Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Controls limitations

The chart consists of a central line and two pairs of limit lines or simply of a central line and one pair of control limits. By plotting a sequence of points in order, a continuous record of the quality characteristic is made available. Trends in data or sudden lack of precision can be made evident so that the causes may be sought. [Pg.211]

Special attention should be paid to one-sided deviation from the control limits, because systematic errors more often cause deviation in one direction than abnormally wide scatter. Two systematic errors of opposite sign would of course cause scatter, but it is unlikely that both would have entered at the same time. It is not necessary that the control chart be plotted in a time sequence. In any... [Pg.211]

To determine the standard deviation for the warning and control limits, it is necessary to calculate the variance for each sample, sf. [Pg.716]

Statistical Factors for the Upper Warning Limit and Upper Control Limit... [Pg.717]

Interpreting Control Charts The purpose of a control chart is to determine if a system is in statistical control. This determination is made by examining the location of individual points in relation to the warning limits and the control limits, and the distribution of the points around the central line. If we assume that the data are normally distributed, then the probability of finding a point at any distance from the mean value can be determined from the normal distribution curve. The upper and lower control limits for a property control chart, for example, are set to +3S, which, if S is a good approximation for O, includes 99.74% of the data. The probability that a point will fall outside the UCL or LCL, therefore, is only 0.26%. The... [Pg.718]

The same rules apply to precision control charts with the exception that there are no lower warning and lower control limits. [Pg.721]

Another important quality assessment tool, which provides an ongoing evaluation of an analysis, is a control chart. A control chart plots a property, such as a spike recovery, as a function of time. Results exceeding warning and control limits, or unusual patterns of data indicate that an analysis is no longer under statistical control. [Pg.722]

Regulations specify a considerable Hst of additives and treatments which may be permitted under controlled limits and conditions. It is important to note that no wine receives mote than a few of these treatments, and many have none. For example, most grape musts ferment readily without additions, but some extra nitrogen source for the yeasts is occasionally beneficial. If some is requited, ammonium phosphate is the most commonly used. [Pg.376]

Statistical quaUty control charts of variables are plots of measurement data, preferably the average result of repHcate analyses, vs time (Fig. 2). Time is often represented by the sequence of batches or analyses. The average of all the data points and the upper and lower control limits are drawn on the chart. The control limits are closely approximated by the sum of the grand average plus for the upper control limit, or minus for the lower control limit, three times the standard deviation. [Pg.368]

There are several rules appHed to control charts to spot a lack of randomness. The most obvious is a point outside the control limits. A trend such as a mn, where at least seven consecutive data points are either above or below the average line, or a trend of seven consecutive points either increasing or decreasing in value, also indicates an out of control situation (29). A lack of randomness is also apparent from a pattern in which there is a repeated sequence of points cycling between rising then falling, or when points tend to cluster around the center line or near the control limits. [Pg.368]

NOj Control. NO control limitations are described in both Tide 1 and Tide 4 of the CAAA of 1990. Tide 4 requirements affect only coal-fired boilers and take effect at the same time that the boilers are impacted by CAAA SO2 requirements. As of 1996, EPA had estabHshed Tide 4 NO limits only for tangentially fired and waH-fired, dry-bottom boilers that would be impacted by Phase I of the CAAA SO2 regulations (Tide 4). Limits of 0.22 kg/10 kJ (0.5 lb/10 Btu) and 0.19 kg/10 kJ (0.45 lb/10 Btu) have been set for wall-fired and tangentially fired units, respectively. The EPA based these levels on what was achievable using low NO burners. However, plants can employ a number of different front- or back-end emissions controls, including a combination of options, to achieve these levels. EPA plans to announce Tide 4 NO requirements for 300 additional boilers by late 1996 or eady 1997. [Pg.91]

Specifications for gas turbine fuels prescribe test limits that must be met by the refiner who manufactures fuel however, it is customary for fuel users to define quality control limits for fuel at the point of delivery or of custody transfer. These limits must be met by third parties who distribute and handle fuels on or near the airport. Tests on receipt at airport depots include appearance, distfllation, flash point (or vapor pressure), density, freezing point, smoke point, corrosion, existing gum, water reaction, and water separation. Tests on delivery to the aircraft include appearance, particulates, membrane color, free water, and electrical conductivity. [Pg.411]

The BMS deviation is a measure of the spread of values for c around the mean. A large value of O indicates that wide variations in c occur. The probability that the controlled variable hes between the values of Cl and C9 is given by the area under the distribution between Ci and Cg (histogram). If the histogram follows a normal probabihty distribution, then 99.7 percent of aU observations should lie with 3o of the mean (between the lower and upper control limits). These Emits are used to determine the quality of control. [Pg.735]

One point that occurs outside the upper or lower control limits... [Pg.735]

By the very nature of batch processing, it is inevitable that process equipment will have idle time between batches. The idle time also could occur if the controller is not being used at all times during the execution of the batch (e.g., a flow controller may only be used during the feed of one of the reactants). During the idle time, control considerations such as reset windup must be considered to prevent the control signal from going outside of the control limits. [Pg.112]

It is assumed that the experiments will be conducted at 70 atm (V.lkPa) pressure or lower. Here the pressure rating of the flow controller limits the maximum pressure for the entire unit. The ROTOBERTY is rated for higher pressure, and upgrading the rest to higher pressure can be done when needed. [Pg.86]

Control limits for zero, span, and other control limits... [Pg.223]

The corrective actions to be taken when control limits are exceeded... [Pg.223]

Data quality assessment requirements are related to precision and accuracy. Precision control limits are established, i.e., 4-10% of span value, as calculated from Eq. (15-1). The actual results of the may be used to calculate an average deviation (Eq. 15-3) ... [Pg.224]

Corrective action Do multipoint calibration invalidate data collection since last zero/ span check within control limits... [Pg.224]

In all static surge-detection devices, the actual plienonemon of flow reversal (surge) is not directly monitored. What is monitored are other conditions related to surge. Control limits are set from past experience and a study of compressor characteristics. [Pg.264]

If the dust level is, or could be, above the control limit an employer must ... [Pg.120]

Split-up stocks into manageable lots, e.g. with reference to fire loading/spillage control. Limit stack heights generally... [Pg.248]

Provide ongoing assurance that access and hazard controls limit worker exposure... [Pg.83]

B.D, Nauman, E.V. Sargent, R.S. Starkman, W.J. Fraser, G.T. Becker, and G.D. Kirk. "Pertor-niance-based exposure control limits for pharmaceutical active ingredients. Am. Ind. hlyg. Assoc. ]. 57, 5.3-42, 1996. [Pg.405]

Documentation verifying job set-ups should include documentation to perform the setup and records that demonstrate that the set-up has been performed as required. This requires that you record the parameters set and the sample size and retain the control charts used which indicate performance to be within the central third of the control limits. These records should be retained as indicated in clause 4.16 of the standard. [Pg.369]

You will need to produce more than one part to verify that the process is stable. You need to form a sample large enough to take statistical measurement. If the measurements taken on the product fall within the central third of the control limits then the set-up can be approved - if not, then adjustments should be made and further samples produced until this condition is achieved. The Note in clause 4.9.4 indicates that regardless of the number of parts in the sample, it is the comparisons made on the last part that establish the conditions for commencement of production. [Pg.369]

Control charts - used to detect abnormal trends around control limits... [Pg.458]

Provide procedures for controlling limited life items. [Pg.488]


See other pages where Controls limitations is mentioned: [Pg.2421]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.715]    [Pg.716]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.719]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.736]    [Pg.2552]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.371]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.290 ]




SEARCH



Activation-controlled limit

Asbestos control limits

Capacity-controlled limiting case

Catalyst additives control technology limit

Conduction-controlled limiting case

Control limit

Control limit

Control limit knowledge-based systems

Control limit robust

Control limit selection

Control limit sensor faults

Control limit using contribution plots

Control limit using discriminant analysis

Control limit using statistical methods

Control limit values

Control limits specified

Control warning limit

Control with limited measurements

Controlled clinical trial limitations

Controller Control limits

Controller Control limits

Controller limitations

Controller limitations

Controls controller limitations

Controls controller limitations

Diffusion control limit

Diffusion controlled limit

Diffusion controlled limit, reaction

Diffusion controlled limiting current

Diffusion-controlled limit on reaction rate

Electron transfer diffusion control limit

Electron transfer, activation control diffusion limit

Factors for Computing Control Limits

Laboratory control limits

Limit, short term exposure control

Limitation of Marine Primary Productivity and Control on Ecosystem Structure

Limited controlled evaluation

Limits quality control

Lower control limit

Maximum load limit control

Optical Control Near the Lindemann Limit

Plant costs controller limitations

Plutonium processing control limits

Process controls safe operating limits

Process monitoring tools control limits

Rate-limiting diffusion control

Reaction rates, diffusion controlled limit

Safety performance lower control limit

Safety performance upper control limit

Upper control limit

Upper control limit, UCL

© 2024 chempedia.info