Exposure determination

Exposure determination involves listing all job classifications in which employees could encounter potential exposure. This includes physicians, nurses, and other clinical personnel. Maintenance, environmental services, and laundry personnel can work in situations that could pose exposure risks. List any specific procedures or tasks in which exposiffe could occur without regard to the use ofPPE. 

Employers should take appropriate preventative measures against occupational exposure. These include engineering controls and work practice controls. Examples of engineering controls include biohazard hoods, puncture-resistant sharps containers, mechanical pipette devices, and other devices that permanently remove the hazard or isolate individuals from exposure. Organizations must evaluate and incorporate new safer devices including needleless devices, needles with sheaths, and blunt suture needles. Work practice controls must include hand washing policies, sharps handling procedures, proper waste disposal techniques, and other actions that would reduce the likelihood of exposure. 

---

Table 4.35 Adopted biological exposure determinants (ACCIH)...

Amvig E, Grandjean P, Beckmann J. 1980. Neurotoxic effects of heavy lead exposure determined with psychological tests. Toxicol Lett 5 399-404. 

Fast neutron exposure determined by counting individual proton recoil tracks. 

For topical exposures, determining absorption (into the skin and into the systemic circulation) requires a different set of techniques. For determining how much material is left, skin washing is required. There are two components to skin washing in the recovery of chemicals. The first component is the physical rubbing and removal from the skin surface. The second component is the surfactant action of soap and water. However, the addition of soap effects the partitioning. Some compounds may require multiple successive washing with soap and water applications for removal from skin. 

LB Willett Ohio State University, Wooster, OH Cattle methods to detect and monitor occurrence of potentially hazardous xenobiotics in their environment methods to reduce or eliminate exposure determine mechanisms by which xenobiotics are transported, bound, and mobilized study target organ modification caused by xenobiotic chemicals U. S. Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research Service... 

For a fire thermal radiation, heat flux, and the duration of exposure determine the severity of injury or damage. 

Many OSHA standards and those being proposed include monitoring requirements consisting of preliminary surveys to determine whether the exposure is above or below the "Action Level." The Action Level (AL) is one-half the treshold limit value (TLV). If an exposure falls above the AL, it must be monitored at least every two months. If two consecutive exposure measurements taken at least one week apart result in a measurement which is lower than the AL, monitoring may be terminated. A generalized flowchart for exposure determination... 

Figure 4. NIOSH-recommended employee exposure determination and measurement strategy. 2...

Figure 3.2 NIOSH-recommended employee exposure determination and measurement strategy. AL — action level PEL = permissible exposure limit. OSH A Laboratory Standard 29 CFR 1910.1450 requires employee notification of any monitoring results...

The clinical and epidemiological evidence is summarized below. The deficiencies in the studies include the lack of appropriate sampling techniques, exposure determinations, mortality standards, and other aspects of experimental design or methodology. Additionally, intermittent exposures to benzene made it difficult to assume that the average concentrations of benzene measured in a workplace actually indicated the true exposure experienced by each worker (Goldstein 1985). A cause-effect relationship between benzene and leukemia is sufficiently clear however, there are few data from which dose-response relationships can be established. 

The observed pharmacodynamic response is the result of extent of drug exposure determined by drug pharmacokinetics (Table 24.2) and sensitivity... 

There is a dose-response continuum. The magnitude and duration of the exposure determines the response, which can range from subtle change to frank malformation to death. 

The route of exposure determines both the initial physiological barrier faced by the xenobiotic and its initial metabolic fate. Two of the primary defense mechanisms against xenobiotics are barriers, such as skin and membranes, and the biotransformation or breakdown of toxic compounds to nontoxic products. Xenobiotics must elude these defense mechanisms in order to reach the target tissue and cause damage. 

If a compound induces a2u-globulin accumulation in hyaline droplets, the associated nephropathy in male rats is not an appropriate end point to determine noncancer (systemic) effects potentially occurring in humans. Likewise, quantitative estimates of noncancer risk (e.g., reference doses and margin-of-exposure determinations) are based on other end points. 

Hardwood Plywood Manufacturers Association, Comments before the Environmental Protection Agency, regulatory investigation of formaldehyde exposures determined to be within section 4(f) of the toxic substances control act, 1984. 

Qualitative Estimation Methods. Qualitative techniques have also been used to conduct or refine exposure reconstructions. The use of exposure determinants to classify exposures is a technique that has been performed qualitatively in some cases based on available data. Other qualitative techniques can include the use of expert or professional judgment and self-reported exposures. While self-reported exposures have been found to be convenient and helpful when no other exposure information is available, the method has been shown in at least one validation study to be inadequate for use as the sole data source in an exposure reconstruction. When self-reported exposures have been compared to professional judgments by experts, they have been found to have high specificity but low sensitivity (Fritschi et al. 1996). 

Put 10 milliliters (ml) of the solution into a 20 ml colorless ampoule, seal it hermetically, and use this as the sample. Separately, put 10 ml of the solution into a 20 ml colourless ampoule, seal it hermetically, wrap in aluminum foil to protect completely from light, and use this as the control. Expose the sample and control to the light source for an appropriate number of hours. After exposure determine the absorbances of the sample (Ax) and the control (A ,) at 400 nm using a 1 centimeter (cm) pathlength. Calculate the change in absorbance, AA = Ax - A0. The length of exposure should be sufficient to ensure a change in absorbance of at least 0.9. 

---