Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Buffer verification

As this kind of verification of classical J-diffusion theory is crucial, the remarkable agreement obtained sounds rather convincing. From this point of view any additional experimental treatment of nitrogen is very important. A vast bulk of data was recently obtained by Jameson et al. [270] for pure nitrogen and several buffer solutions. This study repeats the gas measurements of [81] with improved experimental accuracy. Although in [270] Ti was measured, instead of T2 in [81], at 150 amagat and 300 K and at high densities both times coincide within the limits of experimental accuracy. [Pg.221]

The experimental verification of published results with newer buffers, more sensitive instriments or better reagents has led to a significant improvement, and often simplification of the method (32). Consequently, newly described methods should always be checked out point by point before using them routinely. [Pg.190]

Chemicals quality of deionized water and chemicals for buffer preparation and rinsing, standards for quantification and selectivity verification, test samples, correct transport and storage conditions... [Pg.118]

Fig. 31.3. Rapid electrochemical verification of PCR amphfication of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC 14028 with the doubly labeled primer set IS200, showing an increasing amount of IS200 doubly labeled amplicon (from 2.8 to 75.4 fmol). The negative PCR control is also shown. 60 pg AntiDig-HRP and 6.2 x 106 magnetic beads were used. Other experimental details are medium, phosphate buffer 0.1 mol L-1, KC1 0.1 mol L 1, pH 7.0 mediator, hydroquinone 1.81 mmol L-1 substrate, H202 4.90 mmol L 1 applied potential = —0.1V (vs. Ag/AgCl). All data are given as average +SD, n — 3. Fig. 31.3. Rapid electrochemical verification of PCR amphfication of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC 14028 with the doubly labeled primer set IS200, showing an increasing amount of IS200 doubly labeled amplicon (from 2.8 to 75.4 fmol). The negative PCR control is also shown. 60 pg AntiDig-HRP and 6.2 x 106 magnetic beads were used. Other experimental details are medium, phosphate buffer 0.1 mol L-1, KC1 0.1 mol L 1, pH 7.0 mediator, hydroquinone 1.81 mmol L-1 substrate, H202 4.90 mmol L 1 applied potential = —0.1V (vs. Ag/AgCl). All data are given as average +SD, n — 3.
Robustness is the capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate, variations in method parameters. In a typical HPLC validation this exercise would include minor variations in flow rate or pH of the buffer. When considering cleaning verification, this parameter may be extended to extraction time of the swabs, pH of extraction solvent, etc. However, it is fairly uncommon to evaluate such parameters due to the above-mentioned variability that may be found in swab methods. [Pg.360]

Experimental verification of scheme (7) and of equations (12) and (13) can be carried out in two ways Either the amine is used directly as a buffer or a small amount of the amine is added to a buffer. In the latter case, the analytical concentration of the amine is kept constant, and the reaction rate dependence on pH follows a plot corresponding to a dissociation curve with the inflexion at When amine is used as buffer and hence is in excess over the a, -unsaturated ketone, it proved useful to keep the free amine concentration constant and to change the concentration of the ammonium form only. The rate constants for these runs are pH-independent, but this type of measurement is restricted to the range pH = (pJf ) ... [Pg.24]

When proteinoids were heated in buffer at pH 6.2 or 6.8, loss of catalytic activity was observed. The extent of loss ranged from 95 to 11% (Table II). Those proteinoids that initially showed higher levels of activity relative to histidine were the most affected by the heat treatment. After heating, the level of activity was comparable to that of the equivalent amount of histidine, or to that of mineral acid hydrolysates of the polymer. Under similar conditions, a-chymotrypsin was 97% inactivated. The fact that the control tests on L-histidine or A -carbo-benzoxy-L-histidine showed no effect is consistent with the inference that inactivation is due to disruption of a macromolecular conformation. Copolymers prepared from only aspartic acid and histidine were also active on NPA and were inactivated by the heat treatment. The percentages of inactivation ranged from 62 to 19. Polymers prepared and processed under aseptic conditions were both catalytically active and subject to inactivation by heat. These experiments were performed as routine verification that the respective phenomena do not result from the presence, and subsequent denaturation, of contaminating microbial enzymes. [Pg.384]

The experimental verification of the EQrrE mechanism was demonstrated on the reduction of 4-nitrosophenol [86]. Using LSV technique on a HMDE with the scan rate 0.02-30 V s a well defined peak was observed (at -0.08 V vs. SCE in buffered, pH 4.9, solvent mixture of water with ethanol). The reaction scheme... [Pg.203]


See other pages where Buffer verification is mentioned: [Pg.305]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.1282]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.28]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.167 ]




SEARCH



Verification

Verification of a Buffer

© 2024 chempedia.info