Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface interaction, effect

The application of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) for monitoring redox and other processes at metal-solution interfaces is illustrated by means of some recent results obtained in our laboratory. The detection of adsorbed species present at outer- as well as inner-sphere reaction sites is noted. The influence of surface interaction effects on the SER spectra of adsorbed redox couples is discussed with a view towards utilizing the frequency-potential dependence of oxidation-state sensitive vibrational modes as a criterion of reactant-surface electronic coupling effects. Illustrative data are presented for Ru(NH3)63+/2+ adsorbed electrostatically to chloride-coated silver, and Fe(CN)63 /" bound to gold electrodes the latter couple appears to be valence delocalized under some conditions. The use of coupled SERS-rotating disk voltammetry measurements to examine the kinetics and mechanisms of irreversible and multistep electrochemical reactions is also discussed. Examples given are the outer- and inner-sphere one-electron reductions of Co(III) and Cr(III) complexes at silver, and the oxidation of carbon monoxide and iodide at gold electrodes. [Pg.135]

Surface Interaction Effects Upon Adsorbed Redox Couples Valence-Trapped Versus Valence-Delocalized Cases... [Pg.137]

The capillary effect is apparent whenever two non-miscible fluids are in contact, and is a result of the interaction of attractive forces between molecules in the two liquids (surface tension effects), and between the fluids and the solid surface (wettability effects). [Pg.120]

These equations imply that A132 will exceed A12 if A33 is larger than A13 + A23. This effect, termed lyophobic bonding, occurs if the solvent-surface interaction is weaker than that between the solvent molecules. More interestingly, the dispersion interaction will be repulsive (A 132 < 0) when An and/or A23 are sufficiently large. Israelachvili [1] tabulates a number of Am values Awhw Ahwh 0-4X 10 erg, Apwp 1 x 10" erg, and Aqwq = O.SX -IO erg, where W, H, P, and Q denote water, hydrocarbon, polystyrene and quartz respectively. [Pg.240]

Of course the real projectile-surface interaction potential is not infinitely hard (cf figure A3,9,2. As E increases, the projectile can penetrate deeper into the surface, so that at its turning point (where it momentarily stops before reversing direction to return to the gas phase), an energetic projectile interacts with fewer surface atoms, thus making the effective cube mass smaller. Thus, we expect bE/E to increase with E (and also with W since the well accelerates the projectile towards the surface). [Pg.902]

Sasaki N and Tsukada M 1999 Theory for the effect of the tip-surface interaction potentiai on atomic resoiution in forced vibration system of noncontact AFM Appl. Surf. Sc/. 140 339... [Pg.1725]

Regions of Homogeneity of Non-stoichiometric Oxides in the Surface interaction Layers and the Effect of Oxygen Pressure on their Range of Stabiiity... [Pg.1134]

Concentration Diagrams and the Effect of Physicai and Chemicai Factors on the Composition and Stabiiity of Surface interaction Layers (Fe, -Zn, . [Pg.1136]

In the many reports on photoelectron spectroscopy, studies on the interface formation between PPVs and metals, focus mainly on the two most commonly used top electrode metals in polymer light emitting device structures, namely aluminum [55-62] and calcium [62-67]. Other metals studied include chromium [55, 68], gold [69], nickel [69], sodium [70, 71], and rubidium [72], For the cases of nickel, gold, and chromium deposited on top of the polymer surfaces, interactions with the polymers are reported [55, 68]. In the case of the interface between PPV on top of metallic chromium, however, no interaction with the polymer was detected [55]. The results concerning the interaction between chromium and PPV indicates two different effects, namely the polymer-on-metal versus the metal-on-polymer interface formation. Next, the PPV interface formation with aluminum and calcium will be discussed in more detail. [Pg.78]

In the following paper, the possibility of equilibration of the primarily adsorbed portions of polymer was analyzed [20]. The surface coupling constant (k0) was introduced to characterize the polymer-surface interaction. The constant k0 includes an electrostatic interaction term, thus being k0 > 1 for polyelectrolytes and k0 1 for neutral polymers. It was found that, theoretically, the adsorption characteristics do not depend on the equilibration processes for k0 > 1. In contrast, for neutral polymers (k0 < 1), the difference between the equilibrium and non-equilibrium modes could be considerable. As more polymer is adsorbed, excluded-volume effects will swell out the loops of the adsorbate, so that the mutual reorientation of the polymer chains occurs. [Pg.139]

The interaction effect between a dispersion medium and a filler on the net-formation in a filled polymer melt is mostly visuallized in the fact that the finishing treatment of the surface of solid particles results in a significant change of the position of the flow curve of the filled polymer on the whole, and yield stress as well [5, 8-10]. [Pg.80]

For solid surfaces interacting in air, the adhesion forces mainly result from van der Waals interaction and capillary force, but the effects of electrostatic forces due to the formation of an electrical double-layer have to be included for analyzing adhesion in solutions. Besides, adhesion has to be studied as a dynamic process in which the approach and separation of two surfaces are always accompanied by unstable motions, jump in and out, attributing to the instability of sliding system. [Pg.184]

To measure an individual particle surface interaction and its material removal effects. Because of the complexity of the polishing system, it is highly desirable to characterize the physical and chemical behavior of individual interactions while other components are fixed. AFM technology can be provided to explore slurry particle interactions with different surfaces in different liquid ambient. [Pg.261]

Although the DMT theory attempts to incorporate distance-dependent surface interactions into the adhesion problem, it does not take into account the effect surface forces have on the elastic deformation. In other words, it does not predict the neck formation predicted by JKR. [Pg.20]

The popular and well-studied primitive model is a degenerate case of the SPM with = 0, shown schematically in Figure (c). The restricted primitive model (RPM) refers to the case when the ions are of equal diameter. This model can realistically represent the packing of a molten salt in which no solvent is present. For an aqueous electrolyte, the primitive model does not treat the solvent molecules exphcitly and the number density of the electrolyte is umealistically low. For modeling nano-surface interactions, short-range interactions are important and the primitive model is expected not to give adequate account of confinement effects. For its simphcity, however, many theories [18-22] and simulation studies [23-25] have been made based on the primitive model for the bulk electrolyte. Ap-phcations to electrolyte interfaces have also been widely reported [26-30]. [Pg.629]

A Box-Behnken design was employed to investigate statistically the main and interactive effects of four process variables (reaction time, enzyme to substrate ratio, surfactant addition, and substrate pretreatment) on enzymatic conversion of waste office paper to sugars. A response surface model relating sugar yield to the four variables was developed on the basis of the experimental results. The model could be successfully used to identify the most efficient combination of the four variables for maximizing the extent of sugar production. [Pg.121]

The key parameters of the electronic structure of these surfaces are summarized in Table 9.3. The calculated rf-band vacancy of Pt shows no appreciable increase. Instead, there is a shght charge transfer from Co to Pt, which may be attributable to the difference in electronegativity of Pt and Co, in apparent contradiction with the substantial increase in Pt band vacancy previously reported [Mukerjee et al., 1995]. What does change systematically across these surfaces is the J-band center (s ) of Pt, which, as Fig. 9.12 demonstrates, systematically affects the reactivity of the surfaces. This correlation is consistent with the previous successes [Greeley et al., 2002 Mavrikakis et al., 1998] of the band model in describing the reactivity of various bimetallic surfaces and the effect of strain. Compressive strain lowers s, which, in turn, leads to weaker adsorbate-surface interaction, whereas expansive strain has the opposite effect. [Pg.287]

In above sections the main attention has been paid to adsorption-caused change in electrophysical characteristics of semiconductor adsorbent caused by surface charging effects. However, as it was mentioned in section 1.6, the change in electrophysical characteristics of such adsorbents can be caused by other mechanisms, e.g. by direct interaction of absorbate with the surface defects provided (as in the case of oxide adsorbents) by superstoichiometric atoms of metals and oxygen... [Pg.81]

The effects of calcium on polymer-solvent and polymer-surface interactions are dependent on polymer ionicity a maximum intrinsic viscosity and a minimum adsorption density as a function of polymer ionicity are obtained. For xanthan, on the other hand, no influence of specific polymer-calcium interaction is detected either on solution or on adsorption properties, and the increase in adsorption due to calcium addition is mainly due to reduction in electrostatic repulsion. The maximum adsorption density of xanthan is also found to be independent of the nature of the adsorbent surface, and the value is close to that calculated for a closely-packed monolayer of aligned molecules. [Pg.227]


See other pages where Surface interaction, effect is mentioned: [Pg.113]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.724]    [Pg.2806]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.695]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.537]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.707]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.196]   


SEARCH



Effective interaction

Effects interaction

Effects of Surface Roughness on Interactions with Particles

Interacting Surface

Interactive effects

Loading, surface oxide-support interaction effect

Nonlinear, Band-structure, and Surface Effects in the Interaction of Charged Particles with Solids

Surface interaction, effect adsorbates

Surface interaction, effect complexes

© 2024 chempedia.info