Toxicity tests line

Toxicity tests will tell whether chemicals, waste, surface water, sediments or soil exhibit an adverse effect to the test organism. However, with this information it will not be possible to identify the toxicant causing the observed effect. 

Risk characterization for the toxicity line of evidence begins by determining whether the tests show significant toxicity. Toxicity is not significant if the effects relative to controls are less than 20% (e.g. less than 20% mortality) (Suter, 1996) and the effects are not statistically significantly different from the controls. Effects are considered significant if  

If no significant toxicity is found, the risk characterization consists of determining the likelihood that the result constitutes a false negative. If significant toxicity occurs in the tests, the risk characterization should describe the nature and magnitude of the effects and the consistency of effects among tests conducted with different species in the same medium (Suter, 1996). 

If significant toxicity is found at one site, then the relationship of toxicity to exposure must be characterized. This may be done by analyzing the relation between toxicity and concentration of chemicals in the media. When sources of toxicants have been identified and tests have been performed on dilution series, the transport and fate of toxicity can be modeled like that of individual chemicals (Suter, 1996). Nevertheless, combined toxic effects of pollutant mixtures are not considered with this approach. 

---

In vitro cytotoxicity assays using isolated cells have been applied intermittently to cyanobacterial toxicity testing over several years." Cells investigated for suitability in cyanobacterial toxin assays include primary liver cells (hepatocytes) isolated from rodents and fish, established permanent mammalian cell lines, including hepatocytes, fibroblasts and cancerous cells, and erythrocytes. Earlier work suggested that extracts from toxic cyanobacteria disrupted cells of established lines and erythrocytes," but studies with purified microcystins revealed no alterations in structure or ion transport in fibroblasts or erythrocytes,... 

Fig. 15-13 Organism mortality as a function of SEM/AVS ratio for a hypothetical sediment. This figure is generalized from results typical of sediment toxicity tests (e.g., Hansen et al, 1996). Organisms evaluated in such tests include amphipods and poly-chaetes. The symbols represent different sediments. The vertical line at 10° is positioned at an SEM/AVS ratio of 1.0 the horizontal line at 24% represents the limit of toxicity, that is, mortality 24% is defined as not the consequence of toxicity.

Many of these properties would obviously limit applicability of non-continuous cell lines in the industrial-scale production of recombinant proteins. However, such cell types are routinely cultured for research purposes, toxicity testing, etc. 

The Clonetics cell line from Cambrex Bio Science represents a cultured human corneal epithelial model (order no. CMS-2015 Cambrex Bio Science, Walkersville, MD). The culture model was generated by isolation of cells from normal human corneal tissues. The cells were then infected with an amphotropic recombinant retrovirus containing HPV-16 E6/E7 genes to extend the useful cell life span. The Clonetics cell model is a very recent entry into the immortalized corneal cell line field, but it has been proved to be useful for toxicity testing as well as in vitro drug permeation studies so far. Because of its very recent introduction, further examinations have to be undertaken to... 

Thus far, a wide array of useful cell culture models of the corneal epithelium has been established. Many of these cell culture models focus on toxicity testing and ocular irritation, but some cell layer models for drug permeation studies are also available. Indispensable for successful drug penetration testing is a cell layer that exhibits a tight epithelial barrier. This latter requirement of tight barrier properties disqualifies some of the models that were established as substitutes for the Draize test. At least two cell lines are available for pharmaceutical studies and some newer models may qualify as a useful tool, once they are characterized for their barrier properties. 

Before this topic is left behind, it should be noted that statistical significance is by no means the only consideration in interpretation of toxicity test results. If, in our particular case, the pathologist were to inform us that the brain lesion observed was extremely unusual or rare, we should certainly hesitate to dismiss our concerns because of lack of statistical significance. The toxicologist needs equally to understand biological significance, and, in this case, would almost certainly pursue other lines of investigation (perhaps an ADME study to determine if the pesticide reaches the brain, or a toxicity test in other species) to determine whether the effect was truly caused by the chemical. 

Mucous membrane tissue lining of nose, mouth, esophagus, stomach, and intestine. Multigeneration Study A toxicity test in which at least three generations of the test organism are exposed to die chemical being assessed. Exposure is usually continuous. 

The Sediment Quality Triad (SQT) is an effects-based conceptual approach that can be used to assess and determine the status of contaminated sediments based on biology (laboratory and/or in situ toxicity tests), chemistry (chemical identification and quantification), and ecology (community structure and/or function). It provides a means for comparing three different lines of evidence (LOE) and arriving at a weight of evidence (WOE) determination regarding the risk posed by contaminated sediments. Effectively, each LOE comprises an independent assessment of hazard combined and integrated, they provide an assessment of risk. 

The results of the subchronic inhalation toxicity study may be summarized in tabular form. These results may be based on the same lines as subchronic oral toxicity test in addition to experimental conditions used for the inhalation toxicity test. 

Biological activity can be evaluated by using in vitro techniques to determine which effects of the product are related to clinical activity. Due to species specificity of biotechnology derived products, it is necessary to select relevant species for testing. Mammalian cell lines can be used to predict in vivo activity and the relative sensitivity of various species including man. Such studies are useful to determine receptor occupancy, receptor affinity pharmacological aspects, and for the selection of adequate animal species for toxicity testing. 

LOE Line of evidence. A set of data and associated analysis that can be used, alone or in combination with other lines of evidence, to estimate risks. Each line of evidence is qualitatively different from any others used in the risk characterization. In ecotoxicological assessments, the most commonly used lines of evidence are based on 1) biological surveys, 2) toxicity tests of contaminated media, and 3) toxicity tests of individual chemicals. 

A variety of in vitro toxicity tests have been developed to model the effects of toxins on living cells or tissues. In these tests, a carrier medium (such as fetal bovine serum) containing given concentrations, or doses, of a particular toxin are added to cell cultures (cell lines). Various indicators of toxicity, cell morphology transformation, or cell prohferation are then measured after specified periods of time. The cell types used in a particular study can be chosen to approximate the types of cells that would be affected during acmal exposure, such as respiratory cells or tissues. Toxicity indicators include, for example, measures of the percent of viable cells remaining at the end of the test (compared to a control line with no added toxin), and the concentrations various cytokines or other cytoplasmic enzymes induced from the cells by the toxin. Uncertainties with the in vitro toxicity tests include how comparable their results are to those of in vivo toxicity tests, and how well they reproduce actual physiological conditions and processes in the human body (Johnson and Mossman, 2001). 

After an appropriate growth period (e.g. 4-6 days, depending on cell line, for serum batch testing), determine the endpoint (as below). For toxicity tests, incubate cells in 100 xl of medium for 24 h prior to addition of test substance (at twice the final concentration in 100 xl of medium). Incubation with toxic substance prior to endpoint measurement is usually for 6 days. For measurement of Trypan blue exclusion, trypsinize cells with 0.5% trypsin (Gibco) and... 

There is normally no direct correlation that can be tied up between brine shrimp lethality and cell line toxicity tests or to special types of bioactivities. Exceptions have however been... 

The class of relatively unreactive chemicals which act, at least in acute toxicity tests, as narcotics [3] is the best known class of compounds for which several QSARs are established. Those chemicals exert the so-called base-line toxicity. Studies from KSnemann [3] and Veith et al. [91] have shown that external effect concentrations such as LC50s or NOECs for these chemicals depend on the octanol-water partition coefficient according to the following equation ... 

---