Management measurements

Deakin, E Skabardonis, A and May, A. (1986). Traffic Signal Timing as a Transportation System Management Measure The California Experience. Transportation Research Record 1081. Transportation Research Board. Washiiigto, DC National Research Council. 

A statement indicating whether or not the device is manufactured utilising tissues of animal origin as referred to in Directive 2003/32/EC and the risk management measures in this connection which have been applied to reduce the risk of infection... 

Article 3(37) of REACH defines exposure scenarios as the set of conditions, including operational conditions and risk management measures, that describe how the substance is manufactured or used during its life-cycle and how the manufacturer or importer controls, or recommends downstream users to control, exposures of humans and the environment [...] . 

The instrumentation of REACH is differentiated and targeted to this complex regulatory field. And the waste phase, as shown, is explicitly subject to exposure scenario building, which in turn is the basis for substance evaluation and the resulting management measures to be derived. 

China, in addition to ratifying the Basel Convention, has a 2002 law banning hazardous waste imports. In 2005, the Management Measure for the Prevention of Pollution from Electronic Products became effective. It has been referred to as China s RoHS, specifying limits on materials similar to the EU Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive. A new waste disposal law enacted in 2009, Regulations for the Administration of the Recovery and Disposal of Electric and... 

There is a risk in using circular reasoning when introducing a new overall quality concept (such as the IQC) that contains new aspects and new parameters. It is difficult to introduce an unknown aspect such as integration, to associate it with crop management measures and to measure it with experimental parameters such as luminescence and biocrystallisations. A methodological... 

The integration aspect and associated management measures need to be translated in plant physiological terms by experiments with some physiologically well-documented crops. 

Within cattle breeds, there is genetic variation in terms of resistance to GIN infection and the heritability is great enough to enable successful selection for GIN resistance (Gasbarre and Miller, 2000). Since anthelmintic resistance is not a major issue in bovine GIN and grazing management measures are effective in reducing GIN infections in cattle, the establishment of a selection... 

The risk asses sment may include an evaluation of what the risks mean in practice to those effected. This will depend heavily on how the risk is perceived. Risk perception involves peoples beliefs, attitudes, judgements and feelings, as well as the wider social or cultural values that people adopt towards hazards and their benefits. The way in which people perceive risk is vital in the process of assessing and managing risk. Risk perception will be a major determinant in whether a risk is deemed to be acceptable and whether the risk management measures imposed are seen to resolve the problem. 

Risk management measures can be separated into genuine risk management measures and ingenuine, auxiliary, risk management measures. While only the former should be considered seriously, the latter is reviewed briefly lest a responsible marketer or public policy official finds himself or herself leaning in ill-advised directions. 

As alluded to in the BSE illustration given earlier, genuine risk management measures can focus on systematic hazard removal based on the HACCP system or on some other alternative or more appropriate system. In some cases, this can involve the isolation of the cause of the problem. In other cases, it can involve the conservative elimination of all suspected contaminants. Concurrent with this is the importance of reporting these efforts in a proactive means and keeping consumers informed about decisions, processes, and progress. 

XRF is widely used in industrial applications where a large number of elements need to be determined quantitatively. It is used for continuous quality control in the steel industry (e.g., the determination of Mn, Cr, Ni, Co, etc., in the production of stainless steels), and also for casting quality of coins in the Royal Mint (where Cu, Ni, and Zn are continuously monitored). Geological applications include whole rock analyses and clay identification. The power industry uses it as pollution control management, measuring sulfur and heavy metal concentrations in fuels (coal, oil) and ash. 

Companies will be required to provide information on the identity and properties of a compound (including physical, chemical, toxicological, and ecotoxicological properties), the intended uses, the estimated human and environmental exposure, risks for humans and the environment, and proposals for risk management measures. Information requirements will depend largely on production volumes, but might be adjusted based on the intrinsic properties and conditions of use of individual substances. 

The harmonised EU safety data sheet is designed to describe systematically the hazardous properties of chemicals and to inform users about suitable and effective risk management measures. For some years this safety data sheet also has to state what (eco)toxicological standard effects have not been verified for a specific substance. The EU instrument has now been in existence for thirteen years, while the corresponding DIN predecessor had already been introduced in the 1980s. Nevertheless, many safety data sheets still indicate extensive quality shortcomings. 

The attempt to carry out risk assessment on a scientific basis has resulted in the systematic separation of risk assessment and practical risk management. An undesirable effect of this strict separation is the fact that the present practice of risk assessment does not produce the information that is required for formulation of risk management measures in a goal-oriented way. 

Certain quality management measures already outlined, and summarised in Table 7.3, wiU reduce the opportunities for fraud. 

The first action is to gather existing available test data on the substance, including the conduct of a literature search. Additionally, usage and exposure data and risk management measures should be obtained. From this, the need for further information can be determined. 

Studies are not needed if the substance is a known genotoxic carcinogen and/or a germ cell mutagen and appropriate risk management measures are implemented. Also, the studies are not needed if the substance has no evidence of toxicity, there is no systemic absorption (from toxicokinetic data) and there is no significant human exposure. 

U.S. EPA (2000). National Management Measures to Control Non-Point Pollution from Agriculture. Office of Water, Non-Point Source Control Branch, Draft Report. 

All available and relevant information on substances on their own, in preparations and in articles should be collected to assist in identifying hazardous properties, and recommendations about risk management measures should systematically be conveyed through supply chains, as reasonably necessary, to prevent adverse effects on human health and the environment. In addition, communication of technical advice to support risk management should be encouraged in the supply chain, where appropriate."... 

---