Interacting Surface

C. Liquid-Surface Interactions Surface Changes and Autophobicity... 

In the complex with Gpy the two phosducin domains do not interact with each other, instead they wrap around the edge and the top side of the p propeller, to form an extensive interaction surface (Figure 13.17). The N-terminal domain of phosducin interacts with all of the top loops of the p propeller including part of the surface of Cpythat interacts with Gq (Figures 13.15 and 13.17). This interface between phosducin s N-terminal domain and Gpy clearly precludes association of the latter with Gq. 

The shape of the interaction area between lysozyme and the CDR loops of the antibody is easily distinguished from the hapten-binding crevice. The interaction extends over a large area with maximum dimensions of about 20 X 30 A (Figure 15.15). The interaction surface is irregular but relatively flat, with small protuberances and depressions that are complementary in the antigen and the antibody. Residues from all six CDR loops contribute to the... 

Figure 15.15 Space-filling representation of a complex between lysozyme (green) and the Fab fragment of a monoclonal antilysozyme (blue and yellow). The Fab fragment and the antigen (lysozyme) have been separated in this diagram, and their combining surfaces are viewed end-on. Atoms that ate in contact in the complex are colored red both in Fab and lysozyme, except Gin 121 in lysozyme, which is violet. The diagram illustrates the large size of the interaction surfaces. (After A.G. Amit et al.. Science 233 747-753, 1986 courtesy of R. Poljak.)...

From the point of view of solute interaction with the structure of the surface, it is now very complex indeed. In contrast to the less polar or dispersive solvents, the character of the interactive surface will be modified dramatically as the concentration of the polar solvent ranges from 0 to l%w/v. However, above l%w/v, the surface will be modified more subtly, allowing a more controlled adjustment of the interactive nature of the surface It would appear that multi-layer adsorption would also be feasible. For example, the second layer of ethyl acetate might have an absorbed layer of the dispersive solvent n-heptane on it. However, any subsequent solvent layers that may be generated will be situated further and further from the silica surface and are likely to be very weakly held and sparse in nature. Under such circumstances their presence, if in fact real, may have little impact on solute retention. 

J. Zhuo, S. Redner, H. Park. Critical behavior of an interacting surface reaction model. J Phys A (Math Gen) 26 4197-4213, 1993. 

The subunits of an oligomeric protein typically fold into apparently independent globular conformations and then interact with other subunits. The particular surfaces at which protein subunits interact are similar in nature to the interiors of the individual subunits. These interfaces are closely packed and involve both polar and hydrophobic interactions. Interacting surfaces must therefore possess complementary arrangements of polar and hydrophobic groups. 

Figure 7.87 shows a AG -concentration diagram for Fe(j,-Zn( ). It was constructed from the experimental data shown in Table 7.37. The method of construction is described elsewhere. Figure 7.87 can now be used, by applying the constraints imposed by the tangency rule, to explain why in Fig. 7.88a and b, where the chemical potentials (shown in the diagram) of zinc vapour varied between 0 and - 1 - 81 kJ molthe total interaction surface layer consisted of T, T, 6, and flayers in Fig. 7.88c at a chemical potential only slightly lower ( — 2-11 kJmol ) only T and T, layers were present whilst at -2-55 kJ mol only a F outermost layer was formed. 

Convection requires a fluid, either liquid or gaseous, which is free to move between the hot and cold bodies. This mode of heat transfer is very complex and depends firstly on whether the flow of fluid is natural , i.e. caused by thermal currents set up in the fluid as it expands, or forced by fans or pumps. Other parameters are the density, specific heat capacity and viscosity of the fluid and the shape of the interacting surface. 

The two examples of sample preparation for the analysis of trace material in liquid matrixes are typical of those met in the analytical laboratory. They are dealt with in two quite different ways one uses the now well established cartridge extraction technique which is the most common the other uses a unique type of stationary phase which separates simultaneously on two different principles. Firstly, due to its design it can exclude large molecules from the interacting surface secondly, small molecules that can penetrate to the retentive surface can be separated by dispersive interactions. The two examples given will be the determination of trimethoprim in blood serum and the determination of herbicides in pond water. 

The analysis demonstrates the elegant use of a very specific type of column packing. As a result, there is no sample preparation, so after the serum has been filtered or centrifuged, which is a precautionary measure to protect the apparatus, 10 p.1 of serum is injected directly on to the column. The separation obtained is shown in figure 13. The stationary phase, as described by Supelco, was a silica based material with a polymeric surface containing dispersive areas surrounded by a polar network. Small molecules can penetrate the polar network and interact with the dispersive areas and be retained, whereas the larger molecules, such as proteins, cannot reach the interactive surface and are thus rapidly eluted from the column. The chemical nature of the material is not clear, but it can be assumed that the dispersive surface where interaction with the small molecules can take place probably contains hydrocarbon chains like a reversed phase. 

The column used was 25 cm long, 4.6 mm in diameter, and packed with silica gel particle (diameter 5 pm) giving an maximum efficiency at the optimum velocity of 25,000 theoretical plates. The mobile phase consisted of 76% v/v n-hexane and 24% v/v 2-propyl alcohol at a flow-rate of 1.0 ml/min. The steroid hormones are mostly weakly polar and thus, on silica gel, will be separated primarily on a basis of polarity. The silica, however, was heavily deactivated by a relatively high concentration of the moderator 2-propyl alcohol and thus the interacting surface would be covered with isopropanol molecules. Whether the interaction is by sorption or displacement is difficult to predict. It is likely that the early peaks interacted by sorption and the late peaks by possibly by displacement. 

In many cases of traditional tribology, friction and wear are regarded as the results of surface failure of bulk materials, the solid surface has severe wear loss under high load. Therefore, the mechanical properties of bulk material are important in traditional friction and wear. However, in microscale friction and wear, the applied load on the interactional surface is light and the contact area is also under millimeter or even micrometer scale, such as the slider of the magnetic head whose mass is less than 10 mg and the size is in micrometer scale. Under this situation, the physical and chemical properties of the interactional surface are more important than the mechanical properties of bulk material. Figure 1 shows the general differences between macro and micro scale friction and wear. 

In 1995, one of the authors (A.K.) introduced the state of a molecule embedded in a perfect conductor as an alternative reference state, which is almost as clean and simple as the vacuum state. In this state the conductor screens all long-range Coulomb interactions by polarization charges on the molecular interaction surface. Thus, we have a different reference state of noninteracting molecules. This state may be considered as the North Pole of our globe. Due to its computational accessibility by quantum chemical calculations combined with the conductor-like screening model (COSMO) [21] we will denote this as the COSMO state. 

Transition metals such as iron can catalyze oxidation reactions in aqueous solution, which are known to cause modification of amino acid side chains and damage to polypeptide backbones (see Chapter 1, Section 1.1 Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1984 Kim et al., 1985 Tabor and Richardson, 1987). These reactions can oxidize thiols, create aldehydes and other carbonyls on certain amino acids, and even cleave peptide bonds. The purposeful use of metal-catalyzed oxidation in the study of protein interactions has been done to map interaction surfaces or identify which regions of biomolecules are in contact during specific affinity binding events. 

---