Risk assessment processes

In its guidance documents HM Government (HMG) has used a very similar approach to the HSE s Five Steps to Risk Assessment , which is shown below  

Sources of ignition Sources of fuel Sources of oxygen 

People in and around tlie piemisos People especially at lisk 

Evaluate, remove, reduce and protect from risk 

Evaluate the risk of a fiie occuiring Evaluate the risk to people fiom tire Remove or reduce fiie hazaids Remove or reduce the i isks to people 

Estimates of risks to human health resulting from disposal of hazardous wastes will nearly always be calculated values based on models. Even if health effects were to occur in the future, they are likely to be unobservable in the background of similar effects from all causes. Therefore, mathematical predictions of risks are required. In general, risk assessment is the process by which toxicology data 

---

Research needs identified from risk assessment process... 

Risk Assessment (RA) is routinely used in setting air standards. Give the sequence of steps in the risk assessment process. 

What arc some of the important complications in the "hazard identification step of the health risk assessment process ... 

Once tlie system components and their failure modes have been identified, tlie acceptability of risks taken as a result of such failures must be determined. Tlie risk assessment process yields more comprehensive and better results when reliable statistical and probability data are available. In tlie absence of such data, tlie results are a strong function of tlie engineering judgment of tlie design team. The important issue is tliat both tlie severity and probability (frequency) of the accident must be taken into account. 

Andersen ME, Clewell HJ 3rd, Gargas ME, et al. 1987. Physiologically based pharmacokinetics and the risk assessment process for methylene chloride. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 87 185-205. 

The sheer complexity of environmental mixtnres of EDCs, possible interactive effects, and capacity of some EDCs to bioaccumulate (e.g., in fish, steroidal estrogens and alkylphenolic chemicals have been shown to be concentrated up to 40,000-fold in the bile [Larsson et al. 1999 Gibson et al. 2005]) raises questions about the adequacy of the risk assessment process and safety margins established for EDCs. There is little question that considerable further work is needed to generate a realistic pictnre of the mixture effects and exposure threats of EDCs to wildlife populations than has been derived from studies on individual EDCs. Further discussion of the toxicity of mixtures will be found in Chapter 2, Section 2.6. 

Priority Lists, Risk Assessment process and tracking system in relation to Council Regulation (EEC) 793/93 also known as Existing Substances Regulation (ESR). 

Professor Martel s book addresses specifically some of the more technical eispects of the risk assessment process, mainly in the areas of hazard identification, and of the consequence/effect analysis elements, of the overall analysis whilst where appropriate setting these aspects in the wider context. The book brings together a substantial corpus of information, drawn from a number of sources, about the toxic, flammable and explosive properties and effect (ie harm) characteristics of a wide range of chemical substances likely to be found in industry eind in the laboratory, and also addresses a spectrum of dangerous reactions of, or between, such substances which may be encountered. This approach follows the classical methodology and procedures of hazard identification, analysing material properties eind... 

The risk assessment process has the capacity to dimension, to rank, to focus and to test the sensitivities, the interdependence and the interactive responses of all these component elements. 

Ecotoxicological data based on Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guidelines are also required, and the endpoints for aquatic organisms, such as fish, daphnia, algae and aquatic plants, are needed for utilization as part of the risk assessment process. 

Because the validation of computerized systems is time consuming, expensive and resource intensive, many organizations are challenged to identify and prioritize which systems will be validated. There are organizational and system specific risk factors to consider in the regulated environment. Each organization must establish its own risk assessment process. 

The risk assessment process begins by identifying specific accident scenarios that apply to the facility under review. Steps include ... 

When any decisions regarding process plant buildings are to be made, it is important that the uncertainties in the risk assessment process be clearly understood and that these uncertainties be a consideration in the decision making. 

Furthermore, knowledge on the variability and uncertainty associated with each component of the model should be addressed, and described. For any risk assessment process, the uncertainty of the component is fundamental. 

In recognition of the increased vulnerability of the developing organism, both the U.S. EPA Food Quality Protection Act [77] and the U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Act [78] mandate that infants and children warrant special consideration in the risk assessment process. Immune system ontogeny and the sensitivity of the developing immune system to xenobiotics are discussed in detail in chapter 20 of this volume. 

Luebke, R.W. et al., Immunotoxicogenomics The potential of genomics technology in the immunotoxicity risk assessment process, Toxicol. Sci., (in press). 

The total risk assessment process used by the Swiss is shown in Fig. 38. In Switzerland, an acceptable individual risk has been established to be 3 x 10-/Vyear. It is interesting to note that this value is not far from that footnoted in Table VI, which converts to 10 3/year. But, methods of calculating probabilities in Refs. 41 and 42 are quite different. 

Risk assessment is carried out to enable a risk management decision to be made. It has been argued that the scientific risk assessment process should be separated from the policy risk management process but it is now widely recognised that this is not possible. The two are intimately linked. 

In accordance with this definition, an environmental risk assessment process is used especially in cases when the probability component arises during the calculation of various parameters which can be due to many reasons uncertainty of input information uncertainties in applying an algorithm due to lack of knowledge, insufficient knowledge and/or simplification of input information uncertainties in the defined geographic boundaries of pollutant influence uncertainties in both computer calculations and management operations based on these calculations. 

Consequently, risk assessment process is the obligatory continuation of the process of quantitative calculation and mapping of critical loads of sulfur, nitrogen and acidity at various natural and agricultural ecosystems. This is connected with numerous uncertainties a priori included in the computer algorithm for CL calculations ... 

Although there is no way of knowing how many harmful chemicals were kept off the market since this PMN requirement went into effect, this risk assessment process was never applied so uniformly and thoroughly in pre-TSCA days and in this respect TSCA is meeting one of its major goals. 

Aside from the Premanufacture Notification (PMN) requirements. Section 5 rules have not been used to a great extent. Nearly all of the compliance activity since July of 1979 has been geared toward meeting PMN requirements. Whether the agency s failure to use the subsections of 5 that are designed to restrict potentially harmful substances from reaching the marketplace has resulted from lack of real necessity, a failure in the Agency s risk assessment process, or an inherent non-workability in the Law itself, remains to be seen. 

Subsequent testing that included extensive analyses of air emissions revealed no obvious concerns. The tests consistently showed extremely low levels of organic contaminants in all SCWO effluents. Final determinations of safety and environmental acceptability can only be made through a formal risk assessment process that will occur as part of the permitting program. 

The method(s), supporting validation reports, related knowledge and target specifications are critical inputs into risk assessment process. A review is performed jointly by a transfer team from both sites. There is an assessment of complexity (simple vs. complex) and prior knowledge (similar methods/API/products already transferred vs. no experience), method robustness (low vs. high concern), which can affect quality post transfer (low vs. high risk). 

---