpose. [Pg.25]

1 lEC 61511-1 ANSI/ISA-84.00.01-2004 Part 1 (lEC 61511-1 Mod) recognizes that organizations will have their own procedures for verification and do not always require them to be carried out in the same way. Instead, the intent of this subclause is that all verification activities are planned in advance, along with any procedures, measures and techniques that are to be used. [Pg.25]

3 It is important that the results of verification are available so that it can be demonstrated that effective verification has taken place at all phases of the safety lifecycle. [Pg.25]

Another situation where verification might be required would be when one lab developed and validated the method and then wanted another lab to carry out testing on its behalf Although this can be referred to as method verification, it is usually better known under the banner of method transfer. [Pg.172]

Compendial methods must also be verified for the particular application to which they are being applied. For example, a compendial method for the analysis of codeine in pharmaceutical-grade tablets will need to be verified in order to check elements such as specificity and range if it is to be used in a forensic application. [Pg.173]

Principle 1 Analytical measurement should be made to satisfy an agreed upon requirement. [Pg.173]

Principle 2 Analytical measurement should be made using methods and equipment that have been tested to ensure they are fit for purpose. [Pg.173]

Principle 3 Staff making the measurements should be qualified and competent to undertake the task. [Pg.173]

DV refers to the series of procedures used by the product development group to ensure that a product design output meets its design input. It focuses primarily on the end of the product development cycle. It is routinely understood to mean a thorough prototype testing of the final product to ensure that it is acceptable for shipment to the customers. [Pg.274]

In the context of design control, however, DV starts when a product s specification or [Pg.274]

The ultimate requirement of any product is that it performs the function for which it is designed. With many materials the design life of the product is usually not as important as it is with plastics because of the behaviors such as creep of plastics (Chapter 2). In all cases the useful life is an important consideration whether the item is a pan for the kitchen or a bridge to handle traffic in a city. [Pg.275]

The people who use the designed product expect it to be properly designed to perform satisfactorily in the intended environment for the indicated life, without endangering any person or becoming functionally useless before the end of the predicted life. This, of course, implies that the user does not abuse the product and maintains it properly. It is the responsibility of the designer to provide the user with sufficient information so that one can intelligently use the product and properly maintain it. No product can be guaranteed to perform properly if it is abused. [Pg.275]

This type of caution approach is essential in high risk applications since only certain plastics can be used as the basis for such applications. This chapter has been concerned with the problems of the product in use under the types of environments and potential abuse that may be encountered, and how the designer can prevent premature product failure which is one of their major responsibilities. [Pg.275]

Before a given table is used for acquiring knowledge, it must be verified considering its completeness and simplicity. Therefore, first we need to know that the table contains all known design concepts (the required [Pg.178]

QP require record review, including calibration records for key measuring instruments and processing equipment. [Pg.161]

It is important to maintain a set of monitoring records that are recorded (preferably in ink) by the operator taking the measurement and at the time the measurement is taken. These records should be reviewed by a supervisor within a couple of days and before any product has left the facility. A frequent review of these records can identify possible production errors while corrections are still possible. [Pg.161]

One very important safety-related QP for a winery is labeling. Mandatory warning labels for alcohol use are required by federal law in the United States and in other jurisdictions. Because some consumers are sensitive to sulfites, an approved sulfite warning must appear on the label if sulfites are present in excess of lOmg/L. Furthermore, aU wine labels must be approved by the regulatory agencies (e.g., U.S. Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau). [Pg.161]

There are now several standards in place that support recycled content claims, developed by third-party certification bodies (e.g., INTERTEK). Some companies provide their own guarantees, while others do not provide any validation and should be treated with care. [Pg.41]

It is very difficult to evaluate the overall environmental impact of one fibre over another some information is very difficult to access or applies only to a specific region and judgments have to be made on how to weigh the different impaets of the source, production and use of the product. [Pg.41]

The factors that are generally considered in a full life-cycle assessment of a fibre include energy use, green house gas emissions, water use, land use, toxicity to humans and ecosystems, useful life of the product and final disposal. [Pg.41]


Subroutine PRDTA2. This subroutine reads the pure-component and binary parameters required for the various correlations describing the liquid and vapor phases. All input parameters are printed for verification. [Pg.217]

Subroutine VLDTA2. VLDTA2 loads the binary vapor-liquid equilibrium data to be correlated. If the data are in units other than those used internally, the correct conversions are made here. This subroutine also reads the estimated standard deviations for the measured variables and the initial parameter estimates. All input data are printed for verification. [Pg.217]

The high C/H ratio for heavy fuels and their high levels of contaminants such as sulfur, water, and sediment, tend to reduce their NHV which can reach as low as 40,000 kJ/kg by comparison to the 42,500 kJ/kg for a conventional home-heating oil. This characteristic is not found in the specifications, but it is a main factor in price negotiations for fuels in terms of cost per ton. Therefore it is subject to frequent verification. [Pg.237]

For ISO 9001 instrument annual verification, using our SELFIC system date of the verification, name of the controller, identification of the report... [Pg.282]

The realized experiments have shown the large possibilities of analysis by the eddy currents method. They allow, besides the verification of the coating and the determination of its thickness, to give an overview on the percentage of the main chemical components of the controlled samples coating by a deepened processing. [Pg.289]

Les experimentations realisees ont montre les larges possibilites d analyse par la methodes des courants de Foucault, de I evolution des divers caracteristiques metallurgiques. 11 permettent, outre la verification du revetement et la determination de son epaisseur, de dormer par un... [Pg.289]

This work presents the theoretieal results and their experimental verifications concerning two possible methods for predicting the material discontinuities shape and severity. The methods are developed for the case of the eddy current transducer with orthogonal coils, for two situations for long crack-tjfpe discontinuities, a metod based on the geometrical diffraction has been used, while in the ease of short discontinuities the holographic method is prefered. [Pg.373]

Periodical Verification of Ultrasonic Flaw Detectors According to European Standardization. [Pg.700]

The standards concerning the verification of ultrasonic equipment for non destructive testing, which are currently applicable in European countries consist in texts from different origins, such as German (DIN) British (B.S.), Italian and French (AFNOR). [Pg.700]

The working group two of technical committee 138 (TC138 WG2) is presently in charge of projects trading of the verification of ... [Pg.700]

Combined equipment consisting in flaw detector connected with probes, in the case of frequent-simplified verification (pr EN 12668-3). [Pg.700]

The Pr EN 12668-1 concerns the verification of characteristics of ultrasonic flaw detector. It is mainly applicable to portable equipment incorporating Ascan visualisation on screen, and which bandwidth is comprised between 0,5 and 15 Mhz. The project describes three levels of verification ... [Pg.701]

Manufacturer verification" describes the measurement method of flaw charaeteristics. These characteristies are reported on the data sheet delivered with the equipment. Measurements are performed on a representative sample of flaw deteetors produeed. [Pg.701]

Combined equipment" verification enables to check daily or on site the good working of flaw detector connected to probe. It is based on a set of simplified measurements. [Pg.701]

Periodical verification" enables, by annual measurements on the particular flaw detector itself, to detect any non acceptable deviation of characteristics. These verifications are also performed at the delivery of the flaw detector, or at the occasion of repair. [Pg.701]

The table given in fig (I) gives the list of parameters concerned by the periodical verification, with acceptance criteria, if applicable. [Pg.701]

The verifications can be performed by the user himself, with electronic measurement equipment described in this project. The consequences of the application of future European standard are very important since is established a mandatory verification of each particular flaw detector, at least once a year. Their verification is to be performed according to a well defined procedure of measurement, including acceptance criteria for each parameter. [Pg.701]

Figure I list of parameters to verify periodically (annual verification)... Figure I list of parameters to verify periodically (annual verification)...
The necessary material to perform annual verification of flaw detector is mainly composed of an electronic function generator, an external calibrated attenuator and an oscilloscope. [Pg.703]

Taking into account that it is necessary to make vary the flaw detector settings during the main part of the verifications, the total number of verifications is rather important. So, Technical Center for Mechanical Industries (CETIM) began the development of an electronic system enabling to benefit of the current possibilities of generation of synthesised radio frequency signals and help of personal computer for operator assistance and calculation. [Pg.703]

The prototype of verification system of ultrasonic flaw detector developed is described in the scheme given in figure 2. The verification operators performed with the system are as much automated as possible. The level of automatization is limited by the necessity of human reading of information on flaw detector screen, or other operations as manual adjustment of flaw detector settings. [Pg.703]

The system is driven by a software/working under window and rurming on personal computer. The system is based on using dialogue boxes which enable the user-software communication. The as-built system leads the operator step by step in its verification operations by indicating him the operations to perform. The system records the measurements results and stores them in the memory. [Pg.703]

Here is described the verification of one particular characteristic parameter of one flaw detector, i.e. vertical linearity. The system of verification VERAPUS is connected to peripheral equipment as indicated in figure 2. The dialogue boxes show the operator how to adjust the R.F. signals that are sent by the arbitrary generator to the flaw detector. [Pg.703]

INTEREST OF VERAPUS SYSTEM FOR PERIODICAL VERIFICATION OF FLAW DETECTORS... [Pg.704]

As described higher, the VERAPUS prototype system is designed to verify the ultrasonic flaw detectors used for non destructive testing, in the field of periodical amuially performed verifications which are described in CEN projects. [Pg.704]

Efficiency gain in verification operations thanks to computerisation of calculation operations and editing test reports. [Pg.704]

Characterisation and verification of equipment instrument CENTC 138-WG2 N176 Characterisation and verification of equipment CEN TC 13 8-WG2 pr EN 12668-3 Characterisation and verification of equipment... [Pg.704]

Figure 2 synoptic description of system for verification of ultrasonic flaw detectors... [Pg.705]

Figure 5 example of vertical linearity curve of ultrasonic flaw detector determined by the system of verification... [Pg.706]

Manual ultrasonic testing offers the advantages of low equipment cost combined with the flexibility of the human operator to provide good access and complex scanning capability. However, a total reliance on the capabilities of the ultrasonic technician to visualise the physical situation leads to a number of drawbacks, including lack of accuracy and consistency of defect size and location measurements, lack of verification that the required scan coverage has been fully achieved, and lack of consistency in flaw classification. A further disadvantage is that the ultrasonic data is not permanently recorded there is therefore no opportunity for the data to be re-examined at a later date if required. [Pg.765]

For conventional probes, acoustic verification aims at characterizing the beam pattern, beam crossing, beam angle, sensitivity, etc., which are key characteristics in the acoustic interaction between acoustic beam and defect. For array transducers, obviously, it is also a meaning to check the acoustic capabilities of the probe. That is to valid a domain (angle beam, focus, etc.) in which the probe can operate satisfactorily. [Pg.822]

The required acoustic verifications depend on what the probe is made for. If the probe is used as an angular scamiing system with a fix set of elements, then we think it is only needed to characterize the array behavior with a few selected time delay laws to isolate the angular steering capability and the foeusing capability as explained before. [Pg.824]

The automatic acquisition and analysis system we developed within the scope of the Super-Phenix steam generator tube inspection by ultrasonic arrays is a remarkable example of an exhaustive acoustic verification system. It works for every type of probe for tube inspection. [Pg.824]

We should also note that most of todays data acquisition systems are capable of producing enormous amounts of data which the traditional approach does not exploit for anything but verification of different ways to extract and combine features. To search in the. space of all such combinations is however a tremendous task. [Pg.887]

Where conformity assessment involves intervention of third party, that task is normally carried out by the notified body. The pressure equipment directive enables in addition the national authorities to authorise in their territory user inspectorates for the carrying out of conformity assessment procedures which relate to product verification. These inspectorates shall act exclusively on behalf of the group of which they are part. The placing on the market and putting into service of equipment which has undergone such assessment is however limited to the territory of the authorising Member State and to those Member States which have also proceeded to such authorisation. The equipment concerned shall therefore not bear the CE-marking. [Pg.943]

EN 230 Ultrasonic examination - Caracterization and verification of equipment- Part 1 Flaw detectors ... [Pg.956]

CTB 941.0-93 System of Accreditation for Verification and Testing Laboratory of Belarus. Basic Statements. [Pg.959]


See other pages where Verifications is mentioned: [Pg.54]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.704]    [Pg.820]    [Pg.822]    [Pg.824]    [Pg.826]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.683 , Pg.684 , Pg.685 , Pg.686 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.26 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.3 , Pg.5 , Pg.6 , Pg.9 , Pg.29 , Pg.60 , Pg.72 , Pg.78 , Pg.350 , Pg.500 , Pg.522 , Pg.538 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.12 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.132 , Pg.231 , Pg.234 , Pg.290 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.451 , Pg.453 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.7 , Pg.51 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.173 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.25 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.840 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.44 , Pg.166 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.321 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 , Pg.85 , Pg.92 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.79 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.570 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.233 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.5 , Pg.9 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.165 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.194 , Pg.198 , Pg.217 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.283 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.273 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.10 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.217 , Pg.218 , Pg.220 , Pg.222 , Pg.223 , Pg.224 , Pg.225 , Pg.226 , Pg.227 , Pg.228 , Pg.232 , Pg.234 , Pg.239 , Pg.240 , Pg.242 , Pg.245 , Pg.248 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.53 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.181 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.151 , Pg.177 , Pg.195 , Pg.220 , Pg.221 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.91 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.83 ]




SEARCH



Accountability verification

Analysis Verification

Analysis and Verification

Analytical Method Validation and Instrument Performance Verification, Edited by Chung Chow

Analytical verification

Annexes Verification Annex

Application software verification

Application verification

Assays cleaning verification

Audit verification activity

Audits verification

Balances verification

Basic Principles for Verifications and Tests

Batch verification

Buffer verification

Calibration verification

Calibration verification document

Careful Verification of Phase Diagram

Cell model experimental verification

Chemical Weapons Convention verification annex

Chemical Weapons Convention verification regime

Chemical Weapons Convention verification)

Clause 7 - Verification

Cleaning processes, verification

Cleaning verification

Cleaning verification Analytical techniques

Clinical verification

Computations graphical verification

Conformity verification

Constructive program verification

Continuing calibration verification

Continuing calibration verification standards

Control and verification

Cost of verification

Customer verification

Damage Verification and Lesion Demarcation in NER

Data Acquisition, Verification, and Monitoring

Data input verification

Data system verification report

Data verification

Design testing and verification

Design verification

Design verification plan

Development Assurance process requirements verification

Development Assurance process software verification

Development Assurance process verification planning

Development Verification

Dielectrics property verification

Dielectrics test voltage verification

Diffusion effects experimental verification

Distribution verification

EC verification

Ecological risk assessment verification

Environmental Technology Verification

Environmental Technology Verification ETV) Program

Equation verification

Evaluations of Accountability Verification Measurements

Experimental Data and Verification

Experimental Verification of Model Prediction

Experimental Verification of Theory

Experimental Verification of the Cell Model

Experimental Verification of the Theory

Experimental and Numerical Verification

Experimental verification

Experimental verification of SCS calculated rates

Experimental verification of flow mechanisms in layered systems

Experimental verification of the Maxwell distribution law

External verification

Facilities verification

Falsification verification versus

Fault Tree Analysis verification

Feed Equipment Calibration or Verification

FllnS Data Processing and Verification

Fluorescence performance verification

Forging subcategory verification data

Formal verification

Fuel verification methods

GENERAL RULES OF VERIFICATION

Gene Isolation, Detection, and Verification

Gibbs equation verification

Good manufacturing practice verification

Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation experimental verification

Homogeneity, verification

Imperfect state verification

In model verification

Independent Verification

Informed consent verification

Initial Calibration Verification Standards

Initial calibration verification

Inspection Activities for Safeguards Verification Measurements

Inspections verification

Installation verification

Installation verification example

Integrity verification

Internal Cross-Checking (Self-Verification) in NAA

International verification processes

Isolation, verification

Kinetic Model Verification

Laboratory Analysis for Nuclear Material Accountability Verifications

Laboratory-developed tests analytical verification

Limiting characteristics/quality verification levels

Liquid absorption verification

Local verification algorithm

Manufacturing Process Verification

Material Identification and Process Verification

Material Verification Program

Medical device design verification

Medical devices verification

Method validation verification studies

Method verification fundamentals

Method verification summary

Migration limits verification

Model Verification and Validation

Model verification

Modulation parameters, verification

Monitoring and Verification

Nuclear magnetic resonance structure verification

Numerical Verifications

PATH VERIFICATION

PROGRAM VERIFICATION

Parameter verification

Partial verification

Performance verification

Performance verification Karl Fisher

Pneumonia verification

Procedure Verification

Procedures design verification

Process Verification

Process concept verification

Process design verification

Process model parameter verification

Process sensors verification

Product verification

Product verification (Module

Program Quality Verification

Program Quality Verification inspection

Prohibited verification

Protection verification

Protective circuit verification

Purity verification

Qualification verification

Qualification, Validation, and Verification

Reaction mechanisms, verification

Reaction-order verification

Realization phase verification

Recalculation - Service Life Verification

Redundant Verification

Relationship between the design, safety assessment and independent verification

Results documentation verification

Rule-Based Verification of User Input

SIF VERIFICATION PROCESS

Safeguards verification measurements

Safety integrity level verification

Safety verification

Scaling relationships verification

Schedule 3 chemicals verification

Security verification

Simulated Results and Verification

Simulation for Desorption (Regeneration) and Verification

Software verification

Source data verification

Speaker verification

Standard verification

Stopping conditions, verification

Structural verification software

Structural verifications

Structure verification

Supplier verification

Supplier verification at subcontractors premises

System Safety Assessment process verification

System verification and validation

Systemic toxicants, verification

Temperature Verification

Test verification

Testing and Verification

Testing product verification phase

The Simulation for Desorption (Regeneration) and Verification

Training Quality and Verification of Completeness

Transitional verification agreements

Tree-verification stage

Unit verification (Module

United States Pharmacopeia dietary supplement verification program

User input verification

Validation training verification

Verification (cont 1997 and

Verification (cont authority of Executive Council to decide

Verification (cont met by State Party

Verification Adequacy of Mathematical Models to Real Gas Sensors

Verification Annex

Verification Capability

Verification Case for Model Setup

Verification Convention)

Verification Critical Size

Verification During Development

Verification Information System

Verification Liquidation and Evaporation

Verification Methods for Robustness in RP-HPLC

Verification accomplishment

Verification activities

Verification activities - meaning

Verification activities, determination

Verification and Limitations of LSW Theory

Verification and Review of Standards

Verification and validation

Verification data study

Verification defined

Verification definition

Verification deliverables

Verification direct

Verification forms

Verification functional

Verification in industrial conditions

Verification matrix

Verification meaning

Verification methods

Verification of Completion

Verification of Design

Verification of Gibbs formula

Verification of Hypotheses

Verification of Model Parameters Prior to Process Simulation

Verification of Numerical Models

Verification of Pure Component Parameters

Verification of Safety Following Debonding

Verification of Scaling Laws for Spouting Beds

Verification of Selected Grade

Verification of a Buffer

Verification of an operator-initiated SIF

Verification of compliance

Verification of data

Verification of implementation

Verification of methods

Verification of protonic conduction

Verification of results

Verification of scaling relationships

Verification of supplies for double-blind clinical studies

Verification of the Hypothesis

Verification of the Marcus Inverted Region

Verification of the Method on Thick Rubber Samples

Verification of the Model

Verification of the Standard

Verification of the Stress-Optical Rule

Verification of the Theory Under Equilibrium Conditions

Verification of the Third Law

Verification of the method

Verification planning

Verification problems

Verification process, software

Verification protocol

Verification reports

Verification requirements

Verification requirements - meaning

Verification resources

Verification responsible party

Verification results

Verification results Language

Verification reviews

Verification rules

Verification specifications

Verification status

Verification system

Verification system development

Verification techniques

Verification validation

Verification with a second method

Verification within testing

Verifications and Tests

Verifications and falsifications of traditional beliefs

Verifications, transition states

Viscosity Model Verification

Vision verification system

Visual inspection, cleaning verification

Volumetric Verification

Weapons verification costs

Weapons verification plans

© 2024 chempedia.info