Receiving waters

Lead concentrations typical of those found in raw and treated sewage effluent are indicated by the data for the Oxford Sewage Treatment Works (Table 3.10) [6]. Tlie concentrations are highly variable, especially in the final effluent. In this particular case, the final effluent concentrations are only just above background levels in the receiving water. 

Concentrations of lead in natural waters are generally very low, 0.001-0.003 mgdm , rising in waters draining areas of lead mineralization up to 0.05-0.02 Table 3.11 Average peak concentrations of lead in storm runoff waters, [18]. 

Land cover type % Impervious area Average peak lead concentration (mg dm ) 

It is a common misconception that the concentration of lead in a particular discharge will be representative of its significance as a source of pollution. It is thus worth re-emphasizing (see also Section 3.3.1) that the effect on a receiving water will depend upon the mass discharge rate of the lead (mg s ), which is a function of both concentration (mg dm ) and the flow rate of the discharge (dm s ), i.e. mass discharge rate (mg s ) = concentration (mg dmT ) X flow 

Lead concentrations in ocean waters are generally lower than those of inland waters. In deep ocean waters, concentrations fall as low as 0.000004 mg dm [22], rising in coastal waters which receive surface runoff to values in excess of 0.005 mg dm [21]. Concentrations of lead measured in the coastal waters off the west coast of England and Wales are shown in Fig. 3.3. They reflect the impact of runoff from mineralized areas, as well as that due to industrial and domestic discharges. It should be noted that the concentrations are similar in the areas receiving runoff from both industrial and natural sources of lead. 

---

This equation indicates that every molecule of urea requires 9/2 molecules of oxygen for complete oxidation. The oxygen required for the reactions depletes the receiving water of oxygen, causing the death of aquatic life. 

Tertiary treatment. Tertiary or polishing treatment prepares the aqueous waste for final discharge. The final quality of the effluent depends on the nature and flow of the receiving water. Table 11.3 gives an indication of the final quality required. ... 

Water Quality Standards. Water quaUty standards are usually based on one of two primary criteria, stream standards or effluent standards. Stream standards are based on dilution requirements for the receiving water quaUty based on a threshold value of specific pollutants or a beneficial use of the water. Effluent standards are based on the concentration of pollutants that can be discharged or on the degree of treatment required. 

Although stream standards are the most reaUstic in light of the use of the assimilative capacity of the receiving water, they are difficult to administer and control in an expanding industrial and urban area. The equitable allocation of poUutional loads for many industrial and municipal complexes also poses pohtical and economic difficulties. A stream standard based on minimum dissolved oxygen at low stream flow intuitively implies a minimum degree of treatment. One variation of stream standards is the specification of a maximum concentration of a poUutant (ie, the BOD) in the stream after mixing at a specified low flow condition. 

Note that the maintenance of water quaUty and hence stream standards are not static, but subject to change with the municipal and industrial environment. For example, as the carbonaceous organic load is removed by treatment, the detrimental effect of nitrification in the receiving water increases. Eutrophication may also become a serious problem in some cases. These considerations require an upgrading of the required degree of treatment. 

Effluent standards are based on the maximum concentration of a poUutant (mg/L) or the maximum load (lb/day) discharged to a receiving water. These standards can be related to a stream classification. 

The modem approach to wastewater treatment, protection of the oxygen resources of the receiving waters, requires that all aspects of the problem be addressed, ie, the systems approach. The Ohio River Sanitation Commission (ORSANCO) is an excellent example of basin-wide management dealing with situations that involve several poUtical entities. This approach has been adopted in several other regions. 

Hazards of Production. In most zinc mines, zinc is present as the sulfide and coexists with other minerals, especiaHy lead, copper, and cadmium. Therefore, the escape of zinc from mines and mills is accompanied by these other often more toxic materials. Mining and concentrating, usuaHy by flotations, does not present any unusual hazards to personnel. Atmospheric poHution is of Httle consequence at mine sites, but considerable effort is required to flocculate and settle fine ore particles, which would find their way into receiving waters. 

Both acute and chronic toxicity testing of the treated effluent on daphnia shrimp and fathead minnows have indicated that the effluent is completely suitable for discharge into receiving waters with no adverse impact (42). 

The bioavailability, and hence the toxicity, of metal depends on the physical and chemical form of the metal, which in turn depends on the chemical characteristics of the surrounding water. The dissolved form of the metal is generally viewed as more bioavailable and therefore more toxic than the particulate form. Particiilate matter and dissolved organic matter can bind the metal, making it less bioavailable. What is not well known or documented is the various chemical transformations that occur both within the effluent stream and when the effluent reaches and mixes with the receiving water. Metal that is not bioavailable in the effluent may become bioavailable under ambient chemical conditions. 

The Action plans will also include options for controlling nutrient inputs in the upstream catchments of affected stillwaters. These are likely to include reduction of nutrients from both point and diffuse sources and a range of different combinations aimed at reaching the target concentrations of nutrients required to achieve control in the receiving waters. 

Is there a concern that untreated wastewater effluent could be creating adverse impacts to public health or the environment If yes, was an impact assessment (for example, through a paper study or actual monitoring of the receiving water) conducted to eliminate the concerns or to evaluate the impacts ... 

If the drum may occasionally receive water, caustic or similar aqueous streams, which would create problems in receiving facilities if pumped out with the hydrocarbon, then means of separate drainage should be be included. This may consist of a connection to the sewer from the bottom of the boot or in the case of sour water, a connection off the pumpout pump discharge routed to sour water facilities or other suitable disposal. 

The latest outsourcing development is for giant services companies to bundle their services together to provide a one-stop shop. A services contractor may provide some form of permanently installed utilities plant under a build, own, operate, maintain program (BOOM), so that the customer merely pays a contract fee to receive water, steam, electricity, and other services. Thus, the entire responsibility for the provision of utilities can be passed to a contractor, and not merely at one facility, but globally ... 

Pressure aerators employ a vertical, volcanic lava media-filled PV and receive water at pump pressure. The water is mixed with blown air and fed to the bottom of the bed. Excess air is discharged through an air valve to atmosphere, and the aerated water is collected at the top of the column and then fed to a sand filter for removal of insoluble ferric hydroxide. 

---