Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Plasma-surface interactions nature

C. Parameter Control At present, the most serious impediment to routine use of plasma etching is the large number of parameters that affect the process. As noted, both gas phase considerations and plasma-surface interactions must be controlled. The problem is illustrated in Figure 7 32). Naturally, if the basic plasma parameters (A, /(e), r) could be con-... [Pg.228]

Erosion during mixed impurity species bombardment of beryllium has also shown unexpected chemical effects that play a dominant role in determining the erosion rate of the substrate material. Bombardment of a beryllium sample with a CO+ ion beam produces an equilibrium surface state consisting of beryllium oxide, elemental carbon and C-0 compounds [13]. The chemical erosion of CO limits the carbon accumulation on the surface and therefore beryllium continues to be eroded. The complicated and interrelated nature of plasma-surface interactions requires measurements to be made in a situation that includes as many of the conditions of the final application as possible. [Pg.342]

The plasma-wall interaction of the neutral particles is described by a so-called sticking model [136, 137]. In this model only the radicals react with the surface, while nonradical neutrals (H2, SiHa, and Si H2 +2) are reflected into the discharge. The surface reaction and sticking probability of each radical must be specified. The nature (material, roughness) and the temperature of the surface will influence the surface reaction probabilities. Perrin et al. [136] and Matsuda et al. [137] have shown that the surface reaction coefficient of SiH3 is temperature-independent at a value of = 0.26 0.05 at a growing a-Si H surface in a... [Pg.39]

The previous discussion has shown that plasma impurities present a complex set of problems whose solution is crucial to the successful operation of fusion reactors. The many and often subtle factors that govern plasma-materials interactions are still only partially understood. Consequently, the methods used today to control impurities are to a degree empirical in nature and cannot yet be precisely defined. It is likely that in the end a variety of approaches will be used to keep plasma impurities at minimal levels. The techniques are conveniently divided into divertor and non-divertor methods. The latter depend on modifications of one sort or another of the composition or structure of the surfaces facing the plasma. As will be seen in Sect. 6.5., meth-... [Pg.84]

In astrophysical studies, one can study plasmas unaffected by solid surfaces. By way of contrast, laboratory plasmas always interact with such surfaces. Accordingly, if we are to properly understand the behavior of laboratory plasmas, we must inquire into the nature of the plasma-solid surface interaction. [Pg.48]

As we expand our observations from the behavior of a few proteins to that of plasma, we may begin to feel justified in asking why the system performs rather than how it does. The question "Why do plasma proteins interact at interfaces " can then be interpreted to mean "what aspects of the behavior and interactions among purified plasma proteins can be seen as well in their natural habitat - the plasma -, and can these aspects be explained as being beneficial to our survival " What thus far had appeared as senselessly complex behavior of purified proteins at interfaces may become more reasonable in the context of many plasma proteins interacting at the mottled surfaces of cells in a way that will allow the survival of their host. Meanwhile, we will discover that purified proteins behave unlike their sibblings in vivo and that in the eyes of our plasma a purified protein adsorbed out of an artificial solution will not look like a film of the same protein deposited by the plasma itself. [Pg.159]

The adsorption of a layer of plasma proteins is the first event which occurs when blood is exposed to an artificial surface ( ). As a result, a platelet never sees or adheres to a bare surface. The nature of the adsorbed protein layer, which depends on the relative concentrations and mobilities of the proteins in plasma and on their affinity for the surface, will condition the subsequent platelet-surface interaction ( ). Protein adsorption to foreign surfaces has... [Pg.537]

Interactions of blood, or more precisely of plasma macromolecules and blood cells with the vessel wall, should the latter be natural or artificial, depend upon several parameters the mechanical properties of the vascular conduit, on the one hand, the morphology and the physical and chemical characteristics of the blood-contacting surface on the other. [Pg.381]

Another attempt by Tricas et al. to modify the surface of carbon black was by the plasma polymerization of acrylic acid [34]. Treatment with acrylic acid made carbon black hydrophilic. Plasma-coated carbon black was mixed with natural rubber and showed increased filler-filler interaction. The bound rubber content was reduced after the surface treatment of the filler. The authors also concluded that the surface of the carbon black was completely covered by the plasma polymer film, preventing the carbon black surface from playing any role in the polymer matrix. [Pg.180]

In addition to thermal desorption, gas desorption has been found to result from electron, ion and photon bombardment of surfaces. Therefore, simultaneous particle and photon bombardments can be expected to alter desorption rates, as well as the nature and charge distribution of the desorbed species. Furthermore, simultaneous bombardment of a surface by neutrons and ions could affect diffusion processes, e.g., by radiation-induced segregation. In turn, desorption processes can be influenced by altering the diffusion of species from the bulk to the surface. The type, energy, and angular distribution of particles expected to strike neutral beam injector dump areas (such areas can represent 1/9 of total first wall area) can cause synergistic effects on gas desorption which can be quite different from those expected from the interaction of plasma radiations with the first wall. [Pg.83]


See other pages where Plasma-surface interactions nature is mentioned: [Pg.2806]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.894]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.2810]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.874]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.247]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.153 , Pg.154 ]




SEARCH



Interacting Surface

Plasma nature

Plasma surface interaction

Surface nature

Surfaces plasma-surface interactions

© 2024 chempedia.info