Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tests, toxicity

For the sample search on aquatic toxicity of atrazine, 1459 results were found. An excerpt on the daphnia acute aquatic toxicity tests (EC50. LC.50) is prc.scnted in Figure 5-33. [Pg.278]

Acute inhalation exposure of rats to 200,000 ppm VF for 30 minutes or more produced weak anaesthesia and no deaths (90). In rats VF is only slightly metabolized at a rate of one-fifth that of vinyl chloride (91—95). An extensive program of toxicity testing of vinyl fluoride is ia progress (96,97). [Pg.381]

The importance of hydrolysis potential, ie, whether moisture or water is present, is illustrated by the following example. In the normal dermal toxicity test, namely dry product on dry animal skin, sodium borohydride was found to be nontoxic under the classification of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act. Furthermore, it was not a skin sensitizer. But on moist skin, severe irritation and bums resulted. [Pg.306]

Daylight fluorescent pigments (qv) are considered to be nontoxic. Since they are combinations of polymers and dyestuffs, the combined effect of the ingredients must be taken into account when considering the net toxic effect of these materials. Table 5 gives results of laboratory animal toxicity tests of standard modified melamine—formaldehyde-type pigments, the Day-Glo A Series, and the products recommended for plastic mol ding, Day-Glo Z-series. [Pg.304]

Table 5. Results of Laboratory Animal Toxicity Tests... Table 5. Results of Laboratory Animal Toxicity Tests...
In heavy-metal analysis of the same pigments, metals found were present in only trace amounts. The data Hsted place the products tested in the category of nontoxic materials. The Radiant Color Co. has conducted toxicity tests on its own products similar to the A-Series and has found them to be nontoxic. Heavy metals were found only in trace amounts in these tests. [Pg.304]

R. Patrick, Report of Toxicity Tests, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pa., 1951. [Pg.506]

Aquatic Toxicity. The standard tests to measure the effect of substances on the aquatic environment are designed to deal with those that are reasonably soluble ia water. Unfortunately this is a disadvantage for the primary phthalates because they have a very low water solubiUty (ca 50 p.g/L) and this can lead to erroneous test results. The most common problem is seen ia toxicity tests on daphnia where the poorly water-soluble substance forms a thin film on the water surface within which the daphnia become entrapped and die. These deaths are clearly not due to the toxicity of the substance but due to unsuitable test design. [Pg.133]

Based on tests with laboratory animals, aniline may cause cancer. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology (CUT) conducted lifetime rodent feeding studies, and both studies found tumors of the spleen at high dosage (100 —300 mg/kg pet day of aniline chloride). CUT found no tumors at the 10—30 mg/kg per day feeding rates. The latter value is equivalent to a human 8-h inhalation level of 17—50 ppm aniline vapor. In a short term (10-d) inhalation toxicity test by Du Pont, a no-effect level of 17 ppm aniline vapor was found for rats. At high levels (47—87 ppm), there were blood-related effects which were largely reversible within a 13-d recovery period (70). [Pg.233]

Celanese Corp., Tange Finding Toxicity Test on n-Propanol, Industrial Hygiene Foundation of America, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa., July 1962. [Pg.121]

Threshold limit value (TLV) not estabUshed by ACGIH. Value given is an estimate of a comparable iadex based on limited or incomplete toxicity testing made by chemical producers. [Pg.62]

The health effects of sorbic acid and sorbates have been reviewed (165—167). The extremely low toxicity of sorbic acid enhances its desirabiHty as a food preservative. The oral LD q for sorbic acid in rats is 7—10 g/kg body weight compared to 5 g/kg for sodium chloride (165—169). In subacute and chronic toxicity tests in rats, 5% sorbic acid in the diet results in no abnormal effects after 90 days or lifetime feeding studies. A level of 10% in rat diets results in a slight enlargement of the Hver, kidneys, and thyroid gland (170). This same dietary level fed to mice also resulted in an increase in Hver and kidney weight... [Pg.287]

There are many guidelines that need to be followed and which are common to all types of toxicity testing, the most important of which are as follows ... [Pg.235]

Safety is assessed by subjecting the antioxidant to a series of animal toxicity tests, eg, oral, inhalation, eye, and skin tests. Mutagenicity tests are also carried out to determine possible or potential carcinogenicity. Stabilizers are being granulated and Hquid products are receiving greater acceptance to minimize the inhalation of dust and to improve flow characteristics. [Pg.234]

The toxicity of a few boric acid esters has been summarized (30). In general the toxicities are directiy related to the toxicity of the alcohol or phenol produced on hydrolysis. Methyl borate has an oral rat LD q of 6.14 mL/kg in a range finding test (31) and the percutaneous LD q for the rabbit of 1.98 mL/kg. In eadier work (32), the oral LD q for the rat was 2.82 mL/kg the intraperitoneal LD q was 3.2 mL/kg. It has been shown that the mouse is more susceptible to these compounds than the rat. Methyl borate was found to be moderately irritating in an ocular toxicity test using rabbits (31,32) but only mildly irritating to skin (31). [Pg.216]

The data from some single-dosage oral toxicity tests, expressed as LD q, are reported in Table 4. The values reported on the order of 1 g/kg or greater indicate a low acute oral toxicity. In animals, continued ingestion of chlorobenzenes over a long time can cause kidney and Hver damage. [Pg.48]

Both acute and chronic toxicity testing of the treated effluent on daphnia shrimp and fathead minnows have indicated that the effluent is completely suitable for discharge into receiving waters with no adverse impact (42). [Pg.276]

Mice are utilized for testing antiseptics for appHcation to cuts, wounds, and incisions (339). The test bacteria, type 1 pneumococcus and hemolytic streptococcus, ate appHed to the taHs of anaesthetized mice. The tip of the taH is then dipped into the antiseptic for 2 min, after which one-half inch of the taH is removed and inserted into the peritoneal cavity and the incision is closed. If after 10 days the animals survive, the product is considered satisfactory for use as a skin antiseptic. The blood of dead animals is sampled and streaked on blood agar for confirmation of infection from the test bacteria as the cause of death. Since lack of toxicity is another requirement of a product to be appHed to wounds, this test has been combined with a toxicity test (340). [Pg.140]

Physicochemical properties requked include melting/boiling point, vapor pressure, solubiUty, and flammabiUty/explosion characteristics. The toxicological studies include acute toxicity tests, oral, inhalation, and dermal skin and eye kritation skin sensiti2ation subacute toxicity, oral, inhalation, and dermal and mutagenicity tests. In vitro reverse mutation assay (Ames test) on Salmonella typhimurium and/or E.scherichia coli and mammalian cytogenic test. In vivo mouse micronucleus test. [Pg.301]

EinaHy, the ecotoxicological studies, designed to assess the impact of the substance on the environment, embrace acute toxicity tests to fish and Daphnia, and a battery of tests for the biodegradabiUty of the substance and its biological oxygen demand characteristics. [Pg.301]

Carotenoids have two general characteristics of importance to the food iadustry they are not pH sensitive ia the normal 2—7 range found ia foods, and they are not affected by vitamin C, making them especially important for beverages. They are more expensive than synthetic food dyes and have a limited color range. In their natural environment they are quite stable, but they become more labile when heated or when they are ia solution. Under those conditions, there is a tendency for the trans-double bonds to isomerize to the cis-stmcture with a subsequent loss of color iatensity. The results of controlled tolerance and toxicity tests, usiag pure carotenoids, iadicate that they are perfecdy safe as food colors (132). [Pg.404]

Biological sui veys should be used together with whole-effluent and ambient toxicity testing, and chemical-specific analyses to assess the attainment/nonattainment of designated aquatic hfe uses in state water-quahty standards. ... [Pg.2161]

The full extent of the toxicity of pesticides to aquatic life is not known. Although chronic toxicity testing is required for new substances, little is known about the long-term effects of older pesticides. Also, very little is known about the toxicity and occurrence of the products formed when pesticides break down (metabolites) or the many non-pesticidal additives (co-formulants and adjuvants) used in pesticide formulations. However, the future is looking brighter. New modelling techniques, EQS development, and the involvement of the NRA in the pesticide registration process, coupled with the development of newer, less persistent pesticides with lower dose rates, all should help to reduce the risk of pesticide pollution. [Pg.56]

In vitro cytotoxicity assays using isolated cells have been applied intermittently to cyanobacterial toxicity testing over several years." Cells investigated for suitability in cyanobacterial toxin assays include primary liver cells (hepatocytes) isolated from rodents and fish, established permanent mammalian cell lines, including hepatocytes, fibroblasts and cancerous cells, and erythrocytes. Earlier work suggested that extracts from toxic cyanobacteria disrupted cells of established lines and erythrocytes," but studies with purified microcystins revealed no alterations in structure or ion transport in fibroblasts or erythrocytes,... [Pg.115]

Corrective Action Application In Massachusetts, a municipal wastewater treatment plant receives a number of wastestreams containing heavy metals from local industries. When tested, the dewatered sludge failed the EP toxicity test. In order to permit landfill disposal of the sludge, solidification processes were examined. A soluble, silicate-based system, developed by Chemfix, was ultimately selected which produced a product whose leachate passed the EP toxicity test (Sullivan, 1984). [Pg.182]


See other pages where Tests, toxicity is mentioned: [Pg.270]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.2161]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.163]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.262 , Pg.274 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.488 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.262 , Pg.274 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.72 , Pg.85 , Pg.86 , Pg.87 , Pg.88 , Pg.89 , Pg.90 , Pg.91 , Pg.92 , Pg.93 , Pg.94 , Pg.95 , Pg.100 , Pg.101 , Pg.112 , Pg.113 , Pg.116 , Pg.152 , Pg.154 , Pg.285 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.540 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.122 ]




SEARCH



A simple test to determine toxicity using bacteria

Abnormal toxicity tests

Accuracy, toxicity tests

Acute Toxicity Testing in Drug Safety Evaluation

Acute Toxicity Tests with Aquatic Vertebrates and Macroinvertebrates

Acute and Subchronic Toxicity Tests

Acute toxicity testing purpose

Acute toxicity tests, discussion

Acute toxicity tests, higher animals

Advantages and disadvantages of toxicity testing

Algal 96-H growth toxicity test

American cockroaches toxicity tests

An Introduction to Toxicity Testing

Analytical chemistry-toxicity testing

Animal Toxicity Test

Aquatic toxicity test methods

Aquatic toxicity testing

Avian toxicity tests

Battery toxicity testing

Biocompatibility systemic toxicity testing

Biological toxicity tests

Block copolymers toxicity tests

Bone Marrow Toxicity Testing During Drug Development

Bone marrow toxicity test during drug development

Can a Genetic Toxicity Profile Inform In Vivo Testing Strategies

Chimpanzees toxicity testing

Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity Testing

Chronic toxicity testing

Chronic toxicity tests

Classification of Toxicity Tests

Clinical tests chronic toxicity studies

Clinical trials toxicity testing

Cockroaches toxicity tests

Colorant testing toxicity data

Computerized Listing of Chemicals being Tested for Toxic Effects

Control animals, repeat-dose toxicity testing

Control mortality, toxicity testing

Crustacean toxicity test

Cyanobacterial toxicity testing

Daphnia 48-H acute toxicity test

Design Parameters for Single-Species Toxicity Tests

Designing a Toxicity Test

Developmental toxicity animal tests

Diazinon toxicity tests

Distilled water toxicity test methods

Dosage factors, toxicity testing

Drug development bone marrow toxicity test

Duration, toxicity tests

Earthworm acute toxicity test

Earthworm toxicity test

Echinocardium cordatum and validation of its use in marine toxicity testing for environmental risk assessment

Ecotoxicology, toxicity tests

Embryonic stem cells developmental toxicity tests

Extraction procedure toxicity test

Fertility studies reproductive/developmental toxicity testing

Fire test methods smoke toxicity

Fish eggs, toxicity testing

Flammability testing toxic gases

From toxicity tests

Fumigants toxicity tests

Genetic toxicity testing

Genetic toxicity testing approaches

Genetic toxicity testing development

Genetic toxicity testing predictive ability

Genetic toxicity tests

Growth factors toxicity testing

Health issues toxicity test methods

Heptachlor toxicity tests

Higher animals, toxicity tests using

In situ toxicity testing

In vivo toxicity testing

Information Derived from Toxicity Testing

Inhalation toxicity testing

Inhalation toxicity tests, acute

Insect tests, toxicity evaluation

Interferons toxicity testing

Invertebrates, aquatic toxicity testing

Involved in Toxicity Testing

Laboratory toxicity tests

Leachate Preparation for Toxicity Screening Test

Lethality, acute toxicity tests

Local toxicity tests

Metabolite toxicity testing

Micro-scale toxicity tests

Microalgal toxicity tests

Minimal acute toxicity test

Monitoring Sediment Quality Using Toxicity Tests as Primary Tools for any Risk Assessment

Mortality range, toxicity tests

Multispecies Toxicity Tests

National Research Council Toxicity Testing reports

Ocular Toxicity Tests

Oral toxicity tests

Oral toxicity tests, acute

Organ toxicity tests

Other organisms used for toxicity testing

Permethrin toxicity tests

Pesticides toxicity testing

Poly acute toxicity test

Postnatal development studies reproductive/developmental toxicity testing

Preclinical toxicity testing

Prenatal development studies reproductive/developmental toxicity testing

Rabbits reproductive/developmental toxicity testing

References for Toxicity Testing and Interpretation

Repeat-dose toxicity testing

Repeated-Dose Dermal Toxicity Test (21- and 28-Day Study)

Reproduction toxicity tests

Reproduction, toxic/adverse effects testing

Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test

Reproductive Toxicity Testing

Reproductive and developmental toxicity test

Rodents standard toxicity tests

Routes of Exposure and Toxicity Tests

Sample Acute Toxicity Tests and Commonly Used Species

Sample Chronic Toxicity Tests and Commonly Used Species

Sample In Vitro Toxicity Tests

Sample Subchronic Toxicity Tests and Commonly Used Species

Selective toxicity tests

Single-species toxicity tests

Special toxicity testing

Specialized toxicity tests

Species choice, toxicity testing

Spiked sediment toxicity test

Subacute toxicity tests

Subchronic toxicity test

Subchronic toxicity testing

Subject Toxicity testing

Sublethal toxic effects testing

Sublethal toxicity tests

Summary of Design Guidelines for Multispecies Toxicity Tests

Survey and Review of Typical Toxicity Test Methods

Systemic toxicity testing

Target animal safety toxicity testing

Terrestrial Vertebrate Toxicity Tests

Test Guidelines for Animal Toxicity Studies

Test atmospheres of toxic substances

Test of toxicity

Testing acute toxicity

Thalidomide toxicity testing

The Cornerstone of Risk Assessment Toxicity Testing in Animals

The Future of Toxicity Testing

The Nature of Multispecies Toxicity Tests

Three-brood renewal toxicity test

Tissue toxicity tests

Topical application insect toxicity tests

Toxic Substances Control Act Test

Toxic Substances Control Act Test Submissions

Toxic Substances Control Act testing

Toxic Toxicity test

Toxic Toxicity test

Toxic agents testing

Toxic substances, test atmospheres

Toxicants tests

Toxicity Testing in Single Cells

Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century

Toxicity additive product testing

Toxicity biodegradability tests

Toxicity early life-stage tests

Toxicity evaluation testing procedures

Toxicity evaluation tests with insects

Toxicity genotoxicity testing

Toxicity mammalian mutagenicity test

Toxicity microorganism testing

Toxicity neurotoxicity testing

Toxicity studies carcinogenicity testing

Toxicity studies immunotoxicity testing

Toxicity studies tissue cross-reactivity testing

Toxicity test designs

Toxicity test designs body weights

Toxicity test designs control animals

Toxicity test designs dose selection

Toxicity test designs false positives

Toxicity test designs pathology

Toxicity test designs study duration

Toxicity test methods

Toxicity test methods extraction solution

Toxicity test report

Toxicity testing

Toxicity testing Sixth Amendment

Toxicity testing basis

Toxicity testing cadmium

Toxicity testing concentration methods

Toxicity testing conversion factors

Toxicity testing copper

Toxicity testing costs

Toxicity testing evolution

Toxicity testing for

Toxicity testing invertebrates

Toxicity testing mercury

Toxicity testing methanol

Toxicity testing oncogenicity studies

Toxicity testing organic chemicals

Toxicity testing polymer industry

Toxicity testing potential human adverse effects predicted

Toxicity testing preclinical safety pharmacology

Toxicity testing recommended

Toxicity testing reproduction

Toxicity testing requirements, summary

Toxicity testing risk benefits

Toxicity testing safety pharmacology

Toxicity testing single-dose

Toxicity testing types

Toxicity testing with algae

Toxicity testing with bacteria

Toxicity testing with fish

Toxicity testing with plants

Toxicity testing with protozoans

Toxicity testing, aromatic

Toxicity testing, finished products

Toxicity testing, methodology

Toxicity testing, microarray analysis

Toxicity testing, normal variations

Toxicity testing, repeat-dose duration

Toxicity testing, repeat-dose interpretation

Toxicity testing, single-dose interpretation

Toxicity testing, single-dose study design

Toxicity testing, systematic

Toxicity testing, vaccines

Toxicity tests and bioassays

Toxicity tests bacterial inhibiting

Toxicity tests classification

Toxicity tests costs

Toxicity tests dietary

Toxicity tests group size

Toxicity tests health

Toxicity tests line

Toxicity tests metabolizers

Toxicity tests product development

Toxicity tests reproductive

Toxicity tests shortcomings

Toxicity tests species

Toxicity tests standardized aquatic microcosm

Toxicity tests survey

Toxicity tests toxicant

Toxicity tests within a triad of techniques

Toxicity tests, acute

Toxicity tests, importance

Transgenic animals toxicity testing

Vaccine production toxicity testing

Water testing toxic pollutants

Watertox toxicity testing battery

Whole-effluent toxicity testing

Zebra fish toxicity testing

© 2024 chempedia.info