Hazards human health, assessment

Evaluating the evidence of biological hazard often requires skilled scientific judgement. Procedures for assessing biological effects are set out in other parts of this book detailed descriptions of some of the procedures involved in human health assessment and evaluation have been published elsewhere [10-13]. 

The annex V of Directive 67/548/EEC, in the EU document, OECD guidelines for testing method for chemicals, addressing three areas of concern (i) determination of physical-chemical properties (ii) methods for determining effects on human health and (iii) methods for environmental effects. Annex lA of Directive 93/67/EEC is involved with the risk assessment of potential toxic effects concerning human health. The technical guidance document on risk assessment published by the European Commission [4], is involved with human health assessment. Analysis of hazard identification and dose-response assessment is based on the following key points ... 

Provides information on how levels of exposure of hazardous chemicals affect human health. Covers levels of exposure to hazardous chemicals below which no adverse health effects are expected to occur in various segments of the human population. The reference dose and carcinogenicity assessments on IRIS can sen>e as guides in e >aluating potential health hazards and selecting response to alleviate a potential risk to human health. Hours 8 00 a.m. to 4 40 p.m. EST, Monday - Friday. 

Fourteen formulations of chemical alternatives were submitted to EPA under confidentiality and they were assessed based on numerous human health and ecotoxicity endpoints in addition to bioaccumulation potential and environmental persistence. They were also screened for potential exposure to workers, users and the aquatic environment. Where data gaps existed, EPA experts used models and chemical analogs to estimate the hazard for a particular endpoint. The literature and test data reviews were published in the final report, Environmentally Preferable Options for Furniture Fire Safety Low Density Furniture Foam . In addition, each hazard endpoint was ranked with a concern level (High, Moderate or Low) based on the criteria used by the EPA s New Chemicals Program to rate the concern level of new chemicals submitted under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). As seen in Figure 8.2, where the hazard endpoint rankings are bold, the value is based on experimental data. Where the hazard endpoints are presented in italic font, the value is estimated based on models or chemical analogs. In this way, detailed hazard information was summarized and presented in a clear and concise format. 

EPA (1989) indicated that actual doses could not be verified, considered the study inappropriate for human health risk assessment, and rejected it for use in the development of a hazard advisory. No mortality occurred and no toxic effects were noted in beagle dogs (4 per sex per dose group) that received diisopropyl methylphosphonate in the diet (0, 4, 38, or 75 mg/kg/day) for 13 weeks (Hart 1980). 

Soil contamination was not perceived as a problem until the 1970s, when incidents in the U.S. and Europe (Love Canal, NY Times Beach, MO Lekkerkerk, the Netherlands) awakened public awareness about the serious threats posed to human health and the environment by abandoned or improperly managed hazardous wastes. In response to the growing public concern, the U.S., the Netherlands, and a number of other European countries started a systematic effort beginning in 1980 to identify potentially contaminated sites, assess the level of contamination, establish priorities for remediation based on risk assessment studies and gradually implement the required remedial actions. 

Abstract Nowadays, we are living in the global circular economy, where products are produced, used, and finally disposed in different parts of the world. These products have a huge amount of additives, that in many cases can be hazardous if they are not treated properly. The risk assessment of human health and the environment due to exposure to chemical additives is necessary. 

In this chapter the risk assessment is briefly introduced. Risk assessment is divided into four steps hazard identification, hazard characterization, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. This chapter also highlights five risk and life cycle impact assessment models (EUSES, USEtox, GLOBOX, SADA, and MAFRAM) that allows for assessment of risks to human health and the environment. In addition other 12 models were appointed. Finally, in the last section of this chapter, there is a compilation of useful data sources for risk assessment. The data source selection is essential to obtain high quality data. This source selection is divided into two parts. First, six frequently used databases for physicochemical... 

Due to this, it is necessary to assess the risk to human health and the environment due to the exposure to these chemical additives. In this chapter the impacts that a substance can cause to a certain receptor (humans and the environment) and the harms to the receptor at different exposure levels are identified in hazard identification and hazard characterization steps, respectively. Exposure assessment takes into account the amount, frequency, and duration of the exposure to the substance. Finally, risk characterization evaluates the increased risk caused by such exposure to the exposed population. 

Human Health Risk Assessment 3.1 Hazard Identification... 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol (HHRAP) for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities (Final) EPA530-R-05-006 Office of Solid Waste. Washington, DC... 

Measured data on environmental concentrations and human health are scarce and scattered. Hence, environmental modeling was applied in order to generate an overview over the distribution of selected hazardous substances due to informal recycling in Guiyu. As all available models have a specific focus and various pros and cons, four models were chosen, which cover different geographical scales and address different environmental compartments and objectives in order to assess the potential risk of the selected chemicals to humans and the environment. 

Plants used to produce PRPs should be amenable to confinement . Isolation distances were increased, and the cultivation of food and feed crops following a PRP crop was discouraged. New hazard and exposure data for human and livestock health assessment may also be required from PRP-containing traditional food or feed crops prior to the approval of field trials. Exposure risk concerns the potential for PRPs to be present in human food or animal feed, and where exposure can occur, what mechanisms are used to limit biological activity. Hazards included direct toxicity and allergenicity in humans or animals as well as hazards presented by the coproduct streams that result from processing. These latter requirements could place a major burden on proponents to prove their materials are safe prior to even confined field trials. 

The dangerous properties of acute toxicity, irritation, corrosivity, sensitisation, repeated-dose toxicity and CMR are evaluated in terms of their potential toxic effects to workers, consumers and man exposed indirectly via the environment, based on the use for each stage in the lifecycle of the substance from which exposure can occur. Risk assessment is also required if there are reasonable grounds for concern for potential hazardous properties, e.g., from positive in vitro mutagenicity tests or structural alerts. The risk assessment involves comparing the estimated occupational or consumer exposure levels with the exposure levels at which no adverse effects are anticipated. This may be a quantitative risk assessment, based on the ratio between the two values, or a qualitative evaluation. The principles of human health risk assessment are covered in detail by Illing (a.30) and more briefly in Chapter 7 of (73). 

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustor Facilities, EPA 530-D-98-001, July. Washington, D.C. Environmental Protection Agency. 

Australian Government (2008) Phthalates hazard compendium. A summary of physicochemical and human health hazard data for 24 ort/to-phthalate chemicals. Department of Health and Ageing, National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme (NICNAS). Sydney, Australia... 

The Concise International Chemical Assessment Documents (CICADs) (see Figure 2.3) are similar to the EHC documents in providing internationally accepted reviews on the effects on human health and the environment of chemicals or combinations of chemicals. They aim to characterize the hazard and dose-response of exposure to chemicals and to provide examples of exposure estimation and risk characterizations for application at the national or local level. They summarize the information considered critical for risk characterization in sufficient detail to allow independent assessment, but are concise, i.e., not repeating all the information available on a particular chemical. For more detail, readers of individual CICADs are referred to the original source document for the CICAD (either a national or regional chemical evaluation document) or an existing EHC (chemicals series). 

For both human health and the environment, the risk assessment process includes (i) an exposure assessment, (ii) an effect assessment (hazard assessment and hazard characterization -addressed in detail in Chapter 4), and (iii) a risk characterization (addressed in detail in Chapter 8). As a part of the effect assessment, classification and labeling of the substance according to the criteria laid down in Directive 67/548/EEC (EEC 1967) is also addressed (Section 2.4.1.8). 

The data required for the risk assessment in relation to human health can be categorized as data on the identity of the substance, its physico-chemical and toxicological properties, and on exposure. The minimum data set required for a risk assessment depends on the chemical use category (industrial chemical, pesticide, biocide, food additive, food contact material, etc.), the regulation involved, and the goal of the risk assessment. This chapter will focus on the data used in the hazard assessment. 

OECD. 2001b. Harmonised integrated classification system for human health and environmental hazards of chemical substances and mixtures. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 33. Environment Directorate, Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. ENV/JM/MONO(2001)6. Paris OECD. 

Hazard identification is the process of collecting and evaluating information on the effects of an agent on animal or human health and well-being. In most cases, this involves a careful assessment of the adverse effects and what is the most sensitive population. The dose-response assessment involves evaluation of the relationship between dose and adverse effect. Typically, an effort is made to determine the lowest dose or exposure at which an effect is observed. A comparison is often made between animal data and any human data that might be available. Next is exposure assessment, in which an evaluation of the likely exposure to any given population is assessed. Important parameters include the dose, duration, frequency, and route of exposure. The final step is risk characterization, in which all the above information is synthesized and a judgment made on what is an acceptable level of human exposure. In the simplest terms, risk is the product of two factors hazard and exposure (i.e. hazard x exposure = risk). In real risk assessments, all hazards may not be known and exposure is often difficult to quantify precisely. As a result, the calculated risk may not accurately reflect the real risk. The accuracy of a risk assessment is no better than the data and assumptions upon which it is based. 

---