Evaluation of System Risk

The information provided above on this proposed system reveals many serious or potentially serious hazard risk levels. When asking the basic questions associated with the identification of system risk, the analyst can begin to categorize the severity of a potential mishap and evaluate the probability of a possible occurrence (refer Tables 2.1 and 2.2). The following is an itemized listing of a few of the initial safety concerns which should be resolved prior to proceeding into the design phase of this project s life cycle. The identification of these potential hazard risks is the result of proper utilization of the basic system safety tools discussed thus far. 

Hazard Risk Item 1 Personnel under suspended loads 

The proposed design will require that the crane/load combination be moved directly over the operator s console. OSHA requires that crane operators avoid transporting loads over personnel [OSHA 29 CFR 1910.179(n) (3)(vi)]. 

Because the severity of such an occurrence is categorized as critical (i.e., severe injury, occupational illness, or system damage) and, due to the proposed system design, the probability of a mishap of this nature is categorized as frequent (i.e., likely to occur frequently), the risk assessment matrix 

GENERIC HAZARD EVALUATION CHECKLIST SYSTEM/PROGRAM Vapor Degreaser PERFORMED BY J-Doe DATE 05/2013  

---

In an effort to demonstrate the utDity of the preliminary hazard list and the preliminary hazard analysis in the initial evaluation of system risk, an example of a simple vapor degreaser in a manufacturing facility will be examined. This illustration will utilize the PHL in the development of the PHA in the method discussed earlier in this chapter. However, it must be noted from the outset that this example is intended... 

In the failure mode and effects described above, one failure mode has been assessed as critical. The analyst should now provide either acceptance or rejection rational so that management can evaluate all aspects of this failure mode and effect before making a decision. Remember that one of the primary underlying purposes of the system safety effort is to provide management with choices in their evaluation of system risk. 

Erdmann, R. C. et al., 1976, ATWS A Reappraisal Part If Evaluation of Societal Risks Due to Reactor Protection System Failure Vol IIBWR Risk Analysis EPRINP-265,. ugust. 

Kdly, J. E. et al 1976, ATWS, A Reappraisal Part II, Evaluation of Societal Risks due to Reactor Protection System Failure Vol.3 PWR Risk Analysis, EPRINP 265, August. 

Risk is defined as the probability of an undesirable event occurring and the impact of that event if it does occur. The result of this analysis will influence the degree to which the system development, implementation, and maintenance activities are performed and documented. By evaluating the system risk analysis, the system owner may uncover potential problems, which can be avoided during the development process. The chances of a successful, if not perfect, system implementation are improved. 

Classification of a given waste is based on an evaluation of the risk index specified in Equations 6.4, 6.5 and 6.6 for assumed types of disposal systems. If the risk index is less than unity, the waste is acceptable for inclusion in the associated waste class otherwise, the waste generally requires a more protective disposal system and would be placed in a class for more hazardous wastes. The appropriate classification depends on the level of protection required which, in turn, depends on the characteristics of the waste relative to the capabilities of assumed disposal technologies. This concept is a fundamental part of the risk index. General assumptions about... 

Site-specific assessments of the in situ risks of sediment pollution in The Netherlands are carried out mainly in freshwater systems. The in situ BEBA is then part of a broader evaluation of the risks caused by sediment pollution, aimed at the question of whether the risks make sediment remediation necessary. For this evaluation, a tiered approach is followed ... 

Full evaluation of qualified risk management options should be based on selection criteria that have been thoroughly checked, expanded if needed and agreed with the site stakeholders. To allow an overall evaluation, it is advisable to set out a system for scoring and weighting the conclusions for individual and unrelated criteria. Formal cost-benefit appraisal may be required to either separate close contenders or to support initial conclusions. 

The owner of the IT system is responsible for the investigation and evaluation of risks that emerge from the GxP operational process. Application man-agers/system operators are responsible for the investigation and evaluation of the risks that emerge from the IT technical realization. 

The evaluation of clinical risk requires the careful application of judgement based on a sound knowledge of the system under consideration and the domain in which it is deployed. Similarly, the effective formulation and implementation of an SMS is a complex task which requires skill and expertise. It follows therefore that the accuracy of a CRM analysis is significantly dependent on the competency of the stakeholders involved. Those challenging the claims of a safety case might be quite justified in bringing into question its validity where the capabihties and proficiency of its authors is questionable. It is therefore wise for a rigorous CRM system to be backed up by pro-active evidence of a personnel competency assessment for project stakeholders. 

An underlying assumption of all accident models is that there are common patterns in accidents and that they are not simply random events. Accident models impose patterns on accidents and influence the factors considered in any safety analysis. Because the accident model influences what cause(s) is ascribed to an accident, the countermeasures taken to prevent future accidents, and the evaluation of the risk in operating a system, the power and features of the accident model used will greatly affect our ability to identify and control hazards and thus prevent accidents. 

Measurement of the amount of solvent coming into contact with the skin is much more difficult than for the inhalation route and in consequence quantitative criteria are not generally available. Criteria for control of risk by this route are thus based on recognition and evaluation of the risk (either of local effects on the skin/ eyes or of systemic toxicity caused by skin absorption) and control of the risk by taking practical steps to ensure that exposure is adequately low. These measures will include ... 

Evaluations of the risk of fatal impacts on environmental systems have to take into account that the effects may often be caused by impurities and not by the declared chemical. 

Integral part of the risk analysis of a critical system is identification and assessment of hazards that significantly contribute to risk (Rausand Hoyland 2004). The hazard analysis generates data required in the next stage of analysis, which lead to description of risk scenarios, definition of safety functions, evaluation of actual risk levels and required risk reduction. Then the technical specification of safety-related functions to be realized by the system architectures considered to select most justified one. 

In the paper the multi-state approach to the analysis and evaluation of systems reliability risk and availability has been practically applied. The pipeline transportation system has been considered in varying in time operation conditions. The system reliability structure and its components reliability functions were changing in variable operation conditions. The paper proposed an approach to the solution of practically very important problem of linking the systems reliability and their operation processes. To involve the interactions between the systems operation processes and their varying in time reliability structures... 

Kolowrocki, K., Soszynska, J., Baranowski, Z. Golik, P. 2008. Preliminary modeling, statistical identification and evaluation of reliability, risk, availability and safety of port, shipyard and ship technical systems in constant and variable operation conditions. WP4 - Task 4.2. Preliminary reliability, risk and availability analysis and evaluation of a port oil transportation system in constant and variable operation conditions. WP4- Sub-Task 4.2.1 -English - 30.11.2008. Poland-Singapore Joint Project. MSHE Decision No. 63/N-Singapore/2007/0. 

The information provided above on this proposed system reveals many serious or potentially serious hazard risk levels. When asking the basic questions associated with the identification of system risk, the analyst can begin to categorize the severity of a potential mishap, and evaluate the probability of a possible occurrence... 

A logical evaluation of acceptability of system risks —Recommendations as to system risk control... 

The text of Appendix F, Part A, on the IARC Monographs, is paraphrased from the 2006 Preamble to the Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans the Classifier is referred to the full IARC Preamble for the complete text. The text is not part of the agreed GHS text on the harmonized system developed by the OECD Task Force-HCL. 

The end product is put into operation during this phase. Whether the end product is a facility, a piece of operating equipment, a tool, or a service, the entire effort of the system safety process will be realized during and throughout the operations phase. If the end user is an internal organization, the system safety professional has an opportunity to closely observe product operation and to make subsequent evaluation of the risks associated with that operation. However, if the end user is an external agency, there is seldom an opportunity to conduct operational evaluations of risk. Either way, the proof is in the pudding and the system safety efforts prior to the operational phase should therefore be as complete as possible. 

Qualitative Risk Assessment An examination of system risk based upon established criteria that allow the analyst to evaluate risk levels in relation to other risks or total system risk. 

---