Benchmarking Types

Ah experimental program was initiated during the past year af the Baltelle-operated Critic Mass Laboratory to obtain confirmatory, benchmark-type criticality data on conditions typically present in fuel element storage facilities and shipping casks. The results of the initial... 

A series of experiments wus performed recently at the Battelle-operated Critical Mass Laboratory to provide benchmark-type, criticality data for shipping casks used in transporting LWR-type fuels. In conjunction with the experiments, a series of calculations was also performed for the purpose of correlating the experiments with theory... 

Another way of interpreting absolute risk estimates is through the use of benchmarks or goals. Consider a company that operates 50 chemical process facilities. It is determined (through other, purely qualitative means) that Plant A has exhibited acceptable safety performance over the years. A QRA is performed on Plant A, and the absolute estimates are established as calibration points, or benchmarks, for the rest of the firm s facilities. Over the years, QRAs are performed on other facilities to aid in making decisions about safety maintenance and improvement. As these studies are completed, the results are carefully scrutinized against the benchmark facility. The frequency/consequence estimates are not the only results compared—the lists of major risk contributors, the statistical risk importance of safety systems, and other types of QRA results are also compared. As more and more facility results are accumulated, resources are allocated to any plant areas that are out of line with respect to the benchmark facility. 

The toxic chemical release data obtained from TRI provides detailed information on the majority of facilities in the iron and steel industry in the United States. It also allows for a comparison across years and industry sectors. Reported chemicals are limited however to the 316 reported chemicals. The TRI is important to look at not only from understanding the magnitude and types of pollutants, but from the standpoint of individual plant operations benchmarking their environmental performance against industry averages. 

A P2 audit differs from most other types of audits because it makes use of a dual benchmarking approach namely, it uses both technical (environmental performance) and financial performance as its basis for making corrective actions. The status quo most often serves as the benchmark, though other standards certainly can be devised. A P2 audit can also affect non-environmental issues. The types of corrective actions can affect other types of wastes, energy, occupational safety, product quality, and worker productivity. 

The model in question may serve as a benchmark, or as a reference system, for several extensions. In particular, the adsorption of simple fluids in cross-hnked and branched-chain molecules may be studied as the next logical step. Adsorption of a two-component fluid mixture in a matrix of chain molecules made of two types of monomer with different fluid-matrix affinity may exhibit interesting features. 

Because of the commercial availability of interferometers that have a repeatability around 1 nm peak-to-valley (P-V) at any pixel location in the detector, the discussion will be limited to the use of interferometric tests but the principles apply to any type of optical test device. Using this 1 nm repeatability as a benchmark, it will be easy to demonstrate where some of the other testing problems occur long before we hit the repeatability benchmark. 

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests whether one group of subjects (e.g., batch, method, laboratory, etc.) differs from the population of subjects investigated (several batches of one product different methods for the same parameter several laboratories participating in a round-robin test to validate a method, for examples see Refs. 5, 9, 21, 30. Multiple measurements are necessary to establish a benchmark variability ( within-group ) typical for the type of subject. Whenever a difference significantly exceeds this benchmark, at least two populations of subjects are involved. A graphical analogue is the Youden plot (see Fig. 2.1). An additive model is assumed for ANOVA. 

These ligands were active for allyhc substitutions but the process was not enantioselective in the benchmark reaction (88, in Scheme 49). More structurally constrained chelates led, however, to measurable enantioselectivities 40% ee for 89, 50% ee for 90, and 64% ee for 91 in the test reaction. By further modifications in the structure of these bipyridine-type hgands (see 92 in Scheme 51, a chiral Ci-symmetric 2,2 -bipyridine) [126], enantioselectivities up to 89% were obtained. 

OS 63] [R 27] [R 18] [P 46] Using a slit-type interdigital micro mixer prior to a liquid/liquid reaction system improves the conversion to 80%, hence close to the kinetic limits [117]. This is an improvement over using a microgrid in front of the reactor (see the Section Conversion/selectivity/yield - benchmarking to batch processing/kinetics, above). 

The main hardware types offered by physics are mentioned, namely trapped ions (or trapped atoms), quantum dots, quantum optical cavities, rf superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) and nitrogen-vacancy (NV) defects on diamond. Some are important simply as a benchmark to evaluate the quality of the implementations offered by chemistry, whereas others might be combined with lanthanide complexes to produce heterogeneous quantum information processors which combine the advantages of different hardware types. 

Pressurised pipes for water and gas provide an example of design lives being predicted with confidence on the basis of a large assembly of data, of benchmark quality control tests for existing products, and of two-parameter accelerated testing for new ones. Some types of pipe are particularly sensitive to pressure extremes. Lifetime prediction cannot however take into account poor installation conditions. 

Before you begin learning and reviewing the integers and absolute value, take a few minutes to take this ten-question Benchmark Quiz. These questions are similar to the type of questions that you will find on important tests. When you are finished, check the answer key carefully to assess your results. Your Benchmark Quiz analysis will help you determine how much time you need to spend on the integers and absolute value, and the specific areas in which you need the most careful review and practice. 

How did you do on the Benchmark Quiz Check your success in working with fractions and decimals here, and then analyze your results to figure out your plan of attack to master these topics. The answer explanations will give you an indication of what is required to solve these types of problems. 

---