Chemisorption surface interactions

Whitten J L and Pakkanen T A 1980 Chemisorption theory for metallic surfaces Electron localization and the description of surface interactions Phys. Rev. B 21 4357-67... 

An example of a structural effect is on the gold (111) surface where there is an in-plane tangential surface pressure (, , 35) On extended surfaces, a hill-and-valley roughening occurs to accommodate the expansion, as described earlier. In contrast, small particles accommodate the pressure by a surface buckle ( ). We would expect similar behaviour when there is chemisorption involving interactions between the adsorbed molecules. 

It is evident from equation (4.44) that when sufficient adsorption has occurred to form a monolayer there is still always some fraction of surface unoccupied. Indeed, only for C values approaching infinity will 6q approach zero and in such cases the high adsorbate-surface interaction can only result from chemisorption. For nominal C values, say near 100, the fraction of surface unoccupied, when exactly sufficient adsorption has... 

Fig. 4.39 (a) A generally accepted view of chemisorption. The originally sharp atomic energy level is broadened and shifted by adatom-surface interactions. (6) In an applied positive electric field F, the localized adatom band is shifted upward... 

In recent years considerable experimental justification has been obtained for the view that in many cases surface interactions during chemisorption can give... 

It is through the changes in the electronic structure of the chemisorbed species or the surface that MGssbauer spectroscopy can be used in the study of surface interactions between gases and surface sites. Because a Mossbauer spectrum represents a sum of the contributions from the various interactions present, in contrast to an average value, information may also be deduced about the nonuniformity of the surface for the studied chemisorption or catalytic process. In such studies, the Mossbauer isotope may be part of the catalytic surface and/or present in the chemisorbed species, as illustrated in the following examples. 

That surface interactions play such a role clearly demands that some sort of surface state concept be invoked. However, no simple techniques have yielded direct information about the nature of such states. To explain charge transfer, isoenergetic electron or hole processes are normally invoked with a subsequent thermalization of the electron or hole in the semiconductor. This unfortunately necessitates the existence of a surface state at the level of the redox potential. This may of necessity occur when strong chemisorption is present. However, in those cases,... 

Chemisorption and Physisorption. One classification of adsorption phenomena is based on the adsorption energy the energy of the adsorbate-surface interaction. In this classification there are two basic types of adsorption chemisorption (an abbreviation of chemical adsorption) and physisorption (an abbreviation of physical adsorption). In chemisorption the chemical attractive forces of adsorption are acting between surface and adsorbate (usually covalent bonds). Thus, there is a chemical combination between the substrate and the adsorbate where electrons are shared and/or transferred. New electronic configurations are formed by this sharing of electrons. In physisorption the physical forces of adsorption, van der Waals or pure electrostatic forces, operate between the surface and the adsorbate there is no electron transfer and no electron sharing. 

Figure 3 Schematic diagrams of prototypes of gas-surface interactions as can be probed by molecular beams, presented as side views of the surface atoms or cubes. (A) molecular scattering in which parallel momentum is conserved and die surface is represented by hard cubes. (B) molecular scattering from individual surface atoms. (C) molecular scattering in the presence of a strong chemisorption well. (D) molecular scattering for a partially passivated surface, containing specific sites where chemisorption is possible. Note that in this case the interaction is also strongly orientation dependent. From Ref. [1].

In the present paper we have once more shown the active role of defects in the dynamics of gas-surface interactions. In particular we have analysed the case of 02 and C2H4 adsorbed on Ag surfaces, either flat or with a high density of open steps, finding that some processes are enabled by the presence of defects. For both gases open steps were indeed proved to remove the adsorption barriers for chemisorption. For 0/Ag(21 0), moreover, a pathway leading to population of subsurface sites was also found. 

Here (pi are the Kohn-Sham orbitals and a is a properly chosen localized function, in the present case most suitably the Ru 4d and the O 2p atomic orbitals within a sphere around given atomic sites. According to the Anderson-Grimley-Newns model of chemisorption, the interaction of the O 2p level with the narrow 4d band of the TM surface gives rise to bonding states at the lower edge of the d band and antibonding states at the upper... 

The results of these experiments form a picture of the dominant features of the methane-nickel surface interaction potential that control the mechanism of the dissociation of methane. We will find that there is indeed a barrier to the dissociative chemisorption of methane and that translational and vibrational energy of the incident methane molecule are effective in overcoming 1t. The identification of this barrier along the dissociative reaction coordinate allows the establishment of a link between low pressure, ultrahigh vacuum surface science and high pressure catalysis (ref. 3). 

Figure 2. A one-dimensional representation of a molecule-surface interaction. The depth of the physisorption and chemisorption wells are fPp and respectively. The barrier to chemisorption is and the barrier to desorption is j. The probability of physisorption is a, while the rate constants for desorption and chemisorption out of the physisorbed state are fej and k, respectively.

The second most important step in catalytic processes is the diffusion step. The majority of catalysts are of porous structure where most of the catalytic surface is in the intrapores. The reacting molecules must come in intimate contact with the catalytic surface where the interaction between the reacting molecules and the catalytic surface can take place (whether it is chemisorption, surface oxidation or surface reduction). 

Detailed analysis of the rate parameters in Table 1 reveals the role of individual metallic impurity in each of the steps of the surface interaction. For example, it can be concluded that the chemisorption of H2 gas is nearly independent of the metallic catalyst because the rates aR5 oR of the chemisorption are practically the same on the surfaces of all the sensors in our experiments. On the contrary, the desorption rate ySdR and the rate of the bimolecular interaction v ox are evidently higher for the surfaces modified by the metals than for pure Sn02 sensor. Such detailed comparison of the rates is important for the fundamental description of the sensor. 

Theoty, for the most part, has been used to provide a conceptual understanding of adsorption and reactivity. Much of the previous literature has focused on complementing surface science and organometallic chemistry in the analysis of adsorbates on model clusters and surfaces. The results from these studies have helped to establish the fundamental electronic factors that control surface chemisorption and reactivity. While theory has helped provide a wealth of information on the basic adsorbate-adsorbate and adsorbate-surface interactions, little however, has been achieved in terms of quantitative analyses. For a more indepth analysis of the quantum chemical... 

---