Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Toxicity additive product testing

Uncured resins are skin sensitizers and contact should be avoided, as well as breathing the vapor, mist, or dust. Novolak-based pulverized products generally contain hexamethylenetetramine, which may cause rashes and dermatitis. Phenolic molding compounds and pulverized phenolic adhesives must be controlled as potentially explosive dusts. In addition, they contain irritating or toxic additives. ASTM test method D4639-86 (1996) describes the method for volative content in phenolic resins. [Pg.5523]

In Japan, all these pathways to reduce ease the burden of introducing new excipients are more complex. If not already approved as a pharmaceutical excipient in Japan, food additives for oral administration or cosmetic substances for external application in drug formulations requires that they be treated as new excipients. For excipients already used in orally or intravenously administered products, a change to an externally applied product necessitates additional safety testing. Studies include acute and subacute toxicity (including adsorption through the skin) and local irritation investigations. ... [Pg.2775]

From a practical point of view, there are several additional criteria that the ideal test should meet. Alternatives to current in vivo test systems basically should be designed to evaluate the observed toxic response in a manner as closely predictive of the outcome of interest in humans as possible. In addition, the test should be fast enough so that the turnaround time for a given test chemical is reasonable for the intended purpose (very rapid for a screen and timely for a definitive test). The speed of the test and the ability to conduct tests on several chemicals simultaneously will determine the overall productivity. The test should be inexpensive so that it is economically competitive with current testing practices. Finally, the technology should be easily transferred from one laboratory to another without excessive capital investment (relative to the value of the test performed) or the need for special skills for test implementation. [Pg.2621]

Acute Toxicity. There is a clear requirement for single-dose studies by relevant routes of exposure to determine lethal toxicity (LD50 or timed LC50), and sublethal injuring potential with dose-response relationships, including a no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL). In addition to testing the pure material, it is advisable to study the technical material to include any impurities that may be in the material used for munitions, and also determine the influence of variants on acute toxicity for example, solvents, additives, and the effect of pyrotechnic decomposition products. [Pg.352]

In addition to the other tests, this test can be requested when the risk is considered as being high (Qho or Qhc >50). It aims to provide information to assess the potential toxicity of product residues on crops for foraging bees. This test should allow us to establish the 50 percent Lethal Time (LT50) expressed in hours. This value gives us an idea of the time period during which the residues remain toxic to bees. [Pg.50]

Analyses of black cohosh products associated with liver toxicity in Canada found that several products were not black cohosh but instead a closely related species (Painter et al. 2010). An analysis of products on the American market indicated that 3 of 11 products tested contained Asian species of Actaea in place of or in addition to Actaea racemosa (Jiang et al. 2006). [Pg.16]

The full extent of the toxicity of pesticides to aquatic life is not known. Although chronic toxicity testing is required for new substances, little is known about the long-term effects of older pesticides. Also, very little is known about the toxicity and occurrence of the products formed when pesticides break down (metabolites) or the many non-pesticidal additives (co-formulants and adjuvants) used in pesticide formulations. However, the future is looking brighter. New modelling techniques, EQS development, and the involvement of the NRA in the pesticide registration process, coupled with the development of newer, less persistent pesticides with lower dose rates, all should help to reduce the risk of pesticide pollution. [Pg.56]

In five pilot plants that can be used to simulate the route of anionic surfactants from the consumer via the effluent purification plant to the receiving water, possible toxic effects of residual surfactant content and breakdown products of the secondary alkanesulfonates were investigated [102]. As indicators of the effects on living organisms of the effluent in the receiving water, flora and fauna that are frequently encountered in the p-mesosaprobic zone were used as models. The embryo-larval test was also employed as an additional method for the detection of toxic compounds in the water. [Pg.213]

Apart from routine quality control actions, additive analysis is often called upon in relation to testing additive effectiveness as well as in connection with food packaging and medical plastics, where the identities and levels of potentially toxic substances must be accurately known and controlled. Food contact plastics are regulated by maximum concentrations allowable in the plastic, which applies to residual monomers and processing aids as well as additives [64-66]. Analytical measurements provide not only a method of quality control but also a means of establishing the loss of stabilisers as a function of material processing and product ageing. [Pg.14]

As mentioned previously (and discussed in detail in Sec. IX), contact lens products have specific guidelines that focus on compatibility with the contact lens and biocompatibility with the cornea and conjunctiva [75], These solutions are viewed as new medical devices and require testing with the contact lenses with which they are to be used. Tests include a 21-day ocular study in rabbits and employ the appropriate types of contact lenses with which they are to be used and may include the other solutions that might be used with the lens. Additional tests to evaluate cytotoxicity potential, acute toxicity, sensitization potential (allergenicity), and risks specific to the preparation are also required [75-77], These tests are sufficient to meet requirements in the majority of countries, though testing requirements for Japan are currently much more extensive. [Pg.427]


See other pages where Toxicity additive product testing is mentioned: [Pg.666]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.874]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.796]    [Pg.1508]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.39]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.323 ]




SEARCH



1,2-addition product

Additive production

Product testing

Product tests

Production test

Production testing

Tested products

Toxic Toxicity test

Toxic products

Toxicity additive

Toxicity products

Toxicity test

Toxicity, additivity

© 2024 chempedia.info