Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Verification responsible party

Each document that is prepared for a validation program must be approved by all responsible parties. Documents that require data collection must also be approved after the completion of all required tests and verifications. [Pg.645]

Make a decision, based on the action level, with regard to treatment, disposal, site remediation and/or removal of pollutants, health risk or environmental impact, responsible party identification, enforcement actions, cleanup verification. [Pg.90]

Program Element Initiation Date Completion Date Location of Activity Responsible Party Verification of Completion... [Pg.201]

New companies are verified three years after joining CCPA using a comprehensive Responsible Care-in-Place Verification protocol, with subsequent verifications following a more focused protocol. Verification reports are made available to their local communities and other interested parties by the verified company. [Pg.278]

EMS three sites in the USA received third party validation as part of the CMA s management system verification scheme. A yes score has been awarded since there is a stated intention that all six plants in the USA will have achieved full implementation of the six Responsible Care management codes by the end of 1999, and that globally PPG are nearing full implemention . [Pg.293]

It is the responsibility of any laboratory to demonstrate the validity of the method used. Referring to some third party validation is sufficient if there is a statement that the laboratory can follow the method to ensure the maintenance of the validation. This requires some measure of verification to show, for example, that the analyst in the laboratory can achieve the repeatability precision indicated in the method. [Pg.3981]

Safety-related controllers in conjunction with safety or fail safe I/O modules are used for critical and hazardous applications where an incident can result in danger to persons, and/or damage to plant and environment. These safety-related controllers can work with the safety-related distributed I/O system (may be with internal verification for input or output via safety switches as described in Clause 5.0.1—safe PLC approach), or directly with fail-safe transmitters cormected via the fieldbus. These controllers are supposed to detect faults both in the process and their own internal (self-diagnosis) to the system. It is the duty of the same to automatically set the plant to a safe state in the event of a fault. These controllers need to work in multitasking environment — may be in a mix of standard BPCS or safety-related applications, if integrated operation is permitted by the end-user. The programs of BPCS and SIS must be functionally separate, so that faults in BPCS applications have no effect on safety-related applications and vice versa. Special tasks with very short response times can also be implemented [14]. For safety applications controllers and I/O modules need to individually certified by third party and to comply SIL 2/SIL 3 (as the case may be — SIL 4 only for nuclear application) as per lEC 61508. For safety-related applications a few restrictions are followed such as ... [Pg.675]

Significantly, a state that is party to the Convention has primary responsibility for the disposal and clean-up of chemical weapons abandoned on another state party s territory. As the verification annex of the CWC states, [the] Abandoning State Party shall provide all necessary financial, technical, expert, facility as well as other resources. The Territorial State Party shall provide appropriate cooperation. This is the clause that, for example, obUges Japan to survey the remains of chemical weapons its armies left behind in China and pay the associated costs of disposal. [Pg.180]

Further considering that timely responses by States Parties to such requests for clarification promote the effective and efficient implementation of the verification regime of the Convention ... [Pg.166]

Bearing in mind the special responsibility of States Parties with regard to transfers of Schedule 2 or Schedule 3 chemicals to States not party to the Convention, and recalling in this respect the obligation under paragraph 31 of Part VII of the Verification Annex, which came into effect on 29 April 2000, that Schedule 2 chemicals shall only be transferred to or received from States... [Pg.206]

In accordance with paragraph 60 of Part II of the Verification Annex, Upon completion of an inspection the inspection team shall meet with representatives of the inspected State Party and the personnel responsible for the inspection site to review the preliminary findings of... [Pg.378]

The responsibility of the head of the escort team includes representing [State Party] vis-a-vis the head of the inspection team and the persons subject to international verification. [Pg.396]

The Third Review Conference noted that the OPCW has established a verification system that meets the requirements of the Convention. It further noted that the verification system should continue to be improved in a manner consistent with the Convention in response to advances in science and technology, taking into consideration, as appropriate, the SAB s advice to the Director-General, as circulated to the Council. The Third Review Conference also recognised the continued need for the OPCW to have up-to-date verification technologies at its disposal, and encouraged the Secretariat to continue to work with States Parties that wish to familiarise themselves with approved verification equipment. [Pg.544]

A well-defined and documented programme of testing on the computer system supplier s premises before shipment to site of all items connected together or simulated, carried out in the presence of the other involved parties will do much to eliminate any anomalies. However, this does not reduce in any way the need for both hardware and software to be subjected to extensive and detailed verification and development on site. It is vital that for both shop and site testing, procedures, format of quality records, basis of interpretation and criteria for acceptance as well as the responsibilities of the various parties to be fully defined well in advance. Modifications to hardware and software should be logged and... [Pg.198]


See other pages where Verification responsible party is mentioned: [Pg.129]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.60]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.129 ]




SEARCH



PARTI

Party

Responsible parties

Verification

© 2024 chempedia.info