Emissions control

The Institute has many-year experience of investigations and developments in the field of NDT. These are, mainly, developments which allowed creation of a series of eddy current flaw detectors for various applications. The Institute has traditionally studied the physico-mechanical properties of materials, their stressed-strained state, fracture mechanics and developed on this basis the procedures and instruments which measure the properties and predict the behaviour of materials. Quite important are also developments of technologies and equipment for control of thickness and adhesion of thin protective coatings on various bases, corrosion control of underground pipelines by indirect method, acoustic emission control of hydrogen and corrosion cracking in structural materials, etc. 

Emission reductions Emissions Emissions control Emission spectrography... 

Control of NO emissions from nitric acid and nitration operations is usually achieved by NO2 reduction to N2 and water using natural gas in a catalytic decomposer (123—126) (see Exhaust control, industrial). NO from nitric acid/nitration operations is also controlled by absorption in water to regenerate nitric acid. Modeling of such absorbers and the complexities of the NO —HNO —H2O system have been discussed (127). Other novel control methods have also been investigated (128—129). Vehicular emission control is treated elsewhere (see Exhaust control, automotive). 

For these reasons, CEC and DOE concluded that the only cost-effective method of getting alcohol fueled vehicles would be from original equipment manufacturers (OEM). Vehicles produced on the assembly line would have lower unit costs. The OEM could design and ensure the success and durabihty of the emission control equipment. 

The initial mechanical system was cmde, but the advancement of engine and emission controls, in particular the use of electronics and computers, has brought about substantial refinement (36). 

S. Albu, "California s Regulatory Perspective on Alternate Euels," 13th North American Motor Vehicle Emissions Control Conf (Tampa, Fla., Dec. 11—14, 1990), Mobile Source Division, California Air Resources Board, El Monte, Calif. 

S. Uimasch, C. B. Moyer, M. D. Jackson, and K. D. Smith, Emissions Control Options forHeavj-Duty Engines, SyPE 861111, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pa., 1986. 

In the United States and increasingly in other parts of the world, environmental regulations prohibit the combustion of all but very low sulfur-content coals without sulfur oxide emission controls. The cost of installing sulfur oxide control equipment together with concern about equipment rehabihty have led to the shipment of the lower rank low sulfur coals from up to 1600 km away from the mining site. 

The plant is designed to satisfy NSPS requirements. NO emission control is obtained by fuel-rich combustion in the MHD burner and final oxidation of the gas by secondary combustion in the bottoming heat recovery plant. Sulfur removal from MHD combustion gases is combined with seed recovery and necessary processing of recovered seed before recycling. 

J. Lanier and co-workers, "Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide Emissions Control in a Coal-Eked MHD System," ASME Winter Annual Meeting Adanta, Ga., Dec. 1979. 

Example 5. There are six dynamometers available for engine testing. The test duration is set at 200 h which is assumed to be equivalent to 20,000 km of customer use. Failed engines are removed from testing for analysis and replaced. The objective of the test is to analy2e the emission-control system. Failure is defined as the time at which certain emission levels are exceeded. 

Conclusions. The impact of plasticizers on the environment is very low and is diminishing as evidenced by analytical data showiag that the levels of phthalates ia surface waters and sediments are decreasiag. This is despite the fact that their usage has continued to iacrease aimuaHy and is most likely due to improved emission controls and wastewater treatment. 

The main areas of commercial apphcation are automotive emission control catalysts (autocatalysts), oil refining, ammonia oxidation, hquid-phase ... 

Automotive Emission Control Catalysts. Air pollution (qv) problems caused by automotive exhaust emissions have been met in part by automotive emission control catalysts (autocatalysts) containing PGMs. In the United States, all new cars have been requited to have autocatalyst systems since 1975. In 1995, systems were available for control of emissions from both petrol and diesel vehicles (see Exhaust control, automotive). 

Emission Control. In 1993, for a net electric power generation of 3196 x 10 kWh, power industry emissions were as follows ... 

Emissions control systems play an important role at most coal-fired power plants. For example, PC-fired plants sited in the United States require some type of sulfur dioxide control system to meet the regulations set forth in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, unless the boiler bums low sulfur coal or benefits from offsets from other highly controlled boilers within a given utiUty system. Flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) is most commonly accomphshed by the appHcation of either dry- or wet-limestone systems. Wet FGD systems, also referred to as wet scmbbers, are the most effective solution for large faciUties. Modem scmbbers can typically produce a saleable waUboard-quaUty gypsum as a by-product of the SO2 control process (see SULFURREMOVAL AND RECOVERY). 

Emission Standards. In order to have a nationwide basis for air pollution emission controls and to set a minimum emission limit, the EPA developed New Source Performance Standards (NSPS). The NSPS set specific poUutant emission limits or describe the best available control technology (BACT) that should be appUed at that source. The EPA has issued NSPS, which apply to new constmction as weU as to large modifications, for many different sources. Sources in the chemical industry include the foUowing. 

NOj Control. NO control limitations are described in both Tide 1 and Tide 4 of the CAAA of 1990. Tide 4 requirements affect only coal-fired boilers and take effect at the same time that the boilers are impacted by CAAA SO2 requirements. As of 1996, EPA had estabHshed Tide 4 NO limits only for tangentially fired and waH-fired, dry-bottom boilers that would be impacted by Phase I of the CAAA SO2 regulations (Tide 4). Limits of 0.22 kg/10 kJ (0.5 lb/10 Btu) and 0.19 kg/10 kJ (0.45 lb/10 Btu) have been set for wall-fired and tangentially fired units, respectively. The EPA based these levels on what was achievable using low NO burners. However, plants can employ a number of different front- or back-end emissions controls, including a combination of options, to achieve these levels. EPA plans to announce Tide 4 NO requirements for 300 additional boilers by late 1996 or eady 1997. 

In the early 1970s, air pollution requirements led to the adoption of the double contact or double absorption process, which provides overall conversions of better than 99.7%. The double absorption process employs the principle of intermediate removal of the reaction product, ie, SO, to obtain favorable equiUbria and kinetics in later stages of the reaction. A few single absorption plants are stiU being built in some areas of the world, or where special circumstances exist, but most industriali2ed nations have emission standards that cannot be achieved without utili2ing double absorption or tad-gas scmbbers. A discussion of sulfuric acid plant air emissions, control measures, and emissions calculations can be found in Reference 98. 

The air stream exiting a stripper may requite some type of emissions control, depending on local and regulatory requirements. Carbon adsorption is often used catalytic oxidation is another option. 

Operating parameters include temperature, pressure, oxygen concentration, and residence time. Materials of constmction include stainless steel, nickel, and titanium alloys (the latter for extremely corrosive wastes containing heavy metals). Vented gases from the process may require scmbbing or other emission controls. 

A U.S. EPA study (41) showed that soil vapor extraction (SVE) is an effective treatment for removing volatile contaminants from the vadose zone. Sandy soils are more effectively treated than clay or soils with higher organic content because higher air flows are possible in sand and clays—organic soils tend to adsorb or retain more contaminants. Removal of volatiles is rapid in the initial phase of treatment and thereafter decreases rapidly thereafter-an important consideration in the design of air emissions control over the life of the project. 

Recent air pollution regulations limit the amount of volatile organic carbon (VOC) that can be discharged from wastewater treatment plants. Benzene is a particular case in which air emission controls are required if the concentration of benzene in the influent wastewater exceeds 10 mg/L. 

---