Process sensors verification

Process modeling and simulation ate nevertheless extremely important tools in the design and evaluation of process control strategies for separation processes. There is a strong need, however, for better process mo ls for a variety of separations as well as process data with which to confirm tiiese models. Confidence in complex process models, especially those that can be used to study process dynamics, can come only from experimental verification of these models. This will require more sophisticated process sensors than those commonly available for temperature, pressure, pH, and differential pressure. Direct, reliable measurement of stream composition, viscosity, turbidity, conductivity, and so on is important not only for process model verification but also for actual process control applications. Other probes, which could be used to provide a better estimate of the state of the system, are needed to contribute to the understanding of the process in the same time frame as that of changes occurring in the process. 

The elements of calibration and validation of sensor systems are thus composed of all of the physical attributes that make up sensor systems, the functional aspects that determine the operational capability of these systems, and finally the parameters that determine the frequency of verification, the sensor system variables that determine the operational range, and the process/sensor standards that will be used during the verification phases of the sensor systems. 

Radiometers for three-dimensional cure are used for simultaneous multipoint measurements, for setup and process verification of the lamp system. They can be used with UV lamps mounted on a fixed bank or a robotic arm. The collected exposure data (irradiance and total UV energy) are displayed on a computer for each sensor position. A SDCure radiometer is shown in Figure 9.7, and an example of a screen display from a 3D radiometer in Figure 9.8. 

The comprehensive analysis of physical, chemical, and electrochemical processes occurring in the solid electrolyte gas sensors, allows verifying the adequacy of mathematical models to the real gas sensors. Processing the results of multiple experimental measurements of the gas sensors consists in elucidation of the type of experimental data distribution, evaluation of the parameters of the established distribution, and verification of the adequacy of the mathematical model to the real sensor. 

Body motion processing via wearable wireless sensor networks, especially with electrogoniometer studies, nowadays draws special attention. Most of the current prosthetic researches use dedicated ambulatory low-cost resistive measurement system together with vision-based measurements for validations and verifications [61]. 

Because advances in modeling and prediction of damage will need verification, there is an urgent need to bring monitoring to the state where it can operate in a range of environments to sense corrosion, not just in the easiest environments. Moreover, sensors in the chemical process stream can be used for real-time moni-... 

Discussion of the Development. Let us point out that the proposed approach is also applicable to formal modelling and verification of DPUs that are not connected to a sensor directly (e.g., Data Processing Unitk in Fig. 1). In this case, we can assume that the DPU operates in the presence of a permanent sensor fault and, therefore, only rehes on the data received from the other units. The phases related to sensor reading and processing then could be excluded from the model of such a DPU. In general, DPUs might not be necessarily connected to displays but rather send the produced data to other (sub)systems. 

---