Benchmarking competitive

Benchmark competitive products, to identify areas in which there is a competitive advantage to be achieved. 

Differentiate between internal benchmarking, functional benchmarking, competitive benchmarking, and generic benchmarking. 

The benchmark competitive model is also affected by the existence of fixed costs. Economies of density result in a limited number of firms each of which must price above marginal cost to recoup fixed costs. Therefore not every customer will be able to purchase a product that exactly matches their tastes for safety. The number... 

The liability-as-a-cure-for-imperfect-informationargument is even more dubious when applied to the benchmark competitive model. The competitive model is grounded in the fact that customers have different tastes for safety. In some cases the difference in tastes will be a reflection of variations in the level of pecuniary damages a customer would suffer in the event of an accident. For example, shippers of delicate goods would suffer more pecuniary harm in an accident and consequently have a greater taste for safety. However people who suffer similar harms will have different tastes when risk aversion varies across individuals. Very cautious individuals may suffer considerable anxiety in contemplating risk and be very risk averse, while other individuals may be less troubled by risk. 

The standard requires that goals and plans cover short-term and longer term and be based on analysis of competitive products and on benchmarking inside and outside the automotive industry and the supplier s commodity. 

OS 31] ]R 16a] ]P 23] For benzene nitration, the results achieved in the capillary-flow micro reactor were benchmarked against results claimed in the patent literature (see Table 4.2) [97]. An analysis of conversion, by-product level, reaction time and reaction rate showed that the results achieved in micro reactors and conventional equipment are competitive, i.e. were similar. As tendencies, it seemed that the micro reactor can lead to a lower by-product level owing to its better temperature guiding and that reaction times can be further shortened. However, the corresponding results are not absolutely comparable in terms of reaction conditions and hence further data are required here. 

Benchmarking is used to compare an organization s activity against that of a recognized leader in the market. This will identify opportunities for quaUty improvement and will lead to competitive advantage in the market place. 

November 2002 The Technology Roadmap - suggested actions and targets based on published benchmarks for major fuel cell development programs around the world as well as in the UK. A set of development targets were established with the objective of giving the UK a competitive position in certain fuel cell markets. 

In order to generate the background information for the 5-year plan a complete examination of the existing portfolio is required a review of all activities which affect the conduct of the business. A number of different perspectives are required in order to describe the company s evolution to the current point. These will include activities at subsidiary level and by therapeutic area. They examine activities from the perspective of research, development, manufacturing and marketing. The company s performance will be studied intrinsically and also against competitive benchmarks at product level, therapeutic area level and corporate level. 

Diagnostic approaches typically involve collecting data from a variety of sources. In addition to fact-based analyses, such as competitive benchmarking or value driver analyses, surveys and interviews can help in gaining a better understanding of the company s workings and uncovering the complex roots of performance problems ... 

Executives therefore have to accept that their performance and value generation approach will be benchmarked against those of buyout firms. A better understanding of the buyout recipe should help them stay competitive. 

However, rapidly reducing free allocations may be politically very difficult, and benchmarking is generally far more complex than it appears because of the variety of installation types, processes and products and neither in itself offers ready protection against competitiveness and leakage concerns. If the EU ETS is to be sustained over long periods, and potentially at high carbon prices, we see three main avenues that have the potential to meet all the criteria ... 

Competitive benchmarking. A specific competitor to competitor comparisons for the product or function of interest. 

In spite of these difficulties an intimate knowledge of the structures, composition and the performance of a competitor s existing products should be maintained. To do this properly requires a considerable effort particularly from R D. A significant amount of time and money will need to be expended on the analysis, identification and evaluation of competitive products. Creating a database on the innovative activities of the competition is also useful as a benchmark for a company s own performance. However, it is mainly used as help in identifying gaps in the company s product range, which need to be filled or weaknesses removed. 

Figure 6-3 shows a method for setting specihcations. The list of needs gives a first list of specifications. Quantify the specifications with metrics more about these in a moment. Then benchmark compare your ideas with the competition. Finally discuss what the ideal values would be for the metrics, and which would be just acceptable use these values to set the list of specifications. 

However, a particular position might carry more internal value in your organization than it does in the external marketplace. Then you must define an appropriate person-based compensation level. Therefore, typically some level of internal alignment is used in conjunction with external data to benchmark a position. Benchmark positions are those positions that are easily identified in competitive market salary surveys and are consistently defined by a variety of organizations, which means that most organizations can agree on the job s scope of responsibility and organizational importance. 

A corporate structure that copies the venture capital approach seems to be the most effective way to achieve these objectives. The new business - a relatively independent entity, as described above - is controlled by the parent company through staged financing, given when pre-agreed milestones have been reached. These should include not only internal milestones defined, for example, by specific R D achievements, but also externally driven ones reflecting important steps towards market success, based perhaps on initial results of user tests, consumer research results, competitive benchmarks, and so on. The parent company should supply services to the new business on the basis of well-defined price and resource agreements. 

Note "Other" category includes the commitment of large-scale, benchmark chemical companies to sustainable development, product portfolio growth innovation and distinct competitive advantage experienced. 

---