Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction with

At pressures to a few bars, the vapor phase is at a relatively low density, i.e., on the average, the molecules interact with one another less strongly than do the molecules in the much denser liquid phase. It is therefore a common simplification to assume that all the nonideality in vapor-liquid systems exist in the liquid phase and that the vapor phase can be treated as an ideal gas. This leads to the simple result that the fugacity of component i is given by its partial pressure, i.e. the product of y, the mole fraction of i in the vapor, and P, the total pressure. A somewhat less restrictive simplification is the Lewis fugacity rule which sets the fugacity of i in the vapor mixture proportional to its mole fraction in the vapor phase the constant of proportionality is the fugacity of pure i vapor at the temperature and pressure of the mixture. These simplifications are attractive because they make the calculation of vapor-liquid equilibria much easier the K factors = i i ... [Pg.25]

A component in a vapor mixture exhibits nonideal behavior as a result of molecular interactions only when these interactions are very wea)c or very infrequent is ideal behavior approached. The fugacity coefficient (fi is a measure of nonideality and a departure of < ) from unity is a measure of the extent to which a molecule i interacts with its neighbors. The fugacity coefficient depends on pressure, temperature, and vapor composition this dependence, in the moderate pressure region covered by the truncated virial equation, is usually as follows ... [Pg.37]

The main advantage of this approach is that the designer can keep control of the basic decisions and interact with the design as it develops. By sta dng in control of the basic decisions, the intangibles of the design can be included in the decision making. [Pg.9]

Poiar stationary phases which have a polar moment. These phases interact with the dipoiar moments of poiar components themselves and those components capable of induced polarization such as aromatics. [Pg.21]

The model is predictive and uses a method of contributing groups to determine the parameters of interaction with water. It is generally used by simulation programs such as HYSIM or PR02. Nevertheless the accuracy of the model is limited and the average error is about 40%. Use the results with caution. [Pg.170]

Reservoir rocks are either of clastic or carbonate composition. The former are composed of silicates, usually sandstone, the latter of biogenetically derived detritus, such as coral or shell fragments. There are some important differences between the two rock types which affect the quality of the reservoir and its interaction with fluids which flow through them. [Pg.13]

These constants are dependent upon pressure, temperature and also the composition of the hydrocarbon fluid, as the various components within the system will interact with each other. K values can be found in gas engineering data books. The basic separation process is similar for oil and gas production, though the relative amounts of each phase differ. [Pg.243]

Modelling of Eddy-Current Interaction with Cracks in the Thin-Skin Regime Two Approaches. [Pg.140]

When tbe skin depth is of the same magnitude as the slot depth, the eddy current interaction with slot can lead to a deviation of currents that are able to pass under an inner defect, deeper in the block. In that case the interaction is not total, and the signal is smoothed. [Pg.145]

Zone 1 The probe is far away form the slot the interaction with the slot is low. The impedance change is small. This situation is tme until the probe reaches the edge of the slot. The range of the zone is [- x 1 ]... [Pg.146]

Zone 4 The area of coverage interacting with the slot increase. The impedance change increases. This situation is true over the probe depth, that is to say until the all the length of the probe is over the slot. The range of the zone is [x3 x4]... [Pg.146]

N. Flarfield and J. R. Bowler, Theory of thin-skin eddy-current interaction with surface cracks, J. Appl. Phys., 82(9), 4590 - 4603, 1997. [Pg.147]

J. R. Bowler and N. Flarfield, Evaluation of prohe impedance due to thin-skin eddy-eurrent interaction with surface cracks, IEEE Trans. Mag., accepted. [Pg.147]

In the last years one can find a strong reorientation of most microscopical methods to study objects in natural (or adjustable) conditions without preparation. Microscopical visualization without vacuum and coating allows maintaining the natural specimen structure as well as examining its behavior under external influences (loading, chemical reactions, interaction with other solids, liquids, gases etc.)... [Pg.579]

Then, the weld depths penetration are controlled in a pulse-echo configuration because the weld bead (of width 2 mm) disturbs the detection when the pump and the probe beams are shifted of 2.2 mm. The results are presented in figure 8 (identical experimental parameters as in figure 7). The slow propagation velocities for gold-nickel alloy involve that the thermal component does not overlap the ultrasonic components, in particular for the echo due to the interaction with a lack of weld penetration. The acoustic response (V shape) is still well observed both for the slot of height 1.7 mm and for a weld depth penetration of 0.8 mm (lack of weld penetration of 1.7 mm), even with the weld bead. This is hopeful with regard to the difficulties encountered by conventional ultrasound in the case of the weld depths penetration. [Pg.698]

The beam-defect interaction is modelled using Kirchhoff s diffraction theory applied to elastodynamics. This theory (see [10] for the scattering by cracks and [11] for the scattering by volumetric flaws) gives the amplitude of the scattered wave in the fonn of coefficients after interaction with defects and takes account of the possible mode-conversion that may occur. [Pg.738]

The next point of interest has to do with the question of how deep the surface region or region of appreciably unbalanced forces is. This depends primarily on the range of intermolecular forces and, except where ions are involved, the principal force between molecules is of the so-called van der Waals type (see Section VI-1). This type of force decreases with about the seventh power of the intermolecular distance and, consequently, it is only the first shell or two of nearest neighbors whose interaction with a given molecule is of importance. In other words, a molecule experiences essentially symmetrical forces once it is a few molecular diameters away from the surface, and the thickness of the surface region is of this order of magnitude (see Ref. 23, for example). (Certain aspects of this conclusion need modification and are discussed in Sections X-6C and XVII-5.)... [Pg.56]

Theoretical models of the film viscosity lead to values about 10 times smaller than those often observed [113, 114]. It may be that the experimental phenomenology is not that supposed in derivations such as those of Eqs. rV-20 and IV-22. Alternatively, it may be that virtually all of the measured surface viscosity is developed in the substrate through its interactions with the film (note Fig. IV-3). Recent hydrodynamic calculations of shape transitions in lipid domains by Stone and McConnell indicate that the transition rate depends only on the subphase viscosity [115]. Brownian motion of lipid monolayer domains also follow a fluid mechanical model wherein the mobility is independent of film viscosity but depends on the viscosity of the subphase [116]. This contrasts with the supposition that there is little coupling between the monolayer and the subphase [117] complete explanation of the film viscosity remains unresolved. [Pg.120]

Calculate y for naphthalene assume that it interacts with water only with dispersion forces. [Pg.382]

All gases below their critical temperature tend to adsorb as a result of general van der Waals interactions with the solid surface. In this case of physical adsorption, as it is called, interest centers on the size and nature of adsorbent-adsorbate interactions and on those between adsorbate molecules. There is concern about the degree of heterogeneity of the surface and with the extent to which adsorbed molecules possess translational and internal degrees of freedom. [Pg.571]

The preceding material has been couched in terms of site energy distributions—the implication being that an adsorbent may have chemically different kinds of sites. This is not necessarily the case—if micropores are present (see Section XVII-16) adsorption in such may show an increased Q because the adsorbate experiences interaction with surrounding walls of adsorbent. To a lesser extent this can also be true for a nonporous but very rough surface. [Pg.660]

Notice in Table XVIII-1 a value for the self-diffusion of Ni on Ni(lll) measured using radioactive Ni. More gross processes can occur. Supported Ni crystallites (on alumina) may show spreading and wetting phenomena due to complex interactions with the substrate [146]. [Pg.711]


See other pages where Interaction with is mentioned: [Pg.22]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.738]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.703]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2570 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info