Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfaces orbital interactions

The bond strength to transition metal surfaces decreases with increasing d-valence electron occupation. This is because more anti-bonding adsorbate-surface orbital interactions occur. It tends to decrease when moving downward along a column of the periodic table. [Pg.159]

In the approximation used here, 5, j = this could be appropriate if no electron transfer were possible between the electrons in the two interacting orbitals and the metal. A new situation appears for the situation sketched in Fig.(2.53). The doubly occupied surface orbital interacts with the doubly occupied adsorbate orbital... [Pg.118]

Fig. XVIII-16. A four-electron two-orbital interaction that a) has no net bonding in the free molecule but can be bonding to a metal surface if (b) the Fermi level is below the antibonding level. In the lower part of the figure, a zero-electron two-orbital situation (c) has no bonding but there can be bonding to a metal surface as in (d) if the Fermi level is above the bonding level. (From Ref. 160.)... Fig. XVIII-16. A four-electron two-orbital interaction that a) has no net bonding in the free molecule but can be bonding to a metal surface if (b) the Fermi level is below the antibonding level. In the lower part of the figure, a zero-electron two-orbital situation (c) has no bonding but there can be bonding to a metal surface as in (d) if the Fermi level is above the bonding level. (From Ref. 160.)...
The essence of this analysis involves being able to write each wavefunction as a combination of determinants each of which involves occupancy of particular spin-orbitals. Because different spin-orbitals interact differently with, for example, a colliding molecule, the various determinants will interact differently. These differences thus give rise to different interaction potential energy surfaces. [Pg.274]

An important contribution for the endo selectivity in the carho-Diels-Alder reaction is the second-order orbital interaction [1], However, no bonds are formed in the product for this interaction. For the BF3-catalyzed reaction of acrolein with butadiene the overlap population between Cl and C6 is only 0.018 in the NC-transi-tion state [6], which is substantially smaller than the interaction between C3 and O (0.031). It is also notable that the C3-0 bond distance, 2.588 A, is significant shorter than the C1-C6 bond length (2.96 A), of which the latter is the one formed experimentally. The NC-transition-state structure can also lead to formation of vinyldihydropyran, i.e. a hetero-Diels-Alder reaction has proceeded. The potential energy surface at the NC-transition-state structure is extremely flat and structure NCA (Fig. 8.6) lies on the surface-separating reactants from product [6]. [Pg.307]

Keywords Cycloadditions, Chemical orbital theory. Donor-acceptor interaction. Electron delocalization band. Electron transfer band, Erontier orbital. Mechanistic spectrum, NAD(P)H reactions. Orbital amplitude. Orbital interaction. Orbital phase. Pseudoexcitation band. Quasi-intermediate, Reactivity, Selectivity, Singlet oxygen. Surface reactions... [Pg.24]

The microscopic rate constant is derived from the quantum mechanical transition probability by considering the system to be initially present in one of the vibronic levels on the initial potential surface. The initial level is coupled by spin-orbit interaction to the manifold of vibronic levels belonging to the final potential surface. The microscopic rate constant is then obtained, following the Fermi-Golden rule, as ... [Pg.94]

A potential energy surface was computed for Berry pseudorotation in IrCl4N02- and Mn(CO)4NO the results confirm the qualitative conformational trends obtained from orbital interaction arguments. [Pg.31]

Both the Slater and the rrkm treatments are inappropriate for calculations of °°, since the dissociation is not characterized by a critical extension of one bond, but rather by the transition from one potential surface to another. In such a case the observed activation energy at high pressures will be lower than the energy threshold for reaction110. From their high-pressure data Olschewski et a/.109 calculate that E0 = 63 kcaLmole-1 and that the transition matrix-element is 100 caLmole-1, which is in good agreement with the spin-orbit interaction term for O atoms. [Pg.70]

A quantitative treatment of tt complex formation is, however, more complicated, since it is generally recognized that all three wave functions are necessary for an accurate description of the bond. For instance, it has been pointed out by Orgel (27) that n complex stability cannot solely be the result of n electron donation into empty metal d orbitals, since d and ions (Cu+, Ag+, Ni , Rh+, Pt , Pd++) form some of the strongest complexes with poor bases such as ethylene, tt Complex stability would thus appear to involve the significant back-donation of metal d electrons into vacant antibonding orbitals of the olefin. Because of the additional complication of back-donation plus the uncertainty of metal surface orbitals, it is only possible to give a qualitative treatment of this interaction at the present time. [Pg.100]

Figure 4.2. Schematic diagrams of (a) molecule-molecule orbital interactions and (b) molecule-metallic surface interactions. Cases (c), (d) and (e) represent the 1, 3 and 4 molecule-metallic surface interactions, respectively. Adapted from Hoffmann, 1988. Figure 4.2. Schematic diagrams of (a) molecule-molecule orbital interactions and (b) molecule-metallic surface interactions. Cases (c), (d) and (e) represent the 1, 3 and 4 molecule-metallic surface interactions, respectively. Adapted from Hoffmann, 1988.
Side reactions specific to one component play an important role in the reforming of a mixture. For example, aromatics are more prone to coking upon reforming, so their presence in a mixture can lower syngas yields over time due to catalyst deactivation. Also, the catalyst surface-component interactions may play an important role in the reforming of a mixture. For example, aromatics have an abundance of 71-electrons, so they may occupy active sites for a longer duration, due to 71-complexation between d-orbitals of the metal and 7i-elec-trons. Hence there will not be enough reactive sites available for the desired reaction to occur. [Pg.253]

When an atom or molecule is adsorbed on a surface new electronic states are formed due to the bonding to the surface. The nature of the surface chemical bond will determine the properties and reactivity of the adsorbed molecule. In the case of physisorption, the bond is rather weak, of the order of 0.3 eV. The overlap of the wave functions of the molecule and the substrate is rather small and no major change in the electronic structure is usually observed. On the contrary, when the interaction energy is substantially higher, there are rearrangements of the valence levels of the molecule, a process often denoted chemisorption. The discrete molecular orbitals interact with the substrate to produce a new set of electronic levels, which are usually broadened and shifted with respect to the gas phase species. In some cases completely new electronic levels emerge which have no resemblance to the original orbitals of the free molecule. [Pg.57]

Figure 9.1. Two-electron, two-orbital interaction of an alkyl halide a orbital (LUMO) and the nonbonded orbital, n, of a nucleophile (a) most favorable approach (b) unfavorable front-side approach on nodal surface. Figure 9.1. Two-electron, two-orbital interaction of an alkyl halide a orbital (LUMO) and the nonbonded orbital, n, of a nucleophile (a) most favorable approach (b) unfavorable front-side approach on nodal surface.

See other pages where Surfaces orbital interactions is mentioned: [Pg.158]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.284]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.107 , Pg.111 ]




SEARCH



Interacting Surface

Orbital interactions on a surface

Surface orbitals

© 2024 chempedia.info