Certified, defined

Patent laws provide for several stages in the life of an application for a patent on an invention. The pattern followed by patent laws in effect in most industrialized countries during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and still in effect in the United States in 1995, calls for the examination of all patent appHcations to certify that the claimed invention meets the national standards for novelty, usehilness, and inventiveness. The owner of the technology to be patented files appHcation papers that include a specification containing a description of the invention to be patented (called the disclosure) and claims defining the limits of the invention to be protected by the patent, a formal request for the issuance of a patent, and fees. Drawings of devices and apparatuses, electrical circuits, flow charts, etc, are an important part of the disclosures of most nonchemical and many chemical patents. 

The amount of process plant that can be defined accurately as automatic is relatively small, and manual intervention is often involved at some stage. The relevant design criteria are therefore often IM/12 or IM/18. In practice, fully automatic burner controllers tested and certified by British Gas are available that comply with the requirements of BS 5885. Although these have features which may not be applicable to non-automatic plant, it may be more appropriate to use such a controller, particularly as its safety is well proven. It may also be less expensive than buying and installing separate timers, relays, etc. For some processes (for example, those that do not need and cannot tolerate a long purge) such controllers may not be appropriate. 

Synthetic colorants are classified by the FDA as certified color additives and are defined as synthetically produced organic molecules that have their purities checked by the FDA. " A second category, colorants exempt from certification, includes naturally derived (animal, vegetal, mineral) compounds or their synthetic duplicates. Table 7.3.2 presents a summary of synthetic colorants and their utilization as food additives. 

The most important document, accompanying a CRM is its certificate. ISO Guide 31 (1981) provides guidance for the establishment of certificates, labeling of CRMs, and certification reports. The certificate contains among other information the certified values and their respective uncertainties. As important as this information is the traceability statement, which defines to what references the CRM is traceable. Ideally, a CRM is traceable to a suitable (combination) of SI units. This is not always possible, so other stated references may appear here. Especially when certifying matrix reference materials, making the measurements traceable to SI does not imply that the CRM is traceable to SI as well. The steps necessary to transform the sample into a state that can be measured may have a serious impact on the traceability of the values, and thus on the traceability statement. 

Traceability of measurement results is essential in the establishment of a certified reference material. As stipulated in ISO Guides 30 and 35, a certified reference material can only be certified if there is an uncertainty statement with a traceability statement. Basically, traceability means anchoring. In classical analytical chemistry, that SI system is often the best choice as a reference (= anchoring poinf). However, there is a wide range of parameters either defined by a method or defined by the... 

The three historical approaches to certification mentioned above were recently expanded to identily seven modes that are used at NIST for value assignment for chemical composition (May et al. 2000). These seven modes and the resulting values are summarized in Table 3.13. The basic principles of value assignment remain unchanged however, these modes now provide a well-defined link between the process used for value assignment and the definition of the assigned value (i.e. certified, reference, or information value). The terms described above provide a clear indication of the level of confidence that NIST has in the accuracy of the assigned value. The definition of a certified value implies that NIST must be involved in the measurement process for the value to be classified as a NIST certified value (see modes 1-3 in Table 3.13). Thus, modes 4 and 7, which do not involve NIST measure-... 

Much of the early work with certified reference materials was linked to the derivation of reference methods and there was a period in which primary or definitive (i.e. very accurate but usually very complex) and secondary (or usable) methods were reported e.g. steroid hormones (Siekmann 1979), creatinine (Siekmann 1985), urea (Welch et al. 1984) and nickel (Brown et al. 1981). Although there are some application areas, such as checking the concentrations of preparations listed in a pharmacopoeia, where a prescribed, defined method has to be used, in practice such work is limited. However, this approach to chemical analysis is no longer widely used and will not be further discussed. The emphasis now is placed on using RMs to demonstrate that a method in use meets analytical criteria or targets deemed to be appropriate for the application and to develop figures of merit (Delves 1984). 

Since the CRSs and BRPs are officially certified by the European Pharmacopoeia Commission, which adopts the reports establishing their suitability for the intended use, it should be noted that neither certificates of analysis nor data which are not relevant to the use of the substances as defined by the Ph. Eur. monograph, are provided with the reference products or substances. Information required for the correct use of the chemical reference substance or biological reference preparation is provided. The label on the vials or ampoules gives ... 

Filter samples can be prepared to airborne workplace concentrations by spiking each filter with aqueous solution containing elements with concentrations gravimetrically traceable to ultrapure metals or stoidiiometricaUy well defined oxides. The amormts correspond for some of the materials to current threshold limit values of contaminants in workroom atmospheres provided that the simulated filter has been exposed to one cubic meter of air. The certified values are based on a gravimetric procedure, i.e. weight per volume composition of the primary reference material dissolved in high purity sub-dis-tiUed acids. The National Institute of Occupational Health in Oslo, Norway, has produced several batches of such materials certified for 20 elements. Additionally, information values are reported for four other elements see Table 6.2. 

There is an abundance of references defining and describing the role played by QA, Quality Control (QC) and Total Quality Management (TQM) in a modem commercial analytical laboratory. The role played by reference materials (RMs) and certified reference materials (CRMs) in the pursuit of analytical measurement accuracy is also well documented. 

In their broadest application, CRMs are used as controls to verify in a direct comparison the accuracy of the results of a particular measurement parallel with this verification, traceability may be demonstrated. Under conditions demonstrated to be equal for sample and CRM, agreement of results, e.g. as defined above, is proof. Since such possibilities for a direct comparison between samples and a CRM are rare, the user s claims for accuracy and traceability have to be made by inference. Naturally, the use of several CRMs of similar matrix but different analyte content will strengthen the user s inference. Even so, the user stiU has to assess and account for all uncertainties in this comparison of results. These imcertainty calculations must include beyond the common analytical uncertainty budget (i) a component that reflects material matrix effects, (2) a component that reflects differences in the amount of substance determined, (3) the uncertainty of the certified or reference value(s) used, and 4) the uncertainty of the comparison itself AU this information certainly supports the assertion of accuracy in relation to the CRM. However, the requirement of the imbroken chain of comparisons wiU not be formally fulfilled. 

Matrix Components The term matrix component refers to the constituents in the material aside from those being determined, which are denoted as analyte. Clearly, what is a matrix component to one analyst may be an analyte to another. Thus, in one hand for the case of analyses for elemental content, components such as dietary fibre, ash, protein, fat, and carbohydrate are classified as matrix components and are used to define the nature of the material. On the other hand, reference values are required to monitor the quality of determinations of these nutritionally significant matrix components. Hence, there is a challenging immediate need for certified values for dietary fibre, ash, protein, fat, and carbohydrate. Concomitantly, these values must be accompanied by scientifically sound definitions (e.g. total soluble dietary fibre, total sulpha-ted ash, total unsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, individual lipids, simple sugars, and complex carbohydrates). 

Plant metabolism studies will provide information on the absorption, translocation, dissipation and degradation of the agrochemical. This information defines the residual analytes of regulatory concern that could include either the parent compound or metabolites in the field crops. Plant metabolism studies should be conducted with at least three crop representatives of three different crop groups listed in Table 1. One of the major objectives is to determine the comparative metabolism of the agrochemicals between animals and plants among different plant species. MAFF approves metabolism studies that are conducted in foreign countries, which should be operated under the certified GLP system. 

But in order to understand what needs to be changed, we first need to understand the current situation. In order for a pharmaceutical company to use any analytical method for certifying the properties (efficacy, potency, etc.) of their products, the analytical method has to be validated. Validation , in the parlance of the FDA, is a far cry from what we usually call validation when developing a multivariate spectroscopic method. In fact, what we call validation in spectroscopic calibration (which usually means calculating an SEP, or an SECV) is a far cry from the dictionary definition of validate , which is to make legally valid , where valid is defined as having legal efficacy or force [11],... 

As a first step, the authors built a database of the volatile terpenes for six olibanum samples with certified botanical origin and derived characteristic signatures associated with the botanical origin. In the second step they used these signatures to define the species of samples of different origin (commercial societies or markets from various countries of the Middle East) and to recognise the markers of olibanum in a mixture with other plants substances. 

In analytical chemistry, we do not have a standard mole. Therefore, solutions made up to a well-defined concentration using very pure chemicals are used as a basis from which we can compare other solutions or an instrument scale. This process is calibration . For some analyses, the chemical used may be a Certified Reference Material which has a well documented specification, e.g. in terms of the concentration of a particular species and the uncertainty of the specified value. However, it is not sufficient just to calibrate the apparatus/equipment used, it is important that the complete method of analysis is validated from extraction of the analyte from the sample to the final measurement. 

Define the reference material, including the matrix, the properties to be certified, and their desired levels... 

Recording the NIR spectra. For a set of samples of known identity, either certified by the supplier or confirmed using alternative identification tests, the NIR spectra are recorded in a defined manner. 

Sample analyses should be performed in a laboratory certified for the necessary procedures, and they must be able to meet detection limits in the expected media and chemical mixtures. Some analyses are specified by existing EPA protocols, but this is not the case for agent and agent degradation products. Both the closure plan and the postclosure plan should precisely define the protocols to be used for these classes of compounds, including precision and accuracy for expected contaminants. 

---