Extraction techniques solid phase microextraction

Among the numerous techniques for separating and enriching organic compounds from water samples, the following are worthy of mention solid-phase extraction (SPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME), liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and lyophilization. 

Another alternative technique, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), was used for the determination of fluoxetine [79] and several TCAs [80], SPME is a miniaturized and solvent-free technique, where analytes are extracted from the sample by adsorption on a thin polymer coating fixed to the solid surface of a fiber, located inside an injection needle or a capillary. Its main disadvantage is that special strategies are needed to couple SPME to the LC-MS analysis. 

Preinjection sample preparation is not a chromatographic issue per se. Nevertheless, it is an important consideration in the successful application of a complete analytical process. Nerin et al. reviewed sample treatment techniques applicable to polymer extract analysis, including headspace methods, supercritical fluid extraction, and solid phase microextraction. 

The focus in Chapters 7 and 8 is on the specific sample preparation approaches available for the extraction of organic compounds from environmental matrices, principally soil and water. Chapter 7 is concerned with the role of Soxhlet, ultrasonic and shake-flask extraction on the removal of organic compounds from solid (soil) matrices. These techniques are contrasted with newer developments in sample preparation for organic compound extraction, namely supercritical fluid extraction, microwave-assisted extraction and pressurized fluid extraction. Chapter 8 is arranged in a similar manner. Initially, details are provided on the use of solvent extraction for organic compounds removal from aqueous samples. This is followed by descriptions of the newer approaches, namely solid-phase extraction and solid-phase microextraction. 

One more trend that is worth mentioning is the miniaturization of sample preparation techniques. Solid phase microextraction is one good example of where very small samples are consumed and very small extracts are produced. Solid phase extractions can also be scaled down by reducing the bed volume or by use of coated membranes. Likewise liquid-liquid extractions can be scaled down conserving both sample and solvent. 

Microwave-assisted desorption coupled to in situ headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) was first proposed as a possible alternative pretreatment of samples collected from workplace monitoring. Therefore, pretreatment that takes a short time and uses little or no organic solvents has led to the recent development of a new extraction technique. Solid-phase micro-extraction (SPME) coupled with GC analysis has been used successfully to analyze pollutants in environmental matrices. MHS has been developed to achieve one-step, in situ headspace sampling of semivolatile organic compounds in aqueous samples, vegetables, and soil [7, 55-58]. 

The search of adequate extraction techniques allowing the identification and quantification of wine volatile compounds has attracted the attention of many scientists. This has resulted in the availability of a wide range of analytical tools for the extraction of these compounds from wine. These methodologies are mainly based on the solubility of the compounds in organic solvents (liquid-liquid extraction LLE, simultaneous distillation liquid extraction SDE), on their volatility (static and dynamic headspace techniques), or based on their sorptive/adsorptive capacity on polymeric phases (solid phase extraction SPE, solid phase microextraction SPME, stir bar sorptive extraction SBSE). In addition, volatile compounds can be extracted by methods based on combinations of some of these properties (headspace solid phase microextraction HS-SPME, solid phase dynamic extraction SPDE). 

However, a previous distillation is sometimes needed to separate the target compounds from a complex matrix sample. After they are condensed, they can then be either injected directly or through the HS mode. In other cases, the use of extraction techniques like solvent-solvent extraction, solid-phase extraction, and solid-phase microextraction not only achieves the isolation of the target compounds from the matrix but also produces a preconcentration of... 

Analytical technique used to analyze brine sample. P T = purge-and-trap SPE = solid-phase extraction SPME = solid-phase microextraction Z refers to previously published results (6) based on purge-and-trap GC/MS (HP-5 capillary column). 

Today, sample preparation is maybe the step that most influences the accuracy of the whole analytic method, with the extraction of pesticide residues from environmental matrices the key factor for achieving it. There is no question that in the first decade of the century, SPE technique [72] is the most employed alternative to the classical solid-liquid [13] and liquid-liquid [14] extractions. These classical techniques present multiple disadvantages such as the low recovery of polar pesticides and transformation products (in the case of liquid-liquid extractions) and use of large volumes of solvents. Furthermore, several variants emerged based on the SPE technique solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [72-74], in-tube solid-phase microextraction [72,75,76], matrix solid-phase dispersion [72,77,78], and stir-bar sorptive extraction [72,79]. 

Shen, S. et al.. Comparison of solid-phase microextraction, supercritical fluid extraction, steam distillation, and solvent extraction techniques for analysis of volatile consituents in Fructus amomi, J. AOAC Int., 88, 418, 2005. 

The most widely employed techniques for the extraction of water samples for triazine compounds include liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), solid-phase extraction (SPE), and liquid-solid extraction (LSE). Although most reports involving SPE are off-line procedures, there is increasing interest and subsequently increasing numbers of reports regarding on-line SPE, the goal of which is to improve overall productivity and safety. To a lesser extent, solid-phase microextraction (SPME), supercritical fluid extraction (SEE), semi-permeable membrane device (SPMD), and molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) techniques have been reported. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) consists of dipping a fiber into an aqueous sample to adsorb the analytes followed by thermal desorption into the carrier stream for GC, or, if the analytes are thermally labile, they can be desorbed into the mobile phase for LC. Examples of commercially available fibers include 100-qm PDMS, 65-qm Carbowax-divinylbenzene (CW-DVB), 75-qm Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CX-PDMS), and 85-qm polyacrylate, the last being more suitable for the determination of triazines. The LCDs can be as low as 0.1 qgL Since the quantity of analyte adsorbed on the fiber is based on equilibrium rather than extraction, procedural recovery cannot be assessed on the basis of percentage extraction. The robustness and sensitivity of the technique were demonstrated in an inter-laboratory validation study for several parent triazines and DEA and DIA. A 65-qm CW-DVB fiber was employed for analyte adsorption followed by desorption into the injection port (split/splitless) of a gas chromatograph. The sample was adjusted to neutral pH, and sodium chloride was added to obtain a concentration of 0.3 g During continuous... 

The need to understand the fate of pesticides in the environment has necessitated the development of analytical methods for the determination of residues in environmental media. Adoption of methods utilizing instrumentation such as gas chro-matography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has allowed the detection of minute amounts of pesticides and their degradation products in environmental samples. Sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have also been important in the development of more reliable and sensitive analytical methods. 

During the last few years, miniaturization has become a dominant trend in the analysis of low-level contaminants in food and environmental samples. This has resulted in a significant reduction in the volume of hazardous and expensive solvents. Typical examples of miniaturization in sample preparation techniques are micro liquid/liquid extractions (in-vial) and solvent-free techniques such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME). Combined with state-of-the-art analytical instrumentation, this trend has resulted in faster analyses, higher sample throughputs and lower solvent consumption, whilst maintaining or even increasing assay sensitivity. 

Solid-phase microextraction eliminates many of the drawbacks of other sample preparation techniques, such as headspace, purge and trap, LLE, SPE, or simultaneous distillation/extraction techniques, including excessive preparation time or extravagant use of high-purity organic solvents. SPME ranks amongst other solvent-free sample preparation methods, notably SBSE (Section 3.5.3) and PT (Section 4.2.2) which essentially operate at room temperature, and DHS (Section 4.2.2),... 

Miniaturisation of scientific instruments, following on from size reduction of electronic devices, has recently been hyped up in analytical chemistry (Tables 10.19 and 10.20). Typical examples of miniaturisation in sample preparation techniques are micro liquid-liquid extraction (in-vial extraction), ambient static headspace and disc cartridge SPE, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE). A main driving force for miniaturisation is the possibility to use MS detection. Also, standard laboratory instrumentation such as GC, HPLC [88] and MS is being miniaturised. Miniaturisation of the LC system is compulsory, because the pressure to decrease solvent usage continues. Quite obviously, compact detectors, such as ECD, LIF, UV (and preferably also MS), are welcome. 

Headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME). With this extraction technique, it is possible to concentrate volatile compounds thus allowing their detection even at trace levels, as in the case of volatile and semi-volatile terpenes in archaeological findings [7,31]. Chapter 10 outlines how resinous materials are investigated using HS-SPME-GC/MS. 

Abstract A relatively small number of mammalian pheromones has been identified, in contrast to a plethora of known insect pheromones, but two remarkable Asian elephant/insect pheromonal linkages have been elucidated, namely, (Z)-7-dodecen-1-yl acetate and frontalin. In addition, behavioral bioassays have demonstrated the presence of a chemical signal in the urine of female African elephants around the time of ovulation. Our search for possible ovulatory pheromones in the headspace over female African elephant urine has revealed for the first time the presence of a number of known insect pheromones. This search has been facilitated by the use of a powerful new analytical technique, automated solid phase dynamic extraction (SPDE)/GC-MS, as well as by novel macros for enhanced and rapid comparison of multiple mass spectral data files from Agilent ChemStation . This chapter will focus on our methodologies and results, as well as on a comparison of SPDE and the more established techniques of solid phase microextraction (SPME) and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE). 

In the 1990s, Pawliszyn [3] developed a rapid, simple, and solvent-free extraction technique termed solid-phase microextraction. In this technique, a fused-silica fiber is coated with a polymer that allows for fast mass transfer—both in the adsorption and desorption of analytes. SPME coupled with GC/MS has been used to detect explosive residues in seawater and sediments from Hawaii [33]. Various fibers coated with carbowax/divinylbenzene, polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene, and polyacrylate are used. The SPME devices are simply immersed into the water samples. The sediment samples are first sonicated with acetonitrile, evaporated, and reconstituted in water, and then sampled by SPME. The device is then inserted into the injection port of the GC/MS system and the analytes thermally desorbed from the fiber. Various... 

In the past two decades quite a few new techniques have emerged for the treatment of aqueous samples prior to organic analysis. Perhaps the most important development is that of solid-phase extraction (SPE), which has successfully replaced many off-line steps. This technique can be considered to have introduced a genuine new era in sample handling [1]. The many varieties in which the technique is available and can be applied have made it the key step in handling of aqueous samples. Among the successful varieties are solid-phase microextraction (SPME), matrix solid-phase dispersion, disk extraction and immunosorbent extraction. Several reviews covering these topics have appeared in the literature in the past decade (see e.g. Refs. [2,3] for nonylphenol... 

The mass of sample taken for analysis is primarily dependent on four factors (1) the amount of material available, (2) the concentration of the analyte, (3) the heterogeneity of the sample, and (4) the method of analysis. Most conventional solvent extraction techniques currently start with more sample than is required, use more extraction solvent than is necessary, and ultimately only analyze 0.1% of the material prepared, e.g., 1 pi from 1 ml. Micro-extraction techniques [468] can be used in conjunction with on-line LC-GC or LC-MS to utilize the whole extract in the final determinations. This approach can significantly reduce the size of sample required and the volume of solvent used. Many workers have reported the use of solid phase microextraction (SPME) in different environmental matrices for various pollutants [288,342,345,469 - 477]. 

In 2003, Smith reviewed newer sample preparation techniques, including pressurized liquid extraction, solid phase microextractions, membrane extraction, and headspace analysis. Most of these techniques aim to reduce the amount of sample and solvent required for efficient extraction. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is effectively a miniamrised version of SPE. Instead of using a packed cartridge, a rod is typically used, which is coated with the stationary phase. This is dipped into a solution of the analyte and allowed to extract for a pre-determined period of time. After this incubation period, the rod is removed from the solution and may be inserted directly into the injection system of the GC or HPLC. All of these operations can be automated on an autosampler. Clearly, the success of this technique depends intimately on the affinity of the analyte for the stationary phase. Frost, Hussain and Raghani [34] used SPME with GC-FID to measure benzyl chloride and chloroethylmethyl ether (amongst other process impurities) in pharmaceutical preparations. 

In this work, we adapted a method for the analysis of beer aldehydes using solid-phase microextraction (SPMF) with on-fiber derivatization. This extraction technique does not require solvents, consists of a one-step sample preparation procedure, and provides high sensitivity and reproducibility. It enabled a detailed study of aldehyde level changes during packaged beer storage. 

---