Interaction of protons with surface

The interpretation of this observation is not simple and calls for evaluation of two more parameters the interaction of protons with surface groups... 

Since UTCLs contain no added electrolyte, the mode of proton transport in such layers remains a debated question. It was postulated in Chan and Eikerling (2011) that protons in water-filled UTCL pores undergo bulk-water-like transport, similar to ion transport in charged nanofluidic channels (Daiguji, 2010 Stein et al., 2004) and gold nanoporous membranes (Nishizawa et al., 1995). The proton conductivity of the pore is then determined by the electrostatic interaction of protons with the surface charge of pore walls. 

The free energy of interaction of protons (and other ions) with a charged surface is the sum of the chemical energy of adsorption and an electrostatic component, i. e. 

Martin et al. (1996) studied the surface structures formed when 4-chloro-catechol adsorbs onto Ti02. These surface interactions were studied to gain a better understanding of how these surface structures affect photoreactivity. Adsorption isotherms of 4-chlorocatechol demonstrate that the compound adsorbs to a greater extent at pH values 7 to 9. The interactions of protons and 4-chlorocatechol with the Ti02 surface are explained by the double layer theory (Martin et al., 1996). 

Since in aqueous solutions there is actually competition for the ligands between the metal ions [M] and protons [H], Eq. (3) applies only to the interaction of completely deprotonated surface sites with metal ions. In practice partially deprotonated ligands are usually involved. 

The effect of "residual water" on either protein stability or enzyme activity continues to be a topic of great interest. For example, several properties of lysozyme (e.g., heat capacity, diamagnetic susceptibility (Hageman, 1988), and dielectric behavior (Bone and Pethig, 1985 Bone, 1996)) show an inflection point at the hydration limit. Detailed studies on the direct current protonic conductivity of lysozyme powders at various levels of hydration have suggested that the onset of hydration-induced protonic conduction (and quite possibly for the onset of enzymatic activity) occurs at the hydration limit. It was hypothesized that this threshold corresponds to the formation of a percolation network of absorbed water molecules on the surface of the protein (Careri et al., 1988). More recently. Smith et al., (2002) have shown that, beyond the hydration limit, the heat of interaction of water with the amorphous solid approaches the heat of condensation of water, as we have shown to be the case for amorphous sugars. 

It was initially (30) believed that the abnormal CH radical (Me ) which decayed at 77 K (half-life of about 12 h) formed another radical X. In a second paper (46) the authors assigned X to the Interaction of CH with boron on the surface. This Interpretation was soon corrected by Garbutt and Gesser (40) who showed the Me does not decay into X and is only formed when the PVG had been outgassed at 973 to 1123 K under high vacuum, and with less than a monolayer of CH I (preferably 9 0.01). The values of the proton hfs was corrected to 19.3 0.05 G. The radical X was primarily formed on PVG which had been outgassed at about 723 K. Three satellite lines were Identified for each of the four proton lines. Based on the pretreatment of the PVG with H2O (which lead to CH with large satellite line intensities) and D O (which yielded CH with almost no satellite lines) it was concluded that X is due to... 

The interaction of protein with water is also an important consideration because the electrical conductivity of the adsorbed protein layer depends on the mechanism of charge transfer. The conduction in proteins with low water content is electronic, whereas at higher water contents it is protonic and/or due to small inorganic ions (35, 36). Water is considered (37) to exist in two structural forms clusters (ordered) formed by hydrogen bonds, and free unbounded water (monomeric). Any factors, such as temperature, that favor monomeric water tend to increase the protein s catalytic activity, and factors favoring cluster formation tend to decrease catalytic activity. In addition, increased catalytic activity is probably related to increased binding properties to foreign surfaces. 

The interaction of olefins with silver ions on the adsorbent surface can be classified as a rapidly reversible, weak chemisorption. Proton-substituted acetylene derivatives (R—C=C—H) adsorb on silver-impregnated adsorbents with strong, slowly reversible chemisorption (as the silver acetylide). This permits the clean-cut separation of such acetylene compounds (as a group) from other sample components (90). 

---