Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interactions between surfaces

Wanless E J and Christenson H K 1994 Interaction between surfaces in ethanol adsorption, capillary condensation, and solvation forces J. Chem. Rhys. 101 4260-7... [Pg.1749]

Israelachvili J N, McGuiggan P and Horn R 1992 Basic physics of interactions between surfaces in dry, humid, and aqueous environments 1st Int. Symp. on Semiconductor Waver Bondings Science, Technology and Applications (Pennington, NJ Electrochemical Society)... [Pg.1749]

Surfaces can be characterized using scaiming probe microscopies (see section B1.19). In addition, by attaching a colloidal particle to tire tip of an atomic force microscope, colloidal interactions can be probed as well [27]. Interactions between surfaces can be studied using tire surface force apparatus (see section B1.20). This also helps one to understand tire interactions between colloidal particles. [Pg.2672]

The first application is related to tire molecular interaction between surface-liirked DNA and pollutants or dmgs, in order to develop a simple device for rapid screening of toxic compounds or better to try to quantify the genotoxicity of a specific sample. [Pg.15]

By plotting Hugoniot curves in the pressure-particle velocity plane (P-u diagrams), a number of interactions between surfaces, shocks, and rarefactions were solved graphically. Also, the equation for entropy on the Hugoniot was expanded in terms of specific volume to show that the Hugoniot and isentrope for a material is the same in the limit of small strains. Finally, the Riemann function was derived and used to define the Riemann Invarient. [Pg.39]

Israelachvili and his colleagues have used the SEA to study the interactions between surface layers of surfactant and of other molecules representing functionalised polymer chains, adhesion promoters or additives. Typically a monolayer of the molecule concerned is deposited onto cleaved mica sheets. The values of surface energies obtained from the JKR equation (Eq. 18) throw some interesting light on the nature and roughness of surface layers in contact. [Pg.341]

P. Peyla, A. Vallat, C. Misbah, H. Muller-Krumbhaar. Elastic interaction between surface defects in thin layers. Phys Rev Lett 82 1 1, 1999. [Pg.919]

The surface forces apparatus (SEA) can measure the interaction forces between two surfaces through a liquid [10,11]. The SEA consists of two curved, molecularly smooth mica surfaces made from sheets with a thickness of a few micrometers. These sheets are glued to quartz cylindrical lenses ( 10-mm radius of curvature) and mounted with then-axes perpendicular to each other. The distance is measured by a Fabry-Perot optical technique using multiple beam interference fringes. The distance resolution is 1-2 A and the force sensitivity is about 10 nN. With the SEA many fundamental interactions between surfaces in aqueous solutions and nonaqueous liquids have been identified and quantified. These include the van der Waals and electrostatic double-layer forces, oscillatory forces, repulsive hydration forces, attractive hydrophobic forces, steric interactions involving polymeric systems, and capillary and adhesion forces. Although cleaved mica is the most commonly used substrate material in the SEA, it can also be coated with thin films of materials with different chemical and physical properties [12]. [Pg.246]

Nir S (1977) Van der Waals interactions between surfaces of biological interest. Prog Surf Sci 8 1-58... [Pg.122]

Both sand and silt surfaces are dominated by oxygen and its lone pairs of electrons in p orbitals. In some instances, broken surfaces may also have silicon-hybridized sp3 orbitals4 available for bonding. Comparison of sand, silt, and clay reveals the surface area of sand and silt to be low and the interaction between surface bonding orbitals and components in the surrounding medium relatively weak. [Pg.75]

Catalyst characterization by the relative value of slopes, a , is most useful when parallel trends in the properties of the catalysts, measured by other probes, chemical or physical, are discovered. Examples are the estimation of acid strength of the surface sites or the estimation of energy of interaction between surface atoms on the basis of shifts in spectra. All of the quantities used for comparison must be intensive, that is, they must express some form of energy or be proportional to energy. [Pg.162]

I. Vakarelski, A. Toritani, M. Nakayama, and Higashitani Effects of Particle Deformability on Interaction Between Surfaces in Solutions. Langmuir 19, 110 (2003). [Pg.103]

Emission infrared spectroscopy is used for thin films and opaque polymers. The sample is heated so that energy is emitted. The sample acts as the radiation source and the emitted radiation is recorded giving spectra similar to those of classical FTIR. In some cases, IR frequencies vary because of differences in the structures at different depths and interactions between surface and interior emissions. [Pg.426]

Studies on fundamental interactions between surfaces extend across physics, chemistry, materials science, and a variety of other disciplines. With a force sensitivity on the order of a few pico-Newtons, AFMs are excellent tools for probing these fundamental force interactions. Force measurements in water revealed the benefits of AFM imaging in this environment due to the lower tip-sample forces. Some of the most interesting force measurements have also been performed with samples under liquids where the environment can be quickly changed to adjust the concentration of various chemical components. In liquids, electrostatic forces between dissolved ions and other charged groups play an important role in determining the forces sensed by an AFM cantilever. [Pg.136]

In TIRF protein adsorption experiments, it is desirable to correlate the intensity of excited fluorescence with excess protein concentration at the interface. Such an adsorbed layer is often in equilibrium with bulk-nonadsorbed protein molecules which are also situated inside the evanescent volume and thus contributing to the overall fluorescence. Various calibration schemes were proposed, using external nonadsorbing standards40,154 , internal standard in a form of protein solution together with a type of evanescent energy distribution calculation 154), and independent calibration of protein surface excess 155). Once the collected fluorescence intensity is correlated with the amount of adsorbed protein, TIRF can be applied in the study of various interactions between surface and protein. [Pg.51]

Fig. 10. Schematic representation of interaction between surfaces with graft chains... Fig. 10. Schematic representation of interaction between surfaces with graft chains...
Fig. 3 Photoresponsive polymer surface sensitive to pH and light. Adsorption and release of cytochrome c triggered by pH (b, c, and d) release of the polymer layer and cytochrome c by breaking the host-guest interactions between surface-tethered azo dye and cyclodextrin via light irradiation (a and d). The molecular structure on the right represents the host-guest complexa-tion of the azo dye with the cyclodextrin-modified poly(acrylic acid). Reprinted, with permission, from [68]. Copyright (2009) Wiley Interscience... Fig. 3 Photoresponsive polymer surface sensitive to pH and light. Adsorption and release of cytochrome c triggered by pH (b, c, and d) release of the polymer layer and cytochrome c by breaking the host-guest interactions between surface-tethered azo dye and cyclodextrin via light irradiation (a and d). The molecular structure on the right represents the host-guest complexa-tion of the azo dye with the cyclodextrin-modified poly(acrylic acid). Reprinted, with permission, from [68]. Copyright (2009) Wiley Interscience...
Figure 9 Illustration of the combined SPR-based BIA/MS approach (139). Deriva-tized biosensor chips, having multiple (2-4) flow cells each, are used in the real-time SPR-BIA analysis of interactions between surface-bound receptors and solution-phase ligands. The sensor chips are removed from the biosensor after SPR-BIA, with ligands still retained within the flow cells, and prepared for MALDI-TOF by application of an appropriate matrix to the flow cells. The matrix solution disrupts the receptor-ligand interaction, liberating the ligand into solution for incorporation into the matrix crystals. With proper application of the matrix, the crystals settle onto the original location of the interaction and spatial resolution between flow cells is preserved. The flow cells are targeted individually during MALDI-TOF and the retained ligand(s) are detected at precise and characteristic m/z values. Figure 9 Illustration of the combined SPR-based BIA/MS approach (139). Deriva-tized biosensor chips, having multiple (2-4) flow cells each, are used in the real-time SPR-BIA analysis of interactions between surface-bound receptors and solution-phase ligands. The sensor chips are removed from the biosensor after SPR-BIA, with ligands still retained within the flow cells, and prepared for MALDI-TOF by application of an appropriate matrix to the flow cells. The matrix solution disrupts the receptor-ligand interaction, liberating the ligand into solution for incorporation into the matrix crystals. With proper application of the matrix, the crystals settle onto the original location of the interaction and spatial resolution between flow cells is preserved. The flow cells are targeted individually during MALDI-TOF and the retained ligand(s) are detected at precise and characteristic m/z values.
This quenching is attributed to energy transfer from the Zn porphyrin to PDS10, suggesting that the porphyrin adsorption is site-specific, i.e. the molecules tend to cluster on the surface, possibly as a consequence of n-stacking interactions between surface-bound porphyrin. [Pg.217]

To explain the observed width, it is necessary to look for strong surface-to-bulk interactions, i.e. large magnitudes of surface-exciton wave vectors. Such states, in our experimental conditions, may arise from virtual interactions with the surface polariton branch, which contains the whole branch of K vectors. We propose the following indirect mechanism for the surface-to-bulk transfer The surface exciton, K = 0, is scattered, with creation of a virtual surface phonon, to a surface polariton (K / 0). For K 0, the dipole sums for the interaction between surface and bulk layers may be very important (a few hundred reciprocal centimeters). Through this interaction the surface exciton penetrates deeply into the bulk, where the energy relaxes by the creation of bulk phonons. The probability of such a process is determined by the diagram... [Pg.152]

Even if one assumes that the water near a surface has the same structure as it does in bulk, the oscillations of the short-range interactions between surfaces could be explained by a nonlocal dielectric constant for water.24 This model assumes that the dielectric displacement field (D = epE 4- P) at a position r not only depends on the local electric field [D(r) = r(r)E(r), but also depends on the electric field in the whole space D(r) = jr(r,r )E(r )dr. In this model, the oscillations of the interactions are due to charge overscreening25 and are analogous to the charge density waves in plasmas.24... [Pg.487]

It is clear that the stability of the films depends on the interaction between surfaces in addition, the domains of stability of the black films are strongly dependent on their rigidity. The calculations presented in Figure 8b differ... [Pg.540]


See other pages where Interactions between surfaces is mentioned: [Pg.258]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.1516]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.507]    [Pg.554]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.162 ]




SEARCH



Chemical Interactions to the Adhesion Between Evaporated Metals and Functional Croups of Different Types at Polymer Surfaces

Electronic interaction, between support surface

Electrostatic Interaction Between Different Surfaces

Electrostatic interaction between two identical surfaces

Electrostatic interactions forces between charged surfaces

Electrostatic interactions stress between charged surfaces

Interacting Surface

Interaction between Ink and Printed Surface

Interaction between disclinations and surfaces

Interaction between surfaces across polyelectrolyte solutions

Interaction energy between flat surfaces

Interaction forces, between membrane surfaces

Interactions between Hydrophobized Solid Surfaces in Nonpolar Liquids

Interactions between Surfaces and Particles

Interactions between solid surfaces and

Interactions between surface atoms

Nickel oxide surface interactions between gases

Physical interaction, between support surface

Potential Energy of Interaction Between Particles and Surfaces

Refractive index, interactions between surfaces

Repulsion, interactions between surfaces

Surface Electrode Reaction Involving Interactions Between Immobilized Species

Surface-state mediated interactions between adatoms

The Derjaguin transform for interactions between oppositely curved surfaces

Thermodynamic interaction between polymer and surface

© 2024 chempedia.info