Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Occupational illnesses

Injury and occupational illness severity. Those jobs that have involved serious incidents. There may be a basic problem in the work environment or in the job performance itself... [Pg.44]

Thus, there is a clear need to establish the relationship between the health effects of hazardous chemical agents in the environment and the level of occupational exposure to the body by means of an occupational exposure limit, in which a reference figure for the concentration of a chemical agent is set. In fact, occupational exposure limits (OELs) have been a feature of the industrialized world since the early 1950s. They were introduced, primarily in the United States, at a time when measures to prevent occupational diseases were considered more beneficial than compensating victims, and in this sense OELs have played an important part in the control of occupational illnesses. [Pg.363]

BEIs apply to 8 hr exposures, five days a week. However, BEIs for altered working schedules can be extrapolated on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic bases. BEIs should not be applied, either directly or through a conversion factor, to the determination of safe levels for non-occupational exposure to air and water pollutants, or food contaminants. The BEIs are not intended for use as a measure of adverse effects or for diagnosis of occupational illness. [Pg.77]

Occupational illness Any abnormal condition or disorder, other than one resulting from an occupational injury, caused by exposure to environmental factors associated with employment. It includes acute and chronic illnesses or diseases that may be caused by inhalation, absorption, ingestion, or direct contact. [Pg.6]

Recordable cases Cases involving an occupational injury or occupational illness, including deaths. [Pg.6]

Recordable nonfatal cases without lost workdays Cases of occupational injury or illness that do not involve fatalities or lost workdays but do result in (1) transfer to another job or termination of employment or (2) medical treatment other than first aid or (3) diagnosis of occupational illness or (4) loss of consciousness or (5) restriction of work or motion. [Pg.6]

Skin diseases are the second most common form of occupational disease with contact dermatitis accounting for 10 to 15% of all occupational illnesses with an annual associated cost of at least 1 billion [7], Although irritant dermatitis accounts for the majority of cases of contact dermatitis, studies have reported that contact allergies are relevant in between 20 to 50% of contact dermatitis cases [8], In 2003 there were 49 cases of occupational skin disease reported for every 100,000 workers in private... [Pg.545]

More information is available on the public health impact of occupational contact dermatitis. Specific national occupational disease and illness data are available from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), which conducts annual surveys of approximately 180,000 employers selected to represent all private industries in the United States.68 All occupational skin diseases or disorders, including allergic contact dermatitis, are tabulated in this survey. BLS data show that occupational skin diseases accounted for a consistent 30 to 45% of all cases of occupational illnesses from the 1970s through the mid-1980s, and in recent years accounted for 15% of all occupational illness.68 The decline in this proportion may be partially related to an increase seen in disorders associated with repeated trauma. [Pg.567]

Leigh, J.P., Yasmeen, S., and Miller, T.R., Medical costs of fourteen occupational illnesses in the United States in 1999, Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 29, 304, 2003. [Pg.589]

Category II - Critical. May cause severe injury, severe occupational illness, or major system damage. [Pg.46]

Category III - Marginal. May cause minor injury, minor occupational illness, or minor system damage. [Pg.46]

Category IV - Negligible. Will not result in injury, occupational illness, or system damage. [Pg.46]

Most, if not all, occupational illnesses associated with 2,4,5-T (such as chloracne) have been found to be the result of product contamination with TCDD. TCDD is extremely toxic to animals, and exposure has also been associated with liver function impairment, peripheral neuropathy, personality changes, porphyria cutanea, hypertrichosis, and hyperpigmentation in humans. TCDD is a chlorinated dioxin, one of a large number of related compounds referred to as dioxins it has no functional use and is not intentionally produced. It has been identified as the responsible toxic agent in several industrial disasters, such as accidental releases at Nitro, WV in 1949, and at Seveso, Italy in 1976. " The role of dioxin contaminants must also be considered in the discussion of 2,4,5-T toxicology. [Pg.701]

It is difficult to obtain figures that accurately reflect the incidence of pesticide poisoning, and the number of documented cases of direct human poisoning in the USA varies from source to source. It was estimated that there are 100,000 nonfatal cases of human poisoning each year from pesticide exposure (7). In 1973 there were 1,A7A cases of occupational illness associated with pesticide exposure in California (8). Organophosphate insecticides are a major cause of occupational poisoning. [Pg.8]

The Mil by report listed 18 reentry cases from 1949 to 1971 in California citrus (2). Gunther and coworkers cited 47 reentry incidents from 1949 to 1976 in California citrus (3). Peoples et al. reported 38 cases of occupational illness in California Hue to aldicarb exposure from 1974 to 1976 (4). Approximately 14 of these cases were due to exposure to aldicarb residues. [Pg.59]

Peoples et al. (5) reported that 351 cases of occupational illness caused By parathion exposure were seen by California physicians in 1975. Seventeen of these cases can be regarded as worker reentry incidents. Knaak et aj. (6) reported a case of 118 worker illnesses from dialifor exposure in a California grape vineyard in 1976. Davies et al. ( 7) reported 2 cases (24 fieldworkers) involving parathion in Florida sweet corn. In 1975, one death was reported from North Carolina workers reentering a parathion-treated tobacco field 8). [Pg.59]

Threshold limit values (TLVs) refer to airborne concentrations of substances and represent conditions under which it is believed that nearly all workers may be repeatedly exposed day after day without adverse effect. Because of wide variation in individual susceptibility, a small percentage of workers may experience discomfort from some substances at or below the threshold limit a smaller percentage may be affected more seriously by aggravation of a preexisting condition or by development of an occupational illness. Threshold limits are based on the best available information from industrial experience, from experimental human and animal studies, and when possible, from a combination of the three. The basis on which the values are established may differ from substance to substance protection against impairment of health may be a guiding factor for some, whereas reasonable freedom from irritation, narcosis, nuisance, or other forms of stress may form the basis for others. Three categories of TLVs follow ... [Pg.44]

Occupational illnesses and injuries should be diagnosed and treated promptly. The occupational physician, who is familiar with workplace hazards, is uniquely qualified to recognize work-related conditions and should be able to arrange for prompt treatment and rehabilitation. [Pg.36]

We believe that all injuries and occupational illnesses, as well as safety and environmental incidents, are preventable, and our goal for all of them is zero. We will promote off-the-job safety for our employees,... [Pg.434]

Injuries and occupational illnesses can be functions of tlie following... [Pg.184]

Under LNT, the risks of developing cancer from occupational radiation exposure are about the same as the risks of any other occupational illness or injury—about 1 in 10,000. By comparison, the background cancer death rate is about 1,600 in 10,000 (16%), and about 1 person in 7,000 dies each year in traffic accidents (more than 40,000 in the year 2000). For the vast majority of radiation workers, the drive to work is far more hazardous than their occupational radiation exposure, even using the LNT model. [Pg.528]


See other pages where Occupational illnesses is mentioned: [Pg.42]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.540]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.1225]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.1225]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.286]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.94 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.81 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info