Disease management preventative measures

Key words integrated pest management (IPM) strategy, disease management, preventative measures, removal of infectious agents, biocontrol. 

The magnitude of the problem of cancer and the failure of conventional strategies to effect a marked diminution in the total number of deaths from this disease indicate that other preventive measures must be seriously considered. There are many possible strategies to reduce cancer-related deaths (1) prevention, (2) early diagnosis and intervention, (3) successful treatment of localized cancer, and (4) improved management of nonlocalized cancer. Among these, prevention appears to be the most practical approach for dealing with the cancer problem. 

An understanding of the modes of transmission of these diseases and clinical signs observed in affected animals will help facility managers establish preventive measures to protect individuals who come into contact with the animals or their tissues. 

Prevention is in the first line of disease management, and the development and implementation of biosecurity strategies for fish diseases is exercised at national level and is embodied in the codes of practice of several international organisations such as the EU 2006 Directive and the OIE code of practice. Oidtmann et al. (2011) provide an overview of international and national biosecurity strategies in aquatic animal health. Preventative measures on the whole require more risk analysis and closer adherence than they currently enjoy so that they may become a higher priority. Unfortunately, the preventative measures most closely adhered to tend to be largely those most closely regulated. Some of these preventative measures as out-fined below are subjected to intensive research and are dealt with elsewhere in this book. 

This team must be skilled in handling the complex origin of disability. Risk factors for the disease to become chronic are often of a psychosocial and not a physical nature. Primary targets of treatment should be physical fitness and the self-management of problems by the patient. Awareness of the psychosocial factors, which can disturb occupational reintegration, should be developed. Rehabilitation is based on measures to modify patient s beliefs and fitness. The prescribed treatment should aim to relieve pain, correct disability, prevent relapses, inform and educate the patient. 

On November 18-20, 1998, a workshop on Scientific Issues Relevant to the Assessment of Health Effects from Exposure to Methylmercury was conducted in Raleigh, North Carolina. The workshop was jointly sponsored by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and ATSDR. The purpose of this workshop was to discuss and evaluate the major epidemiologic studies that associated methylmercury exposure and the results of an array of developmental measures in children. These studies monitored and evaluated exposed populations in Iraq, the Seychelles Islands, the Faroe Islands, and the Amazon River Basin. A number of animal studies were also considered in support of a human health risk assessment. 

The reduction of the amount of wet work is the most important measure in prevention of occupational skin diseases, not only because wet work itself is irritant, but because many relevant allergens contact the skin during wet work. Furthermore, the concept of wet work is easily understood, and it is often not difficult to convince the management to reduce wet work by showing its effects on the frequency of hand eczema... 

---