Adsorbate-surface interaction

The key parameters of the electronic structure of these surfaces are summarized in Table 9.3. The calculated rf-band vacancy of Pt shows no appreciable increase. Instead, there is a shght charge transfer from Co to Pt, which may be attributable to the difference in electronegativity of Pt and Co, in apparent contradiction with the substantial increase in Pt band vacancy previously reported [Mukerjee et al., 1995]. What does change systematically across these surfaces is the J-band center (s ) of Pt, which, as Fig. 9.12 demonstrates, systematically affects the reactivity of the surfaces. This correlation is consistent with the previous successes [Greeley et al., 2002 Mavrikakis et al., 1998] of the band model in describing the reactivity of various bimetallic surfaces and the effect of strain. Compressive strain lowers s, which, in turn, leads to weaker adsorbate-surface interaction, whereas expansive strain has the opposite effect. 

Most solutions used in electrodeposition of metals and alloys contain one or more inorganic or organic additives that have specific functions in the deposition process. These additives affect deposition and crystal-building processes as adsorbates at the surface of the cathode. Thus, in this chapter we first describe adsorption and the factors that determine adsorbate-surface interaction. There are two sets of factors that determine adsorption substrate and adsorbate factors. Substrate factors include electron density, d-band location, and the shape of substrate electronic orbitals. Adsorbate factors include electronegativity and the shape of adsorbate orbitals. 

Transition metals are used extensively as reforming catalysts and the variation in the catalytic activity can be determined by the differences in the strength of the adsorbate-surface interaction with various metals. One of the fundamental properties of a metal surface is in fact its ability to bond or to interact vflth surrounding atoms and molecules. The bonding ability determines the state of the metal surface when exposed to a gas or liquid and it determines the ability of the surface to act as a catalyst. During catalysis, the surface forms chemical bonds to the reactants and it helps in this way the breaking of intramolecular bonds and the formation of new bonds. 

It is evident from equation (4.44) that when sufficient adsorption has occurred to form a monolayer there is still always some fraction of surface unoccupied. Indeed, only for C values approaching infinity will 6q approach zero and in such cases the high adsorbate-surface interaction can only result from chemisorption. For nominal C values, say near 100, the fraction of surface unoccupied, when exactly sufficient adsorption has... 

Chemisorption and Physisorption. One classification of adsorption phenomena is based on the adsorption energy the energy of the adsorbate-surface interaction. In this classification there are two basic types of adsorption chemisorption (an abbreviation of chemical adsorption) and physisorption (an abbreviation of physical adsorption). In chemisorption the chemical attractive forces of adsorption are acting between surface and adsorbate (usually covalent bonds). Thus, there is a chemical combination between the substrate and the adsorbate where electrons are shared and/or transferred. New electronic configurations are formed by this sharing of electrons. In physisorption the physical forces of adsorption, van der Waals or pure electrostatic forces, operate between the surface and the adsorbate there is no electron transfer and no electron sharing. 

Our interest in SERS stemmed from our research activities concerned with establishing connections between the molecular structure of electrode interfaces and electrochemical reactivity. A current objective of our group is to employ SERS as a molecular probe of adsorbate-surface interactions to systems of relevance to electrochemical processes, and to examine the interfacial molecular changes brought about by electrochemical reactions. The combination of SERS and conventional electrochemical techniques can in principle yield a detailed picture of interfacial processes since the latter provides a sensitive monitor of the electron transfer and electronic redistributions associated with the surface molecular changes probed by the former. Although few such applications of SERS have been reported so far the approaches appear to have considerable promise. 

There are countless examples of the interactions of various atoms and molecules with the clean Si(100) surface. In addition these adsorbate-surface interactions can differ with deposition conditions, such as the rate of deposition or temperature of the sample. For example, even the simplest adsorbate, hydrogen, can etch the surface at room temperature and also form a variety of ordered structures at elevated sample temperatures [57]. A number of adsorbates can form ordered structures commensurate with the surface (e.g. Ag [58], Ga [59], Bi [60]), most transition metals react with the surface to form silicides (e.g. Ni [61], Co [62], Er [63]), halogens can etch the surface at room temperature (e.g. F2 [64], CI2 [65], Br2 [66]), some molecules dissociate on the surface (e.g. PH3 [67], B2H6 [68], NH3 [37]) and other molecules can bond to the silicon in different adsorption configurations but remain intact (e.g. Benzene [69], Cu-phthalocyanine [70], C60 [71]). A detailed review of a number of adsorbate-Si(lOO) interactions can be found in [23,72] and a more specific review relating to organic adsorbates can be found in [22]. As an example of an adsorbate-silicon system we shall here consider the adsorption of a molecule that our group has extensive experience with phosphine. 

A catalyst surface may be assumed to be characterized by specific poisoning if the number of adsorption sites, the strength (or the strength distribution) of the adsorbate-catalyst interaction, and the nature of this interaction as well as the chemical nature of the adsorbed species can be determined. All three properties are equally important to characterize fully, i. e., qualitatively and quantitatively, a catalyst surface. The number of adsorption sites may be determined from the adsorbed amount of poison as measured by conventional techniques, whereas thermoanalytical methods have to be applied for a quantitative characterization of the adsorption bond strength. Spectroscopic methods will be most suitable for studies of the chemical nature of the adsorbed species and the nature of the adsorbate-surface interaction. 

All the examples used in this chapter have involved either surface properties alone or strong adsorbate/surface interactions. The weak adsorption of molecules to surfaces depends on van der Waals interactions. At the electronic structure level these require long-range correlation effects to be accounted for and so neither HF,... 

First, there are many variables that determine SERS enhancement, not all of which are controlled. Even if particle size and shape can be reproduced, surface chemistry is difficult to control and is generally unstable. Chance exposure to contaminants or reconstruction of the metal surface can significantly vary the observed enhancement over time. Second, chemical enhancement depends on the adsorbate-surface interaction and varies both with surface chemistry and with adsorbate structure. Analytes differ greatly in the strength of this interaction, and surface contamination can prevent it altogether. SERS is not a general phenomenon as far as the wide range of species encountered in chemical analysis. Third, relative intensities and even peak frequencies can be quite different for an adsorbed molecule compared to the spectrum observed in bulk. 

The adsorption of either ions or neutral molecules on the electrode surface depends on qn, i.e., on the apphed electric potential. Correspondingly, the electric field at the electrochemical interface is an additional free-energy contribution that either favors or restricts the adsorption of species on the electrode from the ionic conducting phase. A variety of adsorption isotherms has been proposed to account for the behavior of different electrochemical systems. Among them are the Langmuir, Frumkin, and Temkin isotherms [2]. Frumkin and Temkin isotherms, at variance with the Langmuir one, include effects such as adsorbate—adsorbate or adsorbate—surface interactions. 

Method (ii). Redhead [63] derived equations for desorption rate maxima for various orders of reaction, but the expressions are rather insensitive to order so, again, evaluation of the pre-exponential term does not necessarily provide physically useful information. Because Tp can be obtained accurately, however, the energy term can also be precisely estimated and where the adsorbate—surface interaction dominates the adsorbate—adsorbate interaction, it provides a reliable value for the... 

---