Microextraction

Schematic of a liquid-liquid microextraction showing syringe needle with attached 1-pL droplet.

Solid-phase microextractions also have been developed. In one approach, a fused silica fiber is placed inside a syringe needle. The fiber, which is coated with a thin organic film, such as poly(dimethyl siloxane), is lowered into the sample by depressing a plunger and exposed to the sample for a predetermined time. The fiber is then withdrawn into the needle and transferred to a gas chromatograph for analysis. 

Caffeine is extracted from beverages by a solid-phase microextraction using an uncoated fused silica fiber. The fiber is suspended in the sample for 5 min and the sample stirred to assist the mass transfer of analyte to the fiber. Immediately after removing the fiber from the sample it is transferred to the gas chromatograph s injection port where the analyte is thermally desorbed. Quantitation is accomplished by using a C3 caffeine solution as an internal standard. 

Pawliszyn, J. Solid-Phase Microextraction Theory and Practice, Wiley NewYork, 1997. 

Schematic diagram of a device for solid-phase microextractions.

Caffeine in coffee, tea, and soda is determined by a solid-phase microextraction using an uncoated silica fiber, followed by a GC analysis using a capillary SPB-5 column with an MS detector. Standard solutions are spiked with G3 caffeine as an internal standard. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was used for headspace sampling. The FFA were extracted from the headspace with PA, Car/PDMS, and CW/DVB fibers. It was examined whether addition of salt (NaCl) and decreasing the pH by addition of sulphuric acid (H SO ) increased the sensitivity. FFA were analyzed using gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in selected ion monitoring. 

In recent decades the development of preconcentration steps to be implemented prior to analytical determinations of trace level compounds has been explored in considerable depth. With a view to eliminating or at least minimising the use of organic solvents used in conventional liquid-liquid extraction, other methodologies have been developed, such as membrane extraction, solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, etc. 

SOLID-PHASE MICROEXTRACTION COUPLED WITH GAS OR LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY... 

Although solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has only been introduced comparatively recently (134), it has already generated much interest and popularity. SPME is based on the equilibrium between an aqueous sample and a stationary phase coated on a fibre that is mounted in a syringe-like protective holder. Eor extraction, the fibre... 

Figure 11.14 Analysis of amphetamines by GC-NPD following HS-SPME exti action from human hair (a) Normal hair (b) normal hair after addition of amphetamine (1.5 ng) and methamphetamine (16.1 ng) (c) hair of an amphetamine abuser. Peak identification is as follows 1, a-phenethylamine (internal standard) 2, amphetamine 3, methamphetamine 4, N-propyl-/3-phenethyamine (internal standard). Reprinted from Journal of Chronatography, B 707,1. Koide et ai, Determination of amphetamine and methamphetamine in human hair by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas cliromatography with niti ogen-phosphoms detection, pp. 99 -104, copyright 1998, with permission from Elsevier Science.

S. Ulrich and J. Maitens, Solid-phase microextraction with capillai y gas-liquid cliro-matography and niti ogen-phosphoi us selective detection foi the assay of antidepressant drugs in human plasma , J. Chromatogr. B 696 217-234 (1997). 

J. Pawliszyn, Applications of Solid Phase Microextraction, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK (1999). 

A recent method, still in development, for determining total 4-nitrophenol in the urine of persons exposed to methyl parathion is based on solid phase microextraction (SPME) and GC/MS previously, the method... 

A recent method, still in development, for determining total 4-nitrophenol in the urine of persons exposed to methyl parathion is based on solid phase microextraction (SPME) and GC/MS previously, the method has been used in the analysis of food and environmental samples (Guidotti et al. 1999). The method uses a solid phase microextraction fiber, is inserted into the urine sample that has been hydrolyzed with HCl at 50° C prior to mixing with distilled water and NaCl and then stirred (1,000 rpm). The fiber is left in the liquid for 30 minutes until a partitioning equilibrium is achieved, and then placed into the GC injector port to desorb. The method shows promise for use in determining exposures at low doses, as it is very sensitive. There is a need for additional development of this method, as the measurement of acetylcholinesterase, the enzyme inhibited by exposure to organophosphates such as methyl parathion, is not an effective indicator of low-dose exposures. 

Magdic S, Pawliszyn JB. 1996. Analysis of organochlorine pesticides using solid-phase microextraction. J Chromatogr A723(l) lll-122. 

Lu, G. et al.. Quantitative determination of geosmin in red beets (Beta vulgaris L.) using headspace solid-phase microextraction, J. Agric. Food Chem., 51, 1021, 2003. 

Shen, S. et al.. Comparison of solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction, steam distillation, and solvent extraction techniques for analysis of volatile consituents in Fructus amomi, J. AOAC Int., 88, 418, 2005. 

Pretreatment of hair samples also includes an extraction, usually with an alkaline sodium hydroxide solution, followed by cleaning up with LLE with n-hexane/ethyl acetate. Instead of LLE, the employment of SPE is also possible. Furthermore, the solid phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with head-space analysis is usable [104-106]. In the case of using hair samples, possible external contamination (e.g., by passive smoking of Cannabis) has to be considered as false positive result. False positive results can be avoided by washing of the hair samples previous to extraction [107]. Storage of collected samples is another important fact that can cause false results in their content of A9-THC and metabolites [108-110]. 

Alissandrakis, E., Tarantalis, P. A., Harizanis, P. C., and Polissiou, M. (2007). Aroma investigation of untfloral Greek citrus honey using solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis. Food Chem. 100, 396-404. 

Soria, A. C., Martmez-Castro, I., and Sanz, J. (2003). Analysis of volatile composition of honey by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. /. Sep. Sci. 26, 793-801. 

Several extraction methods for water samples are applicable, such as solvent extraction, SPE using a cartridge and disk and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). 

The most widely employed techniques for the extraction of water samples for triazine compounds include liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and liquid-solid extraction (LSE). Although most reports involving SPE are off-line procedures, there is increasing interest and subsequently increasing numbers of reports regarding on-line SPE, the goal of which is to improve overall productivity and safety. To a lesser extent, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), supercritical fluid extraction (SEE), semi-permeable membrane device (SPMD), and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) techniques have been reported. 

GCB = graphitized carbon black SPME = solid-phase microextraction PDMS = polydimethylsiloxane PS = polystyrene DVB = divinylbenzene SDB = styrene-divinylbenzene. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) consists of dipping a fiber into an aqueous sample to adsorb the analytes followed by thermal desorption into the carrier stream for GC, or, if the analytes are thermally labile, they can be desorbed into the mobile phase for LC. Examples of commercially available fibers include 100-qm PDMS, 65-qm Carbowax-divinylbenzene (CW-DVB), 75-qm Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CX-PDMS), and 85-qm polyacrylate, the last being more suitable for the determination of triazines. The LCDs can be as low as 0.1 qgL Since the quantity of analyte adsorbed on the fiber is based on equilibrium rather than extraction, procedural recovery cannot be assessed on the basis of percentage extraction. The robustness and sensitivity of the technique were demonstrated in an inter-laboratory validation study for several parent triazines and DEA and DIA. A 65-qm CW-DVB fiber was employed for analyte adsorption followed by desorption into the injection port (split/splitless) of a gas chromatograph. The sample was adjusted to neutral pH, and sodium chloride was added to obtain a concentration of 0.3 g During continuous... 

The need to understand the fate of pesticides in the environment has necessitated the development of analytical methods for the determination of residues in environmental media. Adoption of methods utilizing instrumentation such as gas chro-matography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has allowed the detection of minute amounts of pesticides and their degradation products in environmental samples. Sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have also been important in the development of more reliable and sensitive analytical methods. 

During the last few years, miniaturization has become a dominant trend in the analysis of low-level contaminants in food and environmental samples. This has resulted in a significant reduction in the volume of hazardous and expensive solvents. Typical examples of miniaturization in sample preparation techniques are micro liquid/liquid extractions (in-vial) and solvent-free techniques such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Combined with state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation, this trend has resulted in faster analyses, higher sample throughputs and lower solvent consumption, whilst maintaining or even increasing assay sensitivity. 

---