Pesticide authorization

Because parts of the model are used in the Dutch pesticide authorization procedure to estimate worker exposure during re-entry, a study was conducted to validate some of the aspects of the proposed model. Emphasis was put on the relationship between hie applied amount of active ingredient and the resulting increase of DFR in relevant zones (crop heights), as well as determining factors (i.e., application techniques and crop density, or leaf volume index). In addition, the influence of re-entry time and crop density on transfer factors (calculated from levels of re-entry exposure and either DFR or SFR) was studied. 

Zosa, M., 1978. In Restricted Pesticides in the Philippines (leaflet), Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority, Philippines. 

Pesticide users are responsible for properly dealing with empty pesticide containers, excess usable pesticides, and waste mataials that contain pesticides or their residues. There is growing concern about the serious harm to humans and the environment that improper disposal of pesticide wastes can cause. For information on disposal options available in your local area, contact your State or tribal pesticide authority. 

The Pesticide Authorization Board decided to withdraw all applications of aiachlor from... 

Population Modeling in the Regulatory Context of Pesticide Authorization... 

Canadian pesticide authority resides in two Acts of Parliament the Pesticide Control Products Act administered by... 

Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority of the Philippines. 1975. FIA Brand Resolution No, 2-75 (Philippine Fertilizer Regulatory Law), Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines. 

The salt is packaged ia 45-kg multiwaH bags or fiber dmms of 45, 170, or 181 kg. It is available ia both powdered and granular forms with densities of 1.04 and 1.44 g/cm (65 and 90 lb/fT), respectively. Only the powdered grade is authorized by and registered with the EPA for use ia pesticide formulations, with the further proviso that it must be tinted blue or green, or otherwise discolored. The word poison appears on all labels together with first-aid information. 

Bentazone has been monitored in the NRA Anglian Region since 1993 and the results show that bentazone is regularly present in surface and groundwaters. Currently there are no restrictions on its use, but bentazone is due to be reviewed under the Authorizations Directive, the new European legislation for pesticide approvals, and the issue of water pollution will be raised. 

TABLE 5.24 Toxicity Studies for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, Pesticides, Food Additives, and Other Chemicais Utilizing Experimental Animals and Other Systems Required by Health Authorities... 

The application of automated GPC for the clean-up of various matrices has been demonstrated by other authors (58, 59). As well as organophosphorus pesticides, conventional methods for the analysis of organochlorine pesticides (OPCs) in fatty samples may involve various clean-up methods, such as LC or GPC. The main... 

Pesticide use was not Carson s chosen topic. She preferred to author works that simply fostered a deeper appreciation of nature. A shy and soft-spoken woman, Carson wrote with an Albert Schweitzer-like reverence for life. All was sacred to her. Her style was lyrical, vivid, and romantic, falling mostly within the nature-writing tradition. She gave her creatures anthropomorphic characteristics, set them in dramatic situations, hoping, she said, to make animals in the woods or waters, where they live, as alive to others as they are to me. ... 

Tables 2.6 and 2.7 give examples of the modes of action of pollutants in animals and in plants/fungi, respectively. It is noteworthy that many of the chemicals represented are pesticides. Pesticides are designed to be toxic to target species. On the other hand, manufacturers seek to minimize toxicity to humans, beneficial organisms and, more generally, nontarget species. Selective toxicity is an important issue. Regardful of the potential risks associated with the release of bioactive compounds into the environment, regulatory authorities usually require evidence of the mode of toxic action before pesticides can be marketed. Other industrial chemicals are not subject to such strict regulatory requirements, and their mode of action is frequently unknown.

With the acceptable concentrations of herbicides in drinking water being taken to very low levels by some regulatory authorities (e.g., the EC), there has been interest in very low levels of atrazine present in some samples of groundwater and in drinking water. This finding illustrates the point that mobility of pesticides becomes increasingly evident as sensitivity of analysis improves. 

Many of these tests gave evidence for changes in behavior following exposure to neurotoxic pesticides. The author concludes that significant behavioral effects were often recorded down to one order of magnitude below the LCjo in question. Some tests, such as operant tests, were relatively simple and gave reproducible results, but it was difficult to evaluate the relevance of these to survival in the wild. Other tests, such as breeding behavior and prey capture, were more complex and less reproducible, but more relevant to the natural world. 

When EPA became aware almost five years ago that N-nitroso contaminants occurred in a number of pesticide products, the Agency immediately acted on the authority of Section 3 of FIFRA to place a moratorium on new registrations of pesticides suspected to contain N-nitroso contaminants at detectable levels (this term is defined and explained later in the text). As has been discussed in other papers of the Symposium, many N-nitroso compounds are animal carcinogens and, consequently, suspected human carcinogens. 

Until 1991, manufacturers seeking authorizations for pesticides had to fulfil country-specific requirements of validation of enforcement methods. The term enforcement method means analytical methods which are developed for post-registration control and monitoring purposes. The harmonization of these requirements was initiated with the European Economic Community (EEC) Council Directive 91/414/EEC and temporarily finalized with the Guidance Document on Residue Analytical Methods SANCO/825/00 rev. 6, dated 20 June 2000 [Santd et Protection des Consommateurs (SANCO)]. The evaluation of validation studies by the competent authority is conducted by comparison of these European Union (EU) requirements with the study results and most often without any practical experience of the method. Some details of this evaluation are discussed below. 

The requirements regarding commodities which are difficult to analyze are also not very clear. The listed crops do not cause difficulties in each kind of determination [e.g., brassica or bulb vegetables in gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS)]. On the other hand, different species of the same crop may have different interference peaks, which may or may not affect quantitation. Presumably, the easiest approach is to perform additional validations, even if the final extracts are not difficult to analyze. In the author s experience, validations should generally include hops and tobacco, if the pesticide is used in these crops. 

The primary focus of FIFRA is to provide federal control of pesticide distribution, sale, and use. Under FIFRA, the ERA was given authority to study the consequences of pesticide usage. FIFRA requires that all pesticide uses in the United States be registered by ERA. Registration assmes that pesticides will be properly labeled and that if produced and used in accordance with specifications, pesticides will not cause unreasonable harm to the environment. ... 

The MDL and practical quantitation limit (PQL) should be appropriate for the objectives of the analysis. MDL refers to the minimum concentration of the compound of interest that can be measured and reported with a specified confidence (99% probability) that the concentration is above zero. The registrants must provide or develop an analytical method for water for the parent pesticide and its degradates that has an MDL of 0.01% of the label application rate (calculated as the average concentration in the top six inches of soil), or 0.05 pgL , whichever is lower. PQL refers to the lowest concentration at which the laboratory can confidently quantify the concentration of the compound of interest. The study authors must report all samples with concentrations above the MDL as detections, including those below the PQL in which the concentration cannot be quantified. In addition, the study authors must provide sample equations to demonstrate how the PQL was calculated. 

Technology providers use quantitative immunoassays to determine expression data of field material for regulatory submissions. Regulatory authorities require that expression levels of introduced proteins in various plant parts be determined by quantitative, validated methods. Immunoassays are also used to generate product characterization data, to assess food, feed and environmental characteristics, to calculate concentrations for toxicology studies and to obtain tolerance exemption or establish tolerances for pesticidal proteins. 

The development of a robust analytical method is a complex issue. The residue analyst has available a vast array of techniques to assist in this task, but there are a number of basic rules that should be followed to produce a reliable method. The intention of this article is to provide the analyst with ideas from which a method can be constructed by considering each major component of the analytical method (sample preparation, extraction, sample cleanup, and the determinative step), and to suggest modern techniques that can be used to develop an effective and efficient overall approach. The latter portion emphasizes mass spectrometry (MS) since the current trend for pesticide residue methods is leading to MS becoming the method of choice for simultaneous quantitation and confirmation. This article also serves to update previous publications on similar topics by the authors. ... 

---