Adsorption surface interaction energetics

At low adsorbate loadings, the differential heat of adsorption decreases with increasing adsorbate loadings. This is direct evidence that the adsorbent surface is energetically heterogeneous, ie, some adsorption sites interact more strongly with the adsorbate molecules. These sites are filled first so that adsorption of additional molecules involves progressively lower heats of adsorption. 

A number of the assumptions used in the BET theory have been questioned for real samples [6]. One assumption states that all adsorption sites are energetically equivalent, which is not the case for normal samples. The BET model ignores lateral adsorbate interactions on the surface, and it also assumes that the heat of adsorption for the second layer and above is equal to the heat of liquefaction. This assumption is not valid at high pressures and is the reason for using adsorbate pressures less than 0.35. In spite of these concerns, the BET method has proven to be an accurate representation of surface area for the majority of samples [9,10]. 

Initial reconstruction caused by flame armealing is stopped when the surface is cooled in the atmosphere, though not in water. The rate of transition from unreconstructed to reconstructed surface is determined by the height of the activation barrier [348], especially at the room temperature. Reconstruction may be removed by adsorption of atoms and molecules [349], since unreconstructed, and thus, more open surface, interacts with the adsorbates stronger than does the densely packed surface. Therefore, the removal of reconstructed surface proceeds from the less to the more energetically favored state [348]. Reconstruction coupled with the formation of more dense surface structure may lead to quite a strong increase in the number of surface atoms. For instance, the Au(100)-(1 X 1) Au(100)-(hex) reconstruction is accompanied by the increase in the number of surface atoms by 24%. 

In spite of the success of the BET theory, some of the assumptions upon which it is founded are not above criticism. One questionable assumption is that of an energetically homogeneous surface, that is, all the adsorption sites are energetically identical. Further, the BET model ignores the influence of lateral adsorbate interactions. 

In order to get a more realistic description of surface reactions energetic interactions must be taken into account. We introduced in Section 9.2.1 a general model which is able to handle systems which include mono- and bimolecular steps like adsorption, desorption, diffusion and reaction [38]. Here we apply this model to an extended version of the ZGB-model which incorporates particle diffusion and desorption [41]. 

Rudzinski W., Borowiecki T., Panczyk T., and Dominko A., Theory Of Thermodesorption From Energetically Heterogeneous Surfaces The Combined Effects Of Surface Heterogeneity, Re-Adsorption, And Interactions Between The Adsorbed Molecules, Langmuir, 16 (2000) pp.8037-8049. 

A mean-field estimate of the free energy of adsorption and the thickness of the adsorbed chain can be made by assuming the monomers are uniformly distributed at different distances from the surface up to thickness, ads-Then the fraction of monomers in direct contact with the surface (within distance b from the surface) is / ads- The number of adsorbed monomers Nbj sids is multiplied by the adsorption energy per monomer-surface contact (—6kT) to calculate the energetic gain from the surface interaction ... 

The results presented above show that the adsorption characteristics on energetically homogeneous adsorbing surfaces are determined by three main factors. The short-range interactions expressed by the parameter the dipole-dipole interactions, the contribution of which in the simple case of single adsorption is determined by the parameters p = a/ s and B/( a), and the co-adsorption of other adsorbates. On solid surfaces an additional factor should be taken into account. It is the heterogeneity of the adsorbing surface. 

The Impact of Water Adsorption on the Energetics of Surface Interactions of Powders of Different Crystal Forms... 

Some criticism can be made of the assumptions of the B.E.T. adsorption model. If the second and other layers are assumed to be in the liquid state, how can localized adsorption take place on these layers Also, the assumption that the stacks of molecules do not interact energetically seems to be unrealistic. In spite of these theoretical weaknesses, the B.E.T. adsorption expression is very useful for qualitative application to type II and III isotherms, the B.E.T equation is very widely used in the estimation of specific surface areas of solids. The surface area of the adsorbent is estimated from the value of Vm. The most commonly used adsorbate in this method for area determination is nitrogen at 77 K. The knee in the type II isotherm is assumed to correspond to the completion of a monolayer. In the most strict sense, the cross-sectional area of an adsorption site, rather than that of the adsorbate molecule, ought to be used, but the former is an unknown quantity however, this fact does not prevent the B.E.T. expression from being useful for the evaluation of surface areas of adsorbents. 

The theoretical treatments of other electrocatalytic reactions are very limited. Even semiquantitative treatments are important since they provide insight as to the role of adsorption sites and surface interactions involving reactants, intermediates, and/or products. Of special interest are theoretical treatments of the energetics of adsorption on various sites using molecular orbital and X- scattered wave calculations in combination with experimentally evaluated adsorption isotherms and in situ spectroscopic measurements on single-crystal electrode surfaces. 

In monolayer adsorption, all the adsorbed molecules are in contact with the surface layer of the adsorbent [46]. The adsorbate molecules are thus adsorbed on a fixed number of localized sites, each of which can only hold one adsorbate molecule (the molecules of the adsorbate are not deposited on others already adsorbed, only on the free surface of the adsorbent). The most suitable models describing the monolayer theory are the Langmuir-type ones. They presume that all adsorption sites are energetically equivalent and that there is no interaction between the adsorbed molecules [47]. 

High pressure argon adsorption isotherms were measured up to 10 MPa on mesoporous molecular sieves with various pore sizes at 303 K. The adsorption properties of argon onto mesopores were energetically analyzed by Langmuir theory. The calculated adsorption energy decreased monotonically with increase of pore diameter even in mesopore range, caused by an enhancement of molecule-surface interaction due to the curvature of pore wall. 

Figure 9.7 shows that loopy adsorption dramatically reduces p in the outer regions (x/L > 0-5) of the steric layer compared with that for tails, for example. Physically, this can be readily understood the energetically favoured surface interactions result in segments being displaced from the peripheral regions of the steric layer and relocated in closer proximity to the surface. 

Although the BET theory is used extensively, it still suffers from a number of criticisms. The first is that surfaces of real solids are heterogeneous while the model assumes that all the adsorption sites are energetically identical. The second reason is the assumption of the vertical force between adsorbent and adsorbate molecules. It neglects the horizontal interaction between adsorbed molecules. The third reason was put forward by Halsey (1948) and is detailed below. 

---