Solid-phase microextraction analyte concentrations

The most sensitive method for CVAA has recently been reported by Wooten et al. (39) using solid-phase microextraction to concentrate the derivatized analyte. Urine, with added ammonium acetate buffer and PhAsO as an internal standard, was derivatized directly with 1,3-propanedithiol and the derivative concentrated on a poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber. Analysis was by automated GC/MS using SIM of the isotopic MH+ ions. An impressive detection limit of 7.4pg/ml was reported, using a benchtop GC/MS system. The method was validated using spiked human urine. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) consists of dipping a fiber into an aqueous sample to adsorb the analytes followed by thermal desorption into the carrier stream for GC, or, if the analytes are thermally labile, they can be desorbed into the mobile phase for LC. Examples of commercially available fibers include 100-qm PDMS, 65-qm Carbowax-divinylbenzene (CW-DVB), 75-qm Carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CX-PDMS), and 85-qm polyacrylate, the last being more suitable for the determination of triazines. The LCDs can be as low as 0.1 qgL Since the quantity of analyte adsorbed on the fiber is based on equilibrium rather than extraction, procedural recovery cannot be assessed on the basis of percentage extraction. The robustness and sensitivity of the technique were demonstrated in an inter-laboratory validation study for several parent triazines and DEA and DIA. A 65-qm CW-DVB fiber was employed for analyte adsorption followed by desorption into the injection port (split/splitless) of a gas chromatograph. The sample was adjusted to neutral pH, and sodium chloride was added to obtain a concentration of 0.3 g During continuous... 

Principles and Characteristics Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a patented microscale adsorp-tion/desorption technique developed by Pawliszyn et al. [525-531], which represents a recent development in sample preparation and sample concentration. In SPME analytes partition from a sample into a polymeric stationary phase that is thin-coated on a fused-silica rod (typically 1 cm x 100 p,m). Several configurations of SPME have been proposed including fibre, tubing, stirrer/fan, etc. SPME was introduced as a solvent-free sample preparation technique for GC. 

Nitrobenzene, 2,4-dinitrotoluene and 2,6-dinitrotoluene were determined in water by GC-EC or GC-CLD thermal energy analyzer (TEA) and by EI-MS, CI-MS and NICI-MS455, after solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with polydimethylsiloxane coated fiber. SPME is a technique to concentrate organic compounds dissolved in an aqueous matrix by adsorption on a solid stationary phase immobilized on a fused silica fiber. The analytes were thermally desorbed directly into the GC injector LOD was 9 pg/L for nitrobenzene and 15 pg/L for the dinitrotoluenes456. 

The mass of sample taken for analysis is primarily dependent on four factors (1) the amount of material available, (2) the concentration of the analyte, (3) the heterogeneity of the sample, and (4) the method of analysis. Most conventional solvent extraction techniques currently start with more sample than is required, use more extraction solvent than is necessary, and ultimately only analyze 0.1% of the material prepared, e.g., 1 pi from 1 ml. Micro-extraction techniques [468] can be used in conjunction with on-line LC-GC or LC-MS to utilize the whole extract in the final determinations. This approach can significantly reduce the size of sample required and the volume of solvent used. Many workers have reported the use of solid phase microextraction (SPME) in different environmental matrices for various pollutants [288,342,345,469 - 477]. 

Excerpt 4C is taken from an article in Analytical Chemistry. Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HSSPME) is coupled with GC to quantify polychlorinated biphenyls (RGBs) in milk. The RGBs are volatilized out of the liquid phase (milk) into the gas phase (headspace) and concentrated on an SPME fiber. The concentrated RGBs on the fiber are then injected into the GG. 

HSSPIVIE Headspace solid-phase microextraction a preconcentration technique that concentrates volatile analytes on a fiber than can be inserted directly into a GC... 

Arthur and Pawliszyn introduced solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in 1990 as a solvent-free sampling technique that reduces the steps of extraction, cleanup, and concentration to a unique step. SPME utilizes a small segment of fused-silica fiber coated with a polymeric phase to extract the analytes from the sample and to introduce them into a chromatographic system. Initially, SPME was used to analyze pollutants in water - via direct extraction. Subsequently, SPME was applied to more complex matrixes, such as solid samples or biological fluids. With these types of samples, direct SPME is not recommended nevertheless, the headspace mode (HSSPME) is an effective alternative to extracting volatile and semivolatile compounds from complex matrixes. (Adapted from Llompart et ah, 2001)... 

In another study, Darrach et al. [2] reported that samples collected near intact UUXO targets contained traces of explosives at up to parts per billion (ppb) concentration levels. The samples were analyzed in the laboratory, using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) to extract target analytes from the samples. The samples were then processed using a reversal electron attachment detection (READ) technique. If the levels of contamination found in these studies are representative of that emanating from most UUXO, the implication is that sensitive chemical sensors such as the SeaDog may be useful for detecting UUXO. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME). used as a sample introduction technique for high speed gc, utilizes small-diameter fused-silica fibers coated with polymeric stationary phase for sample extraction and concentration. SPME lias been utilized for determination of pollutants in aqueous solution by the adsorption of analyte onto stationary-phase coated fuscd-silica fibers, followed by thermal desorption in the injection system of a capillary gas chromatograph. Full automation can be achieved using an autosampler. 

Figure 11.19 SPME-CE analysis of urine samples (a) blank urine (a) directly injected and extracted for (b) 5 (c) 10 and (d) 30 min (b) Urine spiked with barbiturates, extracted for (e) 30 and (f, g) 5 min. Peak identification is as follows 1, pentobartibal 2, butabarbital 3, secobarbital 4, amobarbital 5, aprobarbital 6, mephobarbital 7, butalbital 8, thiopental. Concentrations used are 0.15-1.0 ppm (e, f) and 0.05-0.3 ppm (g). Reprinted from Analytical Chemistry, 69, S. Li and S. G. Weber, Determination of barbiturates by solid-phase microextraction and capillary electrophoresis, pp. 1217-1222, copyright 1997, with permission from the American Chemical Society.

Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), an approach theoretically similar to SPME, was recently introduced [141] for the trace enrichment of organic compounds from aqueous food, biological, and environmental samples. A stir bar is coated with a sorbent and immersed in the sample to extract the analyte from solution. To date, reported SBSE procedures were not usually operated as exhaustive extraction procedures however, SBSE has a greater capacity for quantitative extraction than SPME. The sample is typically stirred with the coated stir bar for a specified time, usually for less than 60 minutes, depending on the sample volume and the stirring speed, to approach equilibrium. SBSE improves on the low concentration capability of in-sample solid-phase microextraction (IS-SPME). 

Maurer has reviewed the application of LC-MS and LC-MS/MS to the detection of alkaloids in human biofluids [14]. Extraction techniques include liquid-liquid extraction relying upon the ionization of alkaloids in aqueous acid, solid phase extraction (SPE) in which alkaloids are cleaned up and concentrated from the biomatrix by adsorption and subsequent elution from a small cartridge of solid phase adsorbent, and solid-phase microextraction (SPME), in which analytes are adsorbed directly from the matrix or the headspace above the heated matrix onto a fine fiber of adsorbent on fused silica. The latter process is more commonly used with GC-M S but is finding increasing use with LC-MS. 

A solid-phase microextraction process involves two steps, namely partitioning of the analytes between the coating and the sample, and desorption of the concentrated species into an analytical instrument. In the first step, the coated fibre is exposed and the target analytes are extracted from the sample matrix into the coating. In the second step, the fibre with the concentrated analytes is transferred to an instrument for desorption. A third, clean-up step can also be incorporated by using selective solvents, as in SPE. 

Analytical Methods for Urine and Blood. Specific biomarkers of lewisite exposure are currently based on a very limited number of in vitro experiments (Jakubowski et al., 1993 Wooten et al., 2002) and animal studies (Logan et al., 1999 Fidder et al., 2000). Wooten et al. (2002) developed a solid-phase microextraction (SPME) headspace sampling method for urine samples followed by GC-MS analysis. It is the most sensitive method reported to date with a lower limit of detection of 7.4 pg/mL. Animal experiments have been limited in number and in their scope. In one study of four animals, guinea pigs were given a subcutaneous dose of lewisite (0.5 mg/kg). Urine samples were analyzed for CVAA using both GC-MS and GC coupled with an atomic emission spectrometer set for elemental arsenic (Logan et al., 1999). The excretion profile indicated a very rapid elimination of CVAA in the urine. The mean concentrations detected were 3.5 pg/mL, 250 ng/mL, and 50 ng/mL for the 0-8, 8-16, and 16-24 h samples, respectively. Trace level concentrations... 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is the process whereby an analyte is adsorbed onto the surface of a coated-sihca fibre as a method of concentration. This is followed by desorption of the analytes into a suitable instrument for separation and quantitation. The theory of SPME is discussed in Box 8.1. 

Quantification of aroma-impact components by isotope dilution assays (IDA) was introduced in food flavor research by Schieberle and Grosch (1987), when trying to take into account losses of analytes due to isolation procedures. The labeled compounds have to be synthesized, the suitable fragments have to be chosen, and calibration has to be effected. A quantitative determination of ppb levels of 3-damascenone (Section 5,D.38) in foods, particularly in roasted coffee (powder and brew), was developed by Sen et al. (1991a). Semmelroch et al. (1995) quantified the potent odorants in roasted coffee by IDA. Hawthorne et al. (1992) directly determined caffeine concentration in coffee beverages with reproducibility of about 5 % using solid-phase microextraction combined with IDA. Blank et al. (1999) applied this combined method to potent coffee odorants and found it to be a rapid and accurate quantification method. They also concluded that the efficiency of IDA could be improved by optimizing the MS conditions. 

An automated in-tube solid-phase microextraction HPLC method for NNK and several metabolites have been developed by Mullett et al. ° In-tube SPME is an on-line extraction technique where analytes are extracted and concentrated from the sample directly into a coated capillary by repeated draw-eject steps. A tailor-made polypyrrole-coated capillary was used to evaluate their extraction efficiencies for NNK and several metabolites in cell cultures. This automated extraction and analysis method simplified the determination of the tobacco-specific A-nitrosamines, requiring a total sample analysis time of only 30 min. 

---