Verification forms

The results of corrosion surveys are received by the Surveyor in an agreed format using Forms TMl - TM8, preferably with the LR software freely issued to the approved firms. The report will highlight any areas where corrosion has gone beyond the permitted maximum diminution, which may be as low as 15% of the nominal thickness for a single item, and will also identify areas of "substantial corrosion T.e., any in excess of 75% of the permitted maximum. Corrosion in excess of that permitted means that the item has to be replaced. Any areas of corrosion deemed to be "substantial" are recorded for annual inspection. The Surveyor will review the completed report for verification and confirmation of the completeness of the thickness survey. 

The highly resolved velocity profile can be mapped in the vicinity of solid boundaries such as the walls of a room and in the entire enclosure, providing relevant data for CFD boundary conditions. These data form a basis for verification of CFD results and for improvement of CFD codes. 

Do the design controls ensure that design outputs are documented and in a form suitable for procurement, manufacture, verification, and installation ... 

Verification of some characteristics may only be possible by calculation rather than by test, inspection, or demonstration. In such cases the design calculations should be checked either by being repeated by someone else or by performing the calculations by an alternative method. When this form of verification is used the margins of error permitted should be specified in the verification plan. 

Your inspection and test records or verification records should be of two forms one which indicates what inspections and tests have been carried out and the other which indicates the results of such inspections and test. They may be merged into one record but when parameters need to be recorded it is often cleaner to separate the progress record from the technical record. Your procedures, quality plan, or product specifications should also indicate what measurements have to be recorded. 

However, these requirements go further than merely controlling the devices used for measurement. They address the measurements themselves, the selection of the devices for measurement and also apply to devices which create product features, if they are used for product verification purposes. If you rely on jigs, tools, fixtures, templates, patterns, etc. to form shapes or other characteristics and have no other means of verifying the shape achieved, these devices become a means of verification. If you use software to control equipment, simulate the environment or operational conditions, or carry out tests and you rely on that software doing what it is supposed to do, without any separate means of checking the result, the quality of such software becomes critical to product verification. In fact the requirements apply to metrology as a whole rather than being limited to the equipment that is used to obtain the measurement and therefore a more appropriate title of the section would be Control of measurements . 

There are two systems used for maintaining the accuracy and integrity of measuring devices a calibration system and a verification system. The calibration system determines the accuracy of measurement and the verification system determines the integrity of the device. If accuracy is important then the device should be included in the calibration system. If accuracy is not an issue but the device s form, properties, or function is important then it should be included in the verification system. You need to decide the system in which your devices are to be placed under control and identify them accordingly. 

In many cases, however, the ortho isomer is the predominant product, and it is the meta para ratio which is close to the statistical value, in reactions both on benzenoid compounds and on pyri-dine. " There has been no satisfactory explanation of this feature of the reaction. One theory, which lacks verification, is that the radical first forms a complex with the aromatic compound at the position of greatest electron density that this is invariably cither the substituent or the position ortho to the substituent, depending on whether the substituent is electron-attracting or -releasing and that when the preliminary complex collapses to the tr-complex, the new bond is most likely to be formed at the ortho position.For heterocyclic compounds such as pyridine it is possible that the phenyl radical complexes with the nitrogen atom and that a simple electronic reorganization forms the tj-complex at the 2-position. 

Some organic compounds can be in solution with water and the mixture may still be a flammable mixture. The vapors above these mixtures such as ethanol, methanol, or acetone can form flammable mixtures with air. Bodurtha [39] and Albaugh and Pratt [47] discuss the use of Raoult s law (activity coefficients) in evaluating the effects. Figures 7-52A and B illustrate the vapor-liquid data for ethyl alcohol and the flash point of various concentrations, the shaded area of flammability limits, and the UEL. Note that some of the plots are calculated and bear experimental data verification. 

Pharmaceuticals for injection must be presented in a sterile form. Sterility may be achieved by filtration through 0.22 pm filters under aseptic conditions, or by steam, dry heat, radiation or gas sterilisation methods, which may be applied to packaged products. Irrespective of the method, the process must be validated and monitored to assure its effectiveness. As discussed in Chapter 2, this is an example of a process that cannot be assured by verification testing because of its destructive nature. 

Typical questions that need to be answered are whether the CQP-based system is well designed (validity), whether activities (procedures, instructions, completion of registration forms) related to the monitoring system are executed properly (verification), and whether conditions (checking temperatures, concentrations, and other quality attributes) of processes are really achieved (production process verification). 

Audits of each phase of the study should include personnel training, preparation of collection forms, application calibration, each sample collection procedure, sample transport, each type of chemical analysis, data recording, data entry, data verification and data storage. Data collection in the field is often tedious if automated logging devices are not in place. To ensure data integrity, the paper and ink used for field studies should be waterproof. Each data collection form should contain appropriate locations for information detailing the time and location of sample collection, sample transport and sample analysis. Data collection forms should be stored in an orderly fashion in a secure location immediately upon return of field teams from the field at the end of each day. It is also important for data quality for studies to collect necessary field data seven days per week when required. In our experience, poor study quality is likely when field sample and data collection do not proceed on weekends. 

Each data point must be transferred from data sheets into spreadsheets or databases. Verification of each datum should be performed by an individual who did not enter the data being verified. Audits of each phase of the study should be performed (i.e. preparation of collection forms, application calibration, each type of sample collection, sample transport, each type of chemical analysis, data recording, data entry, data verification and data storage). 

For /-Advantage, more extensive field site verification is conducted. A field site notebook is used which verifies every step in the data entry process. Following this procedure, a form is completed and returned to American Agricultural Services, Inc. (AASI), where the form is checked to ensure that verification was properly conducted and documented. This verification takes approximately 2 h to perform. Documentation and verification may require a visit to AASI to confirm that the validation process has been completed and is adequately documented. 

---