Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular interactions at the surface

We may recall that the attractive V (r) is negative, so that work must be done to create a new surface, so there is an increase in free energy when a molecule is taken from the bulk and placed in the surface, as we have already discussed in Section 3.2.4. Unfortunately the experimental determination of aa is extremely difficult and we have to rely on density distribution functions and statistical mechanics or some other assumptions. It is well known that the effects of molecular structure and shape are often large for any condensed system, but since we have no adequate tools for describing such effects in a truly fundamental way, the best we can do is to estimate these effects by molecular simulation using computers. As we have already mentioned in Section 3.4.3, the density of the neighbor molecules is not uniform locally it is rather a function of the distance r from the guest molecule, p = ffr). This function is known as the density distribution function which can be approximately modeled and used in computation (see Section 4.1). [Pg.113]

Pitzer, K.S. and Brewer L. (1961) Thermodynamics (2nd edn). McGraw-Hill, New York. [Pg.113]

Atkins, P.W. (1998) Physical Chemistry (6th edn). Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Pg.113]

(1968) The Physics and Chemistry of Surfaces. Dover, New York. [Pg.114]


A constant and homogeneous concentration of free analyte represents the ideal condition for modeling molecular interactions at the surface of an SPR biosensor. In the most frequent case where an analyte binds to an immobilized receptor with 1 1 stoichiometry, the interaction follows the pseudo first-order kinetic model. Adequate interaction models can be built up to describe more complex molecular interactions some of them have been presented and explained above. [Pg.90]

In (8), Eq = V(JD is the applied electric field across the slit before reduction due to water polarization E E = 0 EJe )). Equations (6) and (7) suggest an expression for apparent contact angle cos0g cosOf + EoDEoIAj. Here, Wei is associated with volume rather than with the surface layer alone. Equation (6) also presumes that bare surface tensions, jab ia, b = s,, v) remain unaffected by the field. While the latter is usually true for the solid-vapor term, the alignment of water molecules in the field can modify molecular interactions at the surface and hence further affect ysi and yi, an effect confirmed by simulations (see Sect. 4.2). [Pg.160]

There are of course difficulties associated with transmission electron microscopy. Notable amongst these are problems relating to specimen preparation. Ultramicrotomy carries with it the risk of mechanical damage, whereas casting on to substrates can lead to the modification of the structure by specific molecular interactions at the surfaces. [Pg.166]

The measured value of y of CCI4 is 27 mN/m (Table 1.2). The large difference can be ascribed to the assumption that a Stefan ratio of 2 was used in this example. As expected, the simple ratio with factor 2 may vary for nonspherical molecules (as in the case of CCI4). Under these assumptions, one may conclude that the estimated value of y is an acceptable description of the surface molecules. This example is useful for basic considerations about the molecular interactions at the surfaces. [Pg.38]

Spectral changes of surface tmns-Az moieties can be useful indices of molecular interaction at the surface. Their absorption peaks locating around ca. SSOnm and ca. 240nm ate ir — ir transitions, whose transition dipoles are parallel and perpendicular to the Az long axis, respectively (18). The absorption spectrum of Az on the quartz plate is quite similar to that in solution suggesting no specific alignment of Az on the substrate in average. [Pg.456]

Finally, engineered surfaces may contribute to the understanding of adhesion (172). Control of adhesion is essential to a large number of industrial processes and is often associated with various problems, but currendy (ca 1997) there is Htde if any understanding of how specific molecular ordering and interactions at the surface may affect adhesion. [Pg.546]

Mechanistic smdies are needed on a select nnmber of electrochemical reactions, particularly those involving oxygen. These smdies are far from routine and reqnire advances in knowledge of molecular interactions at electrode surfaces in the presence of an electrolyte. Recent achievements in surface science under ultrahigh vacuum conditions snggest that a comparable effort in electrochemical systems would be equally fmitful. [Pg.173]

Molecular orientation at the surface may also be important. A molecule orients planarly when deposited on a solid surface. Molecular strands prefer to be parallel to the surface their probability of being oriented normal to the surface is very low. Several mechanisms can cause this orientation (1) Surface-active sites may favor entire chain segments to interact with the surface. (2) The... [Pg.227]

The use of CO as a chemical probe of the nature of the molecular interactions with the surface sites of metallic catalysts [6] was the first clear experimental example of the transposition to surface science and in particular to chemisorption of the concepts of coordination chemistry [1, 2, 5], In fact the Chatt-Duncanson model [7] of coordination of CO, olefins, etc. to transition metals appeared to be valid also for the interactions of such probes on metal surfaces. It could not fit with the physical approach to the surface states based on solid state band gap theory [8], which was popular at the end of 1950, but at least it was a simple model for the evidence of a localized process of chemical adsorption of molecules such as olefins, CO, H, olefins, dienes, aromatics, and so on to single metal atoms on the surfaces of metals or metal oxides [5]. [Pg.4]

In the Langmuir derivation the adsorbed molecules are allowed to interact with the adsorbent but not with each other The adsorbed layer is assumed to be ideal. This necessarily limits adsorption to a monolayer. Once the surface is covered with adsorbed molecules, it has no further influence on the system. The assumption that adsorption is limited to monolayer formation was explicitly made in writing Equations (72) and (73) for the saturation value of the ordinate. Ii is an experimental fact, however, that adsorption frequently proceeds to an extent that exceeds the monolayer capacity of the surface for any plausible molecular orientation at the surface. That is, if monolayer coverage is postulated, the apparent area per molecule is only a small fraction of any likely projected area of the actual molecules. In this case the assumption that adsorption is limited to the monolayer fails to apply. A model based on multilayer adsorption is indicated in this situation. This is easier to handle in the case of gas adsorption, so we defer until Chapter 9 a discussion of multilayer adsorption. [Pg.337]

Fig. 10. Detailed TRAF2-TRADD interaction. (A) Interaction surfaces and their locations on the individual structures (in red). (B) Molecular interactions at the two regions of the interactions. (C, D, E) Details of region I, region II and water-mediated interactions, respectively. (See Color Insert.)... Fig. 10. Detailed TRAF2-TRADD interaction. (A) Interaction surfaces and their locations on the individual structures (in red). (B) Molecular interactions at the two regions of the interactions. (C, D, E) Details of region I, region II and water-mediated interactions, respectively. (See Color Insert.)...
The electromagnetic field enhancement provided by nanostructure plasmonics is the key factor to manipulate the quantum efficiency. However, as it is illustrated in the unified theory of enhancement, since both the radiative and non-radiative rates of the molecular systems are affected by proximity of the nanostructure, the tuning has to be done on a case by case basis. In addition, there are factors due to molecule-metal interactions and molecular orientation at the surface causing effects that are much more molecule dependent and as are much more difficult to predict. Given the fact that fluorescence cross sections are the one of the highest in optical spectroscopy the analytical horizon of SEF or MEF is enormous, in particular in the expanding field of nano-bio science. [Pg.86]

Reaction or exchange with stable isotopic tracers and quantitative identification of all products by mass spectrometry provides indications for molecular interactions on the surface. Reactions can be studied at steady state or by following the transient distribution of isotopic products. Langer and co-workers (25,26) presented the first steady-state mechanistic analysis for the electrocatalytic hydrogenation of ethylene on Pt in deuterated electrolytes. Proton abstraction in electroorganic synthesis has also been verified using deuterated solvents (374, 375). On-line mass spectrometry permitted indirect identification of adsorbed radicals in benzene and propylene fuel cell reactions (755,795,194). Isotopic radiotracers provided some notion on adsorption isotherms (376, 377) and surface species on electrocatalysts (208, 378, 379). [Pg.302]

The differences between interfacial and bulk molecular interaction energies are due mainly to the two-dimensional geometry of the surface and also to differences in interfacial structure and differences in magnitude of the molecular interactions at the interface, from those of the bulk. In principle, it would be possible to calculate the energy of cohesion between molecules within a single phase if the potential energy functions and the spatial distributions of all the atoms and molecules were known. Moreover, if the complete... [Pg.84]

A type of angle-dependent x-ray photoemission spectroscopy was used to investigate the molecular orientation at the surface of sulfonated polystyrene as a function of reaction depth. A model based on these measurements indicates that at a critical sulfonation depth the aliphatic hydrocarbon backbone becomes exposed preferentially at the surface. These results are consistent with surface energy and tribo-electric charging measurements, which also reveal the effects of associative interactions in the form of conversion dependencies. [Pg.289]

In summary, through the use of a simple type of XPS(0), the molecular orientation at the surface of sulfonated PS films has been determined. In the more sulfonated films the sulfur and oxygen atoms reside preferentially below the surface, as their respective XPS(6) core-level signals decrease with increasing 0 faster than the matrix C(l ) signal. These results are corroborated by surface energy measurements that also indicate that the accessibility of the sulfonate groups depends on associative interactions in the solid. In particular, it appears that a preferential... [Pg.300]

In reality, the processes in the active sensor layer may be more complicated and the sensor response will be a superposition of several parallel or consecutive reactions. We will present some kinetic models that correspond to more complex molecular interactions at the sensor surface. [Pg.75]

Reinhard Schinke received his Ph.D. in physics in 1976 at the University of Kaiserslautern, Germany, working in the held of molecular collision theory. In 1980, after 1 year at the IBM research laboratory in San Jose, California, as a postdoc, he entered the department of molecular interactions at the Max-Planck Institute for Fluid Dynamics in Goettingen where he has remained since. His research switched from collisions to the area of photodissociation and more recently to unimolecular reactions. Currently he studies the recombination of ozone with particular emphasis on a dynamical explanation of the pronounced isotope effect, which has been observed both in the atmosphere and in the laboratory. Throughout his scientihc career, he has tried to understand experimental observations on the basis of accurate potential energy surfaces and exact dynamics calculations. [Pg.1255]

The detailed study of molecular mechanisms involved in adhesion requires an atomistic treatment of the substrate surfaces and their interaction with the organic components contained in the adhesive. Interesting aspects of the substrate-adhesive interaction include the preferential molecular orientation due to the interaction at the surface [1] or the influence of the initial stages of polymer grafting on the stability of polymer/metal interfaces [2]. The structure and composition of the interface can have a decisive effect on the properties of the re-... [Pg.19]


See other pages where Molecular interactions at the surface is mentioned: [Pg.113]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.1421]    [Pg.84]   


SEARCH



Interacting Surface

Interactions at surfaces

Molecular interactions

Molecular interactive

Molecular surface

© 2024 chempedia.info