Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Benchmarked

Woon D E 1994 Benchmark calculations with correlated molecular wavefunctions. 5. The determination of accurate ab initio intermolecular potentials for He2, Ne2, and A 2 J. Chem. Phys. 100 2838... [Pg.214]

Barker J A and Rettner C T 1992 Accurate potentiai energy surface for Xe/Pt(111) a benchmark gas-surface interaction potentiai J. Chem. Phys. 97 5844... [Pg.916]

Day P N and Truhlar D G 1991 Benchmark calculations of thermal reaction rates. II. Direct calculation of the flux autocorrelation function for a canonical ensemble J. Chem. Phys. 94 2045-56... [Pg.1004]

The situation is very different in indirect gap materials where phonons must be involved to conserve momentum. Radiative recombination is inefficient, resulting in long lifetimes. The minority carrier lifetimes in Si reach many ms, again in tire absence of defects. It should be noted tliat long minority carrier lifetimes imply long diffusion lengtlis. Minority carrier lifetime can be used as a convenient quality benchmark of a semiconductor. [Pg.2884]

We employ the general scheme presented above as a starting point in our discussion of various approaches for handling the R-T effect in triatomic molecules. We And it reasonable to classify these approaches into three categories according to the level of sophistication at which various aspects of the problem are handled. We call them (1) minimal models (2) pragmatic models (3) benchmark treatments. The criterions for such a classification are given in Table I. [Pg.489]

The BDD approach has been applied in a number of studies that employ the parameters derived from the experimental findings [77-85]. The approach has been extended by Duxbury an co-workers, particularly Alijah in its present version, involving the new stretch-bender Hamiltonian [84,85], which follows the idea by HBl [60], it approaches the methods we tentatively call benchmark. ... [Pg.511]

Fig. 3. Average computation time for one step using EGO.VIII on a DEC-Alpha 3300L workstation (175 MHz) for simulation systems of varying size. The insets show some of the protein-water systems used for the benchmark simulations. Fig. 3. Average computation time for one step using EGO.VIII on a DEC-Alpha 3300L workstation (175 MHz) for simulation systems of varying size. The insets show some of the protein-water systems used for the benchmark simulations.
The first finite element schemes for differential viscoelastic models that yielded numerically stable results for non-zero Weissenberg numbers appeared less than two decades ago. These schemes were later improved and shown that for some benchmark viscoelastic problems, such as flow through a two-dimensional section with an abrupt contraction (usually a width reduction of four to one), they can generate simulations that were qualitatively comparable with the experimental evidence. A notable example was the coupled scheme developed by Marchal and Crochet (1987) for the solution of Maxwell and Oldroyd constitutive equations. To achieve stability they used element subdivision for the stress approximations and applied inconsistent streamline upwinding to the stress terms in the discretized equations. In another attempt, Luo and Tanner (1989) developed a typical decoupled scheme that started with the solution of the constitutive equation for a fixed-flow field (e.g. obtained by initially assuming non-elastic fluid behaviour). The extra stress found at this step was subsequently inserted into the equation of motion as a pseudo-body force and the flow field was updated. These authors also used inconsistent streamline upwinding to maintain the stability of the scheme. [Pg.81]

The outlined scheme is shown to yield stable solutions for non-zero Weissenberg number flows in a number of benchmark problems (Swarbric and Nassehi, 1992b). However, the extension of this scheme to more complex problems may involve modifications such as increasing of elemental subdivisions for stress calculations from 3 x 3 to 9 x 9 and/or the discretization of the stress field by biquadratic rather than bi-linear sub-elements. It should also be noted that satisfaction of the BB condition in viscoelastic flow simulations that use mixed formulations is not as clear as the case of purely viscous regimes. [Pg.86]

The potential energy is never known in an absolute sense but is always measured relative to some arbihary benchmark. Let us set the potential energy to zero at the equilibrium bond length, Vq = 0, which is the bottom of the potential energy well. [Pg.115]

Among the few systems that can be solved exactly are the particle in a onedimensional box, the hydrogen atom, and the hydrogen molecule ion Hj. Although of limited interest chemically, these systems are part of the foundation of the quantum mechanics we wish to apply to atomic and molecular theory. They also serve as benchmarks for the approximate methods we will use to treat larger systems. [Pg.170]

D. F. Feller, MSRC Ah Initio Methods Benchmark Suite—A Measurement of Hardware and Software Performance in the Area of Electronic Structure Methods WA Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs, Richland (1993). [Pg.133]

The program can be run either in a serial or parallel execution mode. Both execution modes were stable when tested on a multiprocessor Linux system. Parallel calculations can be run either on parallel computers or networked workstations. Benchmark information is available at the website listed below. [Pg.329]

Monuron Monzomte Moody diagram Mooney viscometer Mooney viscometers MOPAC 5.0 benchmark 4-79Mo-Permalloy Mopping asphalt Morantel [20574-50-9]... [Pg.648]

SPEC benchmark Special-duty propane Special effects Specialty chemicals... [Pg.918]

In the past, commodity chemicals were generally priced on the basis of ROl. Capital cost was the most critical item, and those elements that ate related to capital cost were the principal factors in the selling price (excluding taw material cost in some cases). On this basis, a satisfactory ROl resulted in acceptable values for other criteria such as ROS or sales margin. Many analysts favor ROS as a benchmark for comparison because it is up to date and simple and because it is increasingly difficult to determine a tme ROl based on what profits might be on plants built under indation and expensive capital and constmction costs. [Pg.537]

G. T. Seaborg, "Transuranium Elements, Products of Modem Alchemy," Benchmark Papers in Physical Chemisty and Chemical Physics, Vol. 1, Dowden, Hutchison Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa., 1978. [Pg.205]

Market prices are extremely volatile and follow cycles of advance and decline related to fluctuations ia global iaventories and world economic forces. For example, for northern bleached softwood kraft, which is considered a global benchmark pulp grade, market price went from 840/t ia 1990 down to 440/t ia 1993 as a result of oversupply and worldwide recession (3). By 1995 virtually all of the price losses had been recovered. [Pg.284]

D. Matheson, J. E. Matheson, and M. M. Menke, ReND Decision Quality Association Benchmarking Stuff, Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, Calif., 1993. [Pg.137]


See other pages where Benchmarked is mentioned: [Pg.881]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.515]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.126]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.503 ]




SEARCH



A Possible Benchmark for Solid Metal Fluoride, Lewis Acids Aluminium Chlorofluoride

ADME-PK Screening Benchmarks

Accuracy benchmark

Aromatics benchmarking

Benchmark

Benchmark Calculations for Molecular Systems—Energy and Geometry

Benchmark Dose Method

Benchmark Doses

Benchmark ECCSD calculations

Benchmark Example

Benchmark Process Steam Usage and Energy Cost Allocation

Benchmark Test of Three-Layered ONIOM Method

Benchmark calculations

Benchmark calculations, nuclear magnetic

Benchmark computers

Benchmark correlation consistent basis sets

Benchmark curve

Benchmark data

Benchmark definition

Benchmark docking

Benchmark dose

Benchmark dose , defined

Benchmark dose approach

Benchmark dose concept

Benchmark dose doses

Benchmark dose level

Benchmark dose lower bound

Benchmark explosive

Benchmark formula

Benchmark handling, Renner-Teller effect

Benchmark handling, Renner-Teller effect triatomic molecules

Benchmark indicators, performance

Benchmark interest rate

Benchmark issues

Benchmark levels

Benchmark model system

Benchmark outperforming

Benchmark portfolio strategies

Benchmark problems

Benchmark quality

Benchmark reaction

Benchmark redox couples

Benchmark selection

Benchmark spread

Benchmark steam

Benchmark steam and condensate losses

Benchmark studies on small molecules

Benchmark testing

Benchmark tests

Benchmark timings

Benchmark values

Benchmark yield

Benchmark, test and model systems

Benchmarking

Benchmarking Data Set

Benchmarking Denmark

Benchmarking Energy Intensity

Benchmarking Germany

Benchmarking Italy

Benchmarking Netherlands

Benchmarking Pitfalls

Benchmarking RDP, BPADP, and DecaBDE

Benchmarking Results

Benchmarking Steam System Performance

Benchmarking Sweden

Benchmarking Terms Links

Benchmarking Types

Benchmarking United Kingdom

Benchmarking Your Laboratory

Benchmarking adequacy

Benchmarking administrative costs

Benchmarking architecture

Benchmarking assessment

Benchmarking assessment Process energy benchmark

Benchmarking competitive

Benchmarking data sources

Benchmarking defined

Benchmarking each Chemical in Table

Benchmarking functional

Benchmarking fundamentals

Benchmarking generic

Benchmarking internal

Benchmarking meaning

Benchmarking metrics

Benchmarking model

Benchmarking of the Existing Curriculum

Benchmarking practices

Benchmarking process

Benchmarking purpose

Benchmarking quantum control methods

Benchmarking safety culture data

Benchmarking steam system

Benchmarking steam system efficiency

Benchmarking techniques

Benchmarks Monte Carlo

Benchmarks and Layout Model

Benchmarks for Allocation of Costs

Benchmarks for Science Literacy

Benchmarks general

Benchmarks results

CCSD calculations benchmark testing

Case study benchmark doses

Chemical Shift (Benchmark Values)

Complex Benchmark Functions

Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark

Computational Chemistry Comparison and Benchmark Database

Computational benchmarking

Computer picture-level benchmark

Conjugated benchmarking

Correlation consistent basis sets molecular benchmarks

Custom manufacturing benchmarking

DFT Methods Benchmarking against Systems with Transition Metal Species

Database and Benchmarking Considerations

Efficiency Definition for Benchmarking

Energy benchmarking

Environmental Protection Agency benchmark dose guidance document

Establishing Benchmarking Comparisons

Ethylene benchmarking

Example Benchmark Dose Derivation

Examples of Disaggregation Subgroups and Benchmarks

Experimental results benchmark designs

From benchmark studies to real chemical systems

Full configuration interaction benchmark calculations

Global Benchmarks for Diversity and Inclusion

Global Diversity and Inclusion Benchmarks

Green benchmarking

Hallberg’s benchmark demonstration

Hydrogen benchmarking

Initiatives benchmark

International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project

International handbook of evaluated criticality safety benchmark experiments

Layout Benchmarks

Lennard-Jones benchmark

Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level LOAEL) benchmark

Mathematical Modeling and the Benchmark Dose Method

Maturity benchmark government

Methane benchmarking

Method Benchmark Results

Microstructured benchmarking

Multi benchmarking

Outlook on Database and Benchmarking

Overlap in the Training and Benchmarking Sets

Performance Benchmarking

Performance Metrics and Benchmarking

Pesticides benchmark values

Picture level benchmark

Placement benchmarks

Product benchmarking

Project planning benchmarking

Propane benchmarking

Research benchmarks

Risk assessment benchmark dose

Risk-free benchmark

SPEC benchmarks

SPEC2000 benchmark programs under study

Safety Benchmarks

Safety management benchmarking

Safety, road benchmarking

Small molecules benchmark studies

Sovereign benchmarks

Specify Hazard Criteria for Each Benchmark in the Green Screen

Summary of BMD and BMDL Estimates for n-Propylbromide Using the Benchmark Dose Methodology

Supply chain improvement benchmarking

Swap spreads benchmarks

Synthesis of Benchmark Examples

The Benchmark Dose Concept

The FEBEX benchmark test. Case definition and comparison of different modelling approaches

Time benchmarks

Timeliness of Benchmarking Chemistry

Tools benchmarking

Toxicological benchmark concentration

Toxicological benchmarks

Triatomic molecules benchmark handling

Use of Benchmark Doses in Estimating Non-Cancer Effects

Virtual benchmarking

Why Benchmark the Research Competitiveness of U.S. Chemistry Now

© 2024 chempedia.info