GENERAL RULES OF VERIFICATION

The CWC (1) makes extensive reference to S A in its Annex on Implementation and Verification (Verification Annex) . First in part II, under General Rules of Verification, but also in later sections that describe verification activities for particular types of inspections or inspectable facilities as shown in Table 1. The full wording of the respective provisions is included in Annex 1. 

The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) provides sampling and analysis as a tool for verification. General procedures to use sampling and analysis are outlined under the general rules of verification in the Verification Annex (VA) Part II paragraph 52-58, special provisions concerning different types of inspections are given in various parts of the VA. 

The CWC describes the general responsibilities for sampling, sample transport to the off-site DLs, confidentiality of samples, sample analysis, and compilation of the report of analysis results of laboratories (1). The Verification Annex of the CWC, Part II, General Rules of Verification, paragraph E, Conduct of Inspections, and subparagraph Collection, handling and analysis of samples, and paragraphs 52-58 read as follows ... 

GENERAL RULES OF VERIFICATION 10.1 Visa procedures for OPCW inspectors and inspection assistants... 

The general rules for verification (Verification Annex, Part II, paragraphs 52-54) describe sample taking (sampling, sample collection) and analysis. By way of example, sampling and analysis shall be undertaken to check for the absence of undeclared scheduled chemicals during inspections under... 

To clarify things neither type tests and verifications nor routine tests are the point of this chapter, but inspection and maintenance procedures after installation and before or during service. These procedures shall be done -and this is a general rule - by qualified personnel, who are experienced in the various types of explosion protection, installation practices and rules and the principles of area classification. 

Eurocode 3 design of steel structures, part 1-1 general rules and rules for buildings Games CJ, Fragkopoulos KA (2010) Strategy for numerical verification of steel structures at the ultimate limit state. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(l-2) 225-255... 

Special cases and examples. The conditions hitherto introduced are no restrictive, and can be shown to be satisfied in most problems of application. But it must be confessed that some of them are often rather difficult to verify rigorously. It would be desirable to replace them by simpler conditions, especially Condition C) which is rather specific and not adapted to verification. But as we failed in doing so without sacrificing generality, we shall assume them in the following according to necessity, and, as a rule, leave their verification to indivi dual cases. 

The Army has stated that while it is destroying the stockpile, its primary concern is the protection of the health and safety of the workers, the public, and the environment. After the Army conducted operational verification tests at the Johnston Atoll facility from 1990 through 1993, independent oversight contractors, for both EPA and the Army, concluded in their reports that the baseline incineration equipment generally operated safely and within environmental rules and regulations. 

Large-scale experimental releases of fission product activity are clearly ruled out because of the implications on the safety of the public, described in Section V,F, as are also the smaller scale releases referred to earlier in Section V. Therefore, for verification of our conclusions we have to rely on limited experience from those few accidents that have occurred and that have released fission products (see Section I,D), but much more on our store of knowledge of all the factors involved, i.e., types of reactor accidents (Section II) through fission product release (Section III) and dispersion of a release in the atmosphere (Section IV), to analysis of the radiation and radiobiological hazards and risks to exposed members of the population. In view of these several steps involved in the estimation of hazard, it is reassuring that the many different authors who have written on the topie reach conclusions which are generally similar and differ only in limited areas. 

Common sense has led to simple rules that are the result of the long history of humankind activity that history is constantly evolving, and the activities are always under diversification and specialization. These rules are deeply rooted in humankind, but they do not have absolute value, as they might require verification of compliance with a specific problem. Eor example, humankind has always been led to distinguish between good and bad, to make comparisons and then performance rankings in this way, different materials are ranked, and scales of resistance are devised for different environments. These scales are not absolute rather they have relative value, related to a specific problem, and they may be generally valid but not necessarily always true. 

The perspectives start with the development of an antomated tool for a verification of the CPN structure in order to he acceptable for the backward reachabihty analysis. The theory advances include the generalization of transformation rules to composed functions. The second path to explore is the possible of presence of non deterministic time constraints for the transition firing. The study of stochastic firing vectors is also considered as a potential snhject of interest. 

Asa general principle governing the rules for inspections at mixed plant sites, it is understood that an inspection wUl count under the relevant Part of the Verification Annex it was initiated under and wUl be limited to the provisions of that Part. If an inspection mission was to be conducted under two (or more) Parts of the Verification Annex, that mission would count as two (or more) sequential or simultaneous inspections and the provisions of the respective Parts, including those on notification times, would apply. 

With respect to the reimbursement of States Parties for expenses incurred by them on authorisation of the OPCW in accordance with paragraph 26 of Part II of the Annex on Implementation and Verification to the Convention, the Director-General shall effect such reimbursements in accordance with these Regulations, and as provided for in the Financial Rules issued imder this Regulation. 

The cleaning and post-renovation cleaning verification could be performed by any properly qualified individuals, without regard to whether they are employees of the general contractor or a subcontractor. However, all contractors involved in the disturbance of lead-based paint, or who perform work within the work area established for the containment of lead dust and debris, are responsible for compliance with this final rule, regardless of any agreements the contractors may have made among themselves. 

---