Solid phase extraction microextraction with

Fattahi, N., S. Samadi, Y. Assadi, and M. R. M. Hosseini. 2007. Solid-phase extraction combined with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction-ultra preconcentration of chlorophenols in aqueous samples. J. Chromatogr. A 1169 63-69. 

In recent decades the development of preconcentration steps to be implemented prior to analytical determinations of trace level compounds has been explored in considerable depth. With a view to eliminating or at least minimising the use of organic solvents used in conventional liquid-liquid extraction, other methodologies have been developed, such as membrane extraction, solid-phase extraction, solid-phase microextraction, etc. 

Experiments to identify disinfection by-products (DBFs) have been carried out using two different procedures. In the first, natural waters (e.g., river, lake) are reacted with the disinfectant, either in a pilot plant, an actual treatment plant, or in a controlled laboratory smdy. fii the second type of procedure, aquatic humic material is isolated and reacted with the disinfectant in purified water in a controlled laboratory study. This latter type of study is relevant because humic material is an important precursor of THMs and other DBFs. Aquatic humic material is present in nearly all natural waters, and isolated humic material reacts with disinfectants to produce most of the same DBFs found from natural waters. Because DBFs are typically formed at low levels (ng/L-pg/L), samples are usually concentrated to allow for DBF detection. Concentration methods that are commonly used include solid phase extraction (SFE), solid phase microextraction (SFME), liquid-liquid extraction, and XAD resin extraction (for larger quantities of water) [9]. 

Fig. 18.1 Systems used to absorb aroma compounds from samples for analytical purposes, a Traps loaded with various adsorbents [4]. b Solid-phase extraction (disk in a holder assembly) [5]. c Solid-phase microextraction (coated needle inserted in sample) [5]. d Twister (1 -cm length) [4]. (Courtesy of GERSTEL GmbH and Co. KG)...

Aqueous samples are extracted with hexane or with methylene chloride by liquid-liquid extraction using a separatory funnel or a mechanical shaker, or by microextraction. Aqueous samples can also be extracted by solid phase extraction using a C-18 cartridge. Selection of sample volume should be based on the extent of sample concentration that may be needed to achieve the required detection level in the analysis, as well as the use of packed or capillary column. A larger sample concentration is required for packed column than that for capillary column analysis. U.S. EPA recommends the extraction of 1 L sample to a final volume of 1 mL for wastewater analysis performed on a packed column. For the analysis of potable water by GC-ECD on a capillary column, concentration of a 35-mL... 

Lopez-Bianco, M.C., S. Blanco-Cid, B. Cancho-Grande, and J. Simal-Gandara. 2003. Application of single-drop microextraction and comparison with solid-phase microextraction and solid-phase extraction for the determination of a- and [1-endosulfan in water samples by gas chromatography-electron-capture detection. J. Chromatogr. A 984 245-252. 

Maurer has reviewed the application of LC-MS and LC-MS/MS to the detection of alkaloids in human biofluids [14]. Extraction techniques include liquid-liquid extraction relying upon the ionization of alkaloids in aqueous acid, solid phase extraction (SPE) in which alkaloids are cleaned up and concentrated from the biomatrix by adsorption and subsequent elution from a small cartridge of solid phase adsorbent, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), in which analytes are adsorbed directly from the matrix or the headspace above the heated matrix onto a fine fiber of adsorbent on fused silica. The latter process is more commonly used with GC-M S but is finding increasing use with LC-MS. 

Sample preparation is important here because matrices of biological fluids are so comphcated that interfering signals are likely to appear in typical separation-based determinations. Among various sample preparation techniques, there are two major approaches combined with CE liquid-hquid extraction (LEE) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [or solid-phase microextraction (SPME)]. 

Sample preparation represents a formidable challenge in the chemical analysis of the real-world samples. Not only is the majority of total analysis time spent in sample preparation, but also it is the most error-prone, least glamorous, and the most labor-intensive task in the laboratory. The components to be separated from the matrix are usually taken up with an auxiliary substance such as a carrier gas, an organic solvent, or an adsorbent. These separation processes can be regarded as extraction procedures (i.e., liquid-liquid extraction, liquid-solid extraction, Soxhlet extraction, solid-phase extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, solid-phase microextraction, etc.). 

Generally, preconcentration of pollutants from water samples and sample preparation steps are accomplished by extraction techniques based on enrichment of liquid phase (liquid/liquid extraction) or solid phase (solid/liquid extraction) ". Historically, liq-uid/liquid extraction (LEE) was used exclusively to enrich phenols from water samples. LEE is still used as a preconcentration step . However, there is an increasing tendency to replace LEE by solid phase extraction (SPE) and solid phase microextraction (SPME). Among the reasons for replacing LEE are foam formation, the large volume of organic solvents needed, the length of the analysis time and difficulties in the automation of LEE procedures. On the other hand, SPE requires incomparable smaller amounts of solvents (SPME requires no solvent at all) and can be easily automated . Finally, SPE and SPME are cheaper in comparison with LEE. 

The focus in Chapters 7 and 8 is on the specific sample preparation approaches available for the extraction of organic compounds from environmental matrices, principally soil and water. Chapter 7 is concerned with the role of Soxhlet, ultrasonic and shake-flask extraction on the removal of organic compounds from solid (soil) matrices. These techniques are contrasted with newer developments in sample preparation for organic compound extraction, namely supercritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and pressurized fluid extraction. Chapter 8 is arranged in a similar manner. Initially, details are provided on the use of solvent extraction for organic compounds removal from aqueous samples. This is followed by descriptions of the newer approaches, namely solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction. 

Recently, rotundone was identified as a pepper aroma impact compound in Shiraz grapes (Siebert et al.,2008). Identification was achieved by performing GC-MS analysis of grape juice after purification by solid-phase extraction (SPE) using a styrene-divinylbenzene 500-mg cartridge and elution with n-pentane/ethyl acetate 9 1, followed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) using a 65-pm polydimethylsilox-ane-divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB) fiber immersed in the sample for 60 min at 35 °C. J5-Rotundone was used as an internal standard. The structure of the compound is reported in Fig. 4.5. 

Several SP materials have been used for the extraction of FRs from aqueous samples, plasma and milk (Table 31.7). Similar materials have been used for all FRs. Typical SP materials include Ci8 and Cg bonded to porous silica, highly cross-linked poly(styrene divinylbenzene) (PS-DVB), and graphitized carbon black (GCB). It is also possible to use XAD-2 resin for extraction of various FRs, pesticides, and plastic additives from large volumes of water (100 1). The analytes can then be either eluted from the resin by acetone hexane mixture, or Soxhlet extracted with acetone and hexane. For a specific determination of diphenyl phosphate in water and urine, molecularly imprinted polymers have been used in the solid phase extraction. The imprinted polymer was prepared using 2-vinylpyridine as the functional monomer, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as the cross linker, and a structural analog of the analyte as the template molecule. Elution was done with methanol triethylamine as solvent. Also solid phase microextraction (SPME) has been applied in the analysis of PBDEs in water samples. The extraction has been done from a headspace of a heated water sample (100°C) using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or polyacryl (PA) as the fiber material. ... 

Various extraction techniques are applied to isolate EDCs in aqueous samples, such as liquid-liquid extraction (LEE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and solid-phase microextraction (SPME). LEE is frequently used in the extraction of EDCs with water immiscible organic solvents, most... 

The sample introduction system must be capable of introducing a known and variable volume of sample solution reproducibly into the pressurized mobile phase as a sharp plug without adversely affecting the efficiency of the column. The superiority of valve injection has been adequately demonstrated for this purpose and is now universally used in virtually all modern instruments for both manual and automated sample introduction systems [1,2,7,31,32]. Earlier approaches using septum-equipped injectors have passed into disuse for a several reasons, such as limited pressure capability, poor resealability, contamination of the mobile phase, disruption of the column packing, etc., but mainly because they were awkward and inconvenient to use compared with valves. For dilute sample solutions volume overload restricts the maximum sample volume that can be introduced onto the column without a dramatic loss of performance. On-column or precolumn sample focusing mechanisms can be exploited as a trace enrichment technique to enhance sample detectability. Solid-phase extraction and in-column solid-phase microextraction provide a convenient mechanism for isolation, concentration and matrix simplification that are easily interfaced to a liquid chromatograph for fully or semi-automated analysis of complex samples (section 5.3.2). 

Rellan, S., Osswald, J., Vasconcelos, V., and Gago-Martinez, A. (2007). Analysis of anatoxin-a in biological samples using liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection after solid phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction. J. Chromatogr. A, 1156, 134—140. 

Solid-Phase Microextraction and Solid Phase Extraction with Capillary Electrophoresis and Related Techniques... 

In lab-scale SWE, separation of the compounds from the aqueous extract obtained is the critical stage. A liquid-liquid extraction technique often causes emulsion and breaking this can be very difficult. It has been found that solid phase extraction is a better technique for the removal of compounds from the aqueous environment of SWE when comp>ared with liquid-liquid extraction (Rovio et al., 1999 Ozel et al., 2003). Headspace solid phase microextraction with GC-MS may be another alternative (Deng et al., 2005). 

Analytical quantification of BAs may be difficult due to the complexity of some food matrices and the low concentrations of BAs generally encountered in the majority of foodstuffs. In addition, the low volatility of these compounds and the lack of chromophores for most of the BAs, does not allow the rapid direct detection by ultraviolet and visible (UV and vis) spectrometric or fluorimetric (FL) methods. In general, in order to obtain an optimal analysis, extraction, clean-up, concentration, and derivat-ization procedures are required. Extraction methods usually based on liquid-liquid or solid-phase extraction with C18 or ion-exchange cartridges can be applied to improve selectivity and sensitivity (Giannotti et al., 2008 Pena-Gallego, Hemdndez-Orte, Cacho, Ferreira, 2009). Alternative approaches, such as solid-phase microextraction... 

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) has been used in conjunction with separation techniques [gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), and capillary electrophoresis (CE)] for environmental analysis. Recent developments in both SPE and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have been reviewed. Some of the solid phases investigated previously include graphitized carbon black, octadecylsilica, and Ci8 cartridges. Comparisons of the sorbent materials available for the extraction of phenols have been carried out in conjunction with chromatographic separations. A comparison of polycrystalline graphites and SPME fibers [poly (dimethyl... 

Extraction of pesticide residues from liquid samples can be performed using a solid sorbent material. Currently available sorbent extraction techniques include (1) solid-phase extraction (SPE), (2) solid-phase microextraction (SPME), and (3) stir-bar sorptive extraction (SBSE). In the case of solid samples, a liquid extraction of pesticide residues (transfer into a solution) usually precedes the sorption step thus, it should be considered rather as a clean-up than an extraction. Matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) represents a unique SPE approach that combines extraction and clean-up of solid or semisolid food samples in one step. In MSPD, the sample is mixed with a sorbent (Florisil, Cig, Cg) that serves as a solid support in sample disruption and dispersion. The resulting mix is packed into a column from which the analytes are eluted while separated matrix components are retained by the sorbent. The main drawbacks of this approach comprise rather small sample sizes ( 0.5g) and a relatively high consumption of expensive sorbents. 

---