Corrosion, acute

Much toxicological data are available on this red pigment acute oral toxicity in mice, 90-day subchronic toxicological study, acute dermal irritation and corrosion, acute eye irritation and corrosion, anti-tumor effectiveness, micronucleus test in mice, AMES test Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay), estimation of antibiotic activity, and results of estimation of five mycotoxins. A new patent on Arpink Red was filed in 2001 with claims of anti-cancer effects of the anthraquinone derivatives and apphcations in the food and pharmaceutical fields. 

With respect to acute toxicity, based on lethaHty in rats or rabbits, acryhc monomers are slightly to moderately toxic. Mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, throat, and gastrointestinal tract are particularly sensitive to irritation. Acrylates can produce a range of eye and skin irritations from slight to corrosive depending on the monomer. 

Health nd Safety Factors. Thionyl chloride is a reactive acid chloride which can cause severe bums to the skin and eyes and acute respiratory tract injury upon vapor inhalation. The hydrolysis products, ie, hydrogen chloride and sulfur dioxide, are beheved to be the primary irritants. Depending on the extent of inhalation exposure, symptoms can range from coughing to pulmonary edema (182). The LC q (rat, inhalation) is 500 ppm (1 h), the DOT label is Corrosive, Poison, and the OSHA PEL is 1 ppm (183). The safety aspects of lithium batteries (qv) containing thionyl chloride have been reviewed (184,185). 

Health and Safety Factors. MSA is a strong toxic acid and is corrosive to skin. The acute oral toxicity of the sodium salt in mice LD q is 6.2 g/kg. The 1976 edition of the NIOSH Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances Hsts certain reaction products of MSA as having suspected mutagenic, teratogenic, and carcinogenic activity (410). 

The acute oral toxicity and the primary skin and acute eye irritative potentials of dimer acids, distilled dimer acids, trimer acids, and monomer acids have been evaluated based on the techniques specified ia the Code of Eederal Regulatioas (CER) (81). The results of this evaluatioa are showa ia Table 7. Based oa these results, monomer acids, distilled dimer acids, dimer acids, and trimer acids are classified as nontoxic by ingestion, are not primary skin irritants or corrosive materials, and are not eye irritants as these terms are defined ia the Eederal regulatioas. 

Toxic Reactions of the Skin Irritation is the most common reaction of the skin. Skin irritation is usually a local inflammatory reaction. The most common skin irritants are solvents dehydrating, oxidizing, or reducing compounds and cosmetic compounds. Acids and alkalies are common irritants. Irritation reactions can be divided into acute irritation and corrosion. Necrosis of the surface of the skin is typical for corrosion. Acids and alkalies also cause chemical burns. Phenols, organotin compounds, hydrogen fluoride, and yellow phosphorus may cause serious burns. Phenol also causes local anesthesia, in fact it has been used as a local anesthetic in minor ear operations such as puncture of the tympanous membrane in cases of otitis. ... 

In extreme cases irritant chemicals can have a corrosive action. Corrosive substances can attack and weaken materials of construction, as mentioned in Chapter 3. They can also attack living tissue (e.g. to cause skin ulceration and in severe cases chemical burns), kill cells and possibly predispose to secondary bacterial invasion. Thus while acute irritation is a local and reversible response, corrosion is irreversible destruction at the site of the contact. The outcome is influenced by the nature of the compound, the concentration, duration of exposure, the pH (see Figure 4.1) etc. Thus dilute mineral acids may be irritant whereas at higher concentrations they may cause corrosion. 

Vemot EH, Macewen JD, Haim CC, et al. 1977. Acute toxicity and skin corrosion data for some organic and inorganic compounds and aqueous solutions. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 42 417-423. 

Lethal concentrations and doses are parameters of acute, systemic poisoning. There are also specific protocols to evaluate the irritant and corrosive effects on skin, eyes and mucous membranes. 

Waste characteristics, which may limit the effectiveness or feasibility of the remedial technologies quantity/concentration, chemical composition, acute toxicity, persistence, biodegradability, radioactivity, ignitability, reactivity/corrosivity, infectiousness, solubility, volatility, density, partition coefficient, compatibility with chemicals, and treatability... 

A substance can cause one or more effects. Common effects are acute and longterm toxicity, skin irritation, corrosiveness, sensitization, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive effects, and developmental toxicity. 

Skin-Contact Toxicity Data for acute (short-term) exposures of the skin to corrosive and toxic liquids, solids, and gases are extremely limited, particularly where the consequences are severe or fatal injury and the available data may not be useful, from an engineering standpoint. For example, the skin toxicity of hydrogen peroxide to rats is stated as 4060 mg/kg, but the skin area and duration of exposure are not stated. Thus, it is not possible (with the available data) to estimate the relationship among percent of body surface exposed to a corrosive material, the concentration of the corrosive material, the duration of exposure (before removal of the corrosive material), and the severity of the effect. 

The dangerous properties of acute toxicity, irritation, corrosivity, sensitisation, repeated-dose toxicity and CMR are evaluated in terms of their potential toxic effects to workers, consumers and man exposed indirectly via the environment, based on the use for each stage in the lifecycle of the substance from which exposure can occur. Risk assessment is also required if there are reasonable grounds for concern for potential hazardous properties, e.g., from positive in vitro mutagenicity tests or structural alerts. The risk assessment involves comparing the estimated occupational or consumer exposure levels with the exposure levels at which no adverse effects are anticipated. This may be a quantitative risk assessment, based on the ratio between the two values, or a qualitative evaluation. The principles of human health risk assessment are covered in detail by Illing (a.30) and more briefly in Chapter 7 of (73). 

For acute toxicity, corrosivity and skin and eye irritation, values for the NOEL (or NOAEL or LOAEL) are not derived. Therefore, the only option is to determine whether the substance has an inherent capacity to cause such effects and to make a qualitative risk assessment to evaluate the likelihood of an adverse effect occurring in use. 

To test the irritancy potential of substances, two tests which can reliably distinguish between skin corrosives and noncorrosives are endorsed by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). The testing procedures are based on the transcutaneous electrical resistance (TER) measurements of rat skin and on a human skin model. Both test systems [141-145] will be briefly outlined below. Nevertheless, these tests are not suited for the group of mild irritants which do not induce an acute effect on the barrier function. For those substances, new markers need to be evaluated. First results are available for heat shock protein 27 where higher levels were observed in skin models after exposure to mildly irritating chemicals [146, 147]. 

There are four lists of hazardous wastes in the regulations wastes from nonspecific sources (F list), wastes from specific sources (K list), acutely toxic wastes (P list), and toxic wastes (U list) there are also the four characteristics mentioned before ignitability, corrosivity, reactivity, and extraction procedure toxicity. Certain waste materials are excluded from regulation under the RCRA. The various definitions and situations that allow waste to be exempted can be confusing and difficult to interpret. One such case is the interpretation of the mixture and derived-from rules. According to the mixture rule, mixtures of solid waste and listed hazardous wastes are, by definition, considered hazardous. Similarly, the derived-from rule defines solid waste resulting from the management of hazardous waste to be hazardous (40 CFR 261.3a and 40 CFR 261.1c). 

Due to methanol s corrosivity and its affinity for water, it cannot be readily distributed in today s fuel infrastructure. Methanol burns with a nearly invisible flame. Available luminosity additives won t reform in the low-temperature methanol steam reformers. Methanol is more acutely toxic than gasoline. Additives that are likely to be needed for safety and health reasons will impact the fuel processor s performance and cost. 

Symptoms of exposure Produces skin burns. Causes eye irritation on contact. Inhalation may cause irritation of the respiratory tract. Acute toxic effects following ingestion may include corrosion of mouth and gastrointestinal tract, vomiting, diarrhea, ulceration, bleeding from intestines and circulatory collapse (Patnaik, 1992 Windholz et al., 1983). An irritation concentration of 25.00 mg/m in air was reported by Ruth (1986). 

---