Method Benchmark Results

If affordable, there is a range of very accurate coupled-cluster and symmetry-adapted perturbation theories available which can approach spectroscopic accuracy [57, 200, 201]. However, these are only applicable to the smallest alcohol cluster systems using currently available computational resources. Near-linear scaling algorithms [192] and explicit correlation methods [57] promise to extend the applicability range considerably. Furthermore, benchmark results for small systems can guide both experimentalists and theoreticians in the characterization of larger molecular assemblies. 

The development of these explicit-rjj methods has yielded a database of benchmark results for small polyatomic molecules. These calculations are listed as MP2-R12 and CCSD(T)-R12 in our tables. We have selected the version called MP2-R12/A as a benchmark reference for our study of the convergence to the MP2 limit. This is the version that Klopper et al. found to agree best with our interference effect. The close agreement with extrapolations of one-electron basis set expansions justifies this choice. 

The initial benchmark results obtained with the full CCSD-R12 method [34] testified that the various simplified CCSD-R12 methods reported earlier were highly accurate approximations to the full CCSD-R12 method unless the basis set was too small. The assumptions about the relative importance of diagrammatic terms made in these simplified methods were proven to be valid. However, these neglected terms do not increase the computational cost scaling of CCSD-R12 and there appears no need to eliminate them from full CCSD-R12, once they are implemented. In other words, it is important to distinguish whether a certain approximation is motivated by a compromise between accuracy and the computational cost or by that between accuracy and the development cost. The latter has become increasingly unjustifiable with the advent of computerized derivation and implementation. 

Fuel-specific benchmarks applied to existing power stations create incentives to shift production towards more C02-intensive generators. Whether we refer to fuel-specific updating or NE allocation, for any given price of C02, these allocation methods will result in C02 emissions in excess of the auctioning case. If operators and investors expect that future NAPs are similar to current NAPs, then they anticipate receiving fuel-specific allocation in the future. If the C02 budget were fixed, this would imply that C02 prices, and hence electricity prices, would have to rise. 

In the future, the BMCqs and MLEqi for lethality will be determined, presented, and discussed. Results from the above models will be compared with the log probit EPA (2000) benchmark dose software (http //www.epa.gov/ncea/ bmds.htm). In all cases, the MLE and BMC at specific response levels will be considered. Other statistical models such as the Weibull may also be considered. Since goodness-of fit-tests consider an average fit, they may not be valid predictors of the fit in the low-exposure region of interest. In this case, the output of the different models will be plotted and compared visually with the experimental data to determine the most appropriate model. The method that results in values consistent with the experimental data and the shape of the exposure-response curve will be selected for AEGL derivations. 

The coupled-channel calculations are used as benchmark results to check simple models of the impact parameter dependence of the electronic energy loss. A detailed description of such models (convolution approximation) may be found elsewhere [25,26]. Here we present only a short outline of the method. The electronic energy loss involves a sum over all final target states for each impact parameter. Usually this demands a computational effort that precludes its direct calculation in... 

Pu, J., Teuhiae, D. G. (2004) Benchmark results for hydrogen atom transfer between carbon centers and validation of electronic structure methods for bond energies and barrier heights,/. Phys. Chem. A 108, 2475-2486. 

We hope that this chapter will provide a useful guide for researchers in the field of theoretical chemical dynamics who wish to study these and related subjects and to further develop methodologies for studying more complex dynamical systems. Some of the rigorous quantum dynamics calculations for several prototype systems presented in this chapter could serve as benchmark results against which future development of approximate but more efficient methods could be tested. 

Data mining methods are widely available and can often be highly sophisticated algorithms that use advanced techniques from computer science and artificial intelligence. However, simple and intuitive methods can often work well, without much loss in predictive ability. With small datasets, where the focus is developing interpretable models, these simple methods may be the best first approach, perhaps as part of a conscious elfort to explore the data. In any case it is useful to have some benchmark result against which the performance of more complex, computationally expensive and difficult to interpret methods can be compared. The simplest naive model is prediction by the mean of the dataset, which is in elfect prediction without using a model, and this can serve as a useful reality check and comparator. 

This is an area that has benefited enormously from the use of supercomputers and mini-supercomputers. The theories described in this review are almost all based on a coupled-channel expansion of the wavefiinction and the numerical woik involved in the calculation is largely concerned with matrix manipulations and the computations of multidimensional integrds. These are all operations that are made efficient through the use of computers with vector processing capabilities. Furthermore, the power of these computers has enabled more accurate calculations to be performed on more compUcated systems which have provided benchmark results that have allowed the accuracy of the many approximate methods to be properly calibrated. Also, the new computers have now made it possible to perform approximate computations on quite large molecules of real chemical interest such as aromatic molecules. The impact of these types of calculations on experimental chemistry is already being realised and will become even more significant in the years to come. 

From the theoretical point of view, this relaxation process has been the subject of a large number of quantum dynamics investigations, based on reduced and full dimensional models. Farly works [13-17] reported three- and four-mode models and showed that a simple two-state four-dimensional model provides a qualitatively correct simulation of the UV absorption spectrum [17], These models were used to simulate various spectroscopic signals, including time-resolved transient absorption [18-20], and ionization [21] spectra, fluorescence [22] and resonance Raman spectra [23]. Worth et al. [24-27] performed accurate quantum dynamics simulations based on a model including the twenty-four vibrational modes of the molecule using the MCTDH method. These benchmark results have then been used to test various approximate methods for the simulation of non-adiabatic dynamics of molecular systems [28 0]. 

To illustrate the accuracy that can be obtained by modem quantum chemical methods, the results for a benchmark set of molecules is now briefly discussed. An outline of the theoretical background of the applied methods is... 

Coupled cluster methods (CCSD (T) in particular) provide high-accuracy results (often within 0.1 kcal/mol) for many types of molecules (e.g., organic molecules), but have more difficulties with transition metal-containing species. The method scales as If and at present can conveniently be applied only to small molecules, where it is however quite valuable in producing benchmark results. 

---