Mass spectrometry MS methods

The relative stereochemistry of hyperaspine 93 was determined by 2-D NMR spectroscopic and mass spectrometry (MS) methods. It has a m-fused bicyclic conformation 93a <2001TL4621>. The trans-fused one is disfavored by an axial pentyl group at C-8 and by a destabilizing dipole-dipole interaction between the N- and O-atoms, which does not exist in the alternative //.(-conformation. The geminal coupling constant of C( 1 )H2 in 93 (11.0 Hz), and that of its 6-hydroxy derivative (11.2 Hz), indicates that they exist preferentially in / //-conformations, whereas their 6-epimers adopt trans-conformations (9.3 and 8.4 Hz, respectively) <2005EJ01378>. Nuclear Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (NOESY) studies also confirmed the stereochemistry of 93 by the marked nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) correlation between H-3 and H-4a <20030L5063>. 

High-throughput proteomic methods hold great promise for the discovery of novel protein biomarkers that can be translated into practical interventions for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease. These approaches may also facilitate the development of therapeutic agents that are targeted to specific molecular alterations in diseases such as cancer. In many cases, malignant cells yield unique protein profiles when total protein extracts from such cells are analyzed by 2-D gel electrophoresis or mass spectrometry (MS) methods. Such proteomic studies have the potential to provide an important complement to the analysis of DNA and mRNA extracts from these tissues.1... 

Figure 11.3 Comparison of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) and mass spectrometry (MS) methods of detection in an overall high-speed screening system.

Fascinating possibilities are opened by combining ACE with different mass spectrometry (MS) methods in order to overcome the main disadvantage of classical CE and IJV detection the lack of sensitivity. The hyphenated methods are very sensitive and allow us to characterize interactions of very small quantities of molecular entities. 

Common Mass Spectrometry (MS) Methods Used in Recent Years for Flavonoid Analyses... 

A GC mass spectrometry (MS) method following SFE was used to determine amphetamines in hair. Following sequential washes with sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), CH2CI2, methanol, and water, and drying, the sample was extracted with 90% CO2 and 10% CHCls/isopropanol at 262 bar and 70°C in the dynamic extraction mode for 30 min. Mephentermine was used as an internal standard. The detection limits were 0.02-0.1 ng/mg, relative standard deviations were 11-28%, and recoveries were 71-84%. 

Analytical measurements for the determination and quantihcation of oxazole- and oxazine-related compounds in tobacco and tobacco smoke include gas chromatography (GC) with packed or capillary columns, high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) usually with reverse phase (RP) columns, and mass spectrometry (MS) methods (GC-MSandLC-MS). 

Numerous ambient direct ionization methods have been introduced for use with mass spectrometry over the last several years.< - °) A major advantage of these methods is speed of analysis, which is achieved not only by the fast insertion and ionization of the sample, but by the elimination of most sample preparation and chromatographic separations. However, this presents a problem in materials analysis and for mixtures in general because of the complexity of the mass spectra that result from direct analysis of complex mixtures. The atmospheric solids analysis probe (ASAP)< > mass spectrometry (MS) method offers some separation related to volatility by control of the heated gas used to effect vaporization, but this is not sufficient for many mixtures. Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) offers rapid gas-phase separation of ions based on differences in charge state and collision cross section (CCS) (size/shape). Here we explore the utility of a commercial IMS/MS instrument with ASAP sample introduction for analysis of complex mixtures. 

Therefore, the target-compound monitoring based on mass spectrometry (MS) methods that use single reaction monitoring (SIM) or selected reaction monitoring (SRM) modes, is often insufficient to assess the quality of environmental water, because only a limited number of analytes are recorded (rarely more than 100 compounds), while unknown and potentially harmful micro-contaminants present might represent a threat to environment and human health. 

To highlight the continued development and importance of mass spectrometry (MS) methods, we have moved this material to the early part of the text and spht it into two chapters, one on theory and instrumentation (Chapter 3) and the other on detailed structural analysis using characteristic fragmentation patterns of common functional groups (Chapter 4). 

In many applications in mass spectrometry (MS), the sample to be analyzed is present as a solution in a solvent, such as methanol or acetonitrile, or an aqueous one, as with body fluids. The solution may be an effluent from a liquid chromatography (LC) column. In any case, a solution flows into the front end of a mass spectrometer, but before it can provide a mass spectrum, the bulk of the solvent must be removed without losing the sample (solute). If the solvent is not removed, then its vaporization as it enters the ion source would produce a large increase in pressure and stop the spectrometer from working. At the same time that the solvent is removed, the dissolved sample must be retained so that its mass spectrum can be measured. There are several means of effecting this differentiation between carrier solvent and the solute of interest, and thermospray is just one of them. Plasmaspray is a variant of thermospray in which the basic method of solvent removal is the same, but the number of ions obtained is enhanced (see below). 

Spectrometric Analysis. Remarkable developments ia mass spectrometry (ms) and nuclear magnetic resonance methods (nmr), eg, secondary ion mass spectrometry (sims), plasma desorption (pd), thermospray (tsp), two or three dimensional nmr, high resolution nmr of soHds, give useful stmcture analysis information (131). Because nmr analysis of or N-labeled amino acids enables determiaation of amino acids without isolation from organic samples, and without destroyiag the sample, amino acid metaboHsm can be dynamically analy2ed (132). Proteia metaboHsm and biosynthesis of many important metaboUtes have been studied by this method. Preparative methods for labeled compounds have been reviewed (133). 

Other spectroscopic methods such as infrared (ir), and nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr), circular dichroism (cd), and mass spectrometry (ms) are invaluable tools for identification and stmcture elucidation. Nmr spectroscopy allows for geometric assignment of the carbon—carbon double bonds, as well as relative stereochemistry of ring substituents. These spectroscopic methods coupled with traditional chemical derivatization techniques provide the framework by which new carotenoids are identified and characterized (16,17). 

Although GC/MS is the most widely used analytical method that combines a chromatographic separation with the identification power of mass spectrometry, it is not the only one. Chemists have coupled mass spectrometers to most of the instruments that are used to separate mixtures. Perhaps the ultimate is mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (MS/MS), in which one mass spectrometer generates and separates the molecular ions of the components of a mixture and a second mass spectrometer examines their fragmentation patterns ... 

Sample concentration, and hence enrichment, is certainly a key issue in this area of analysis, since complementary information obtained from NMR or IR spectroscopic detection is often desirable in conjunction with mass spectrometry. Detection methods such as these have far higher concentration thresholds than MS and obtaining adequate quantities of material for detection becomes a significant challenge. 

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a method for obtaining sequence and structural information by measurement of the mass-to-charge ratios of ionized molecules before and after dissociation reactions within a mass spectrometer which consists essentially of two mass spectrometers in tandem. In the first step, precursor ions are selected for further fragmentation by energy impact and interaction with a collision gas. The generated product ions can be analyzed by a second scan step. MS/MS measurements of peptides can be performed using electrospray or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization in combination with triple quadruple, ion trap, quadrupole-TOF (time-of-flight), TOF-TOF or ion cyclotron resonance MS. Tandem... 

Several methods are available for the analysis of trichloroethylene in biological media. The method of choice depends on the nature of the sample matrix cost of analysis required precision, accuracy, and detection limit and turnaround time of the method. The main analytical method used to analyze for the presence of trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroethanol and TCA, in biological samples is separation by gas chromatography (GC) combined with detection by mass spectrometry (MS) or electron capture detection (ECD). Trichloroethylene and/or its metabolites have been detected in exhaled air, blood, urine, breast milk, and tissues. Details on sample preparation, analytical method, and sensitivity and accuracy of selected methods are provided in Table 6-1. 

Reliable analytical methods are available for determination of many volatile nitrosamines at concentrations of 0.1 to 10 ppb in a variety of environmental and biological samples. Most methods employ distillation, extraction, an optional cleanup step, concentration, and final separation by gas chromatography (GC). Use of the highly specific Thermal Energy Analyzer (TEA) as a GC detector affords simplification of sample handling and cleanup without sacrifice of selectivity or sensitivity. Mass spectrometry (MS) is usually employed to confirm the identity of nitrosamines. Utilization of the mass spectrometer s capability to provide quantitative data affords additional confirmatory evidence and quantitative confirmation should be a required criterion of environmental sample analysis. Artifactual formation of nitrosamines continues to be a problem, especially at low levels (0.1 to 1 ppb), and precautions must be taken, such as addition of sulfamic acid or other nitrosation inhibitors. The efficacy of measures for prevention of artifactual nitrosamine formation should be evaluated in each type of sample examined. 

The most significant differences (i.e. independence) in the analytical methods are provided in the final chromatographic separation and detection step using GC/ MS and LC-FL. GC and reversed-phase LG provide significantly different separation mechanisms for PAHs and thus provide the independence required in the separation. The use of mass spectrometry (MS) for the GC detection and fluorescence spectroscopy for the LG detection provide further independence in the methods, e.g. MS can not differentiate among PAH isomers whereas fluorescence spectroscopy often can. For the GC/MS analyses the 5% phenyl methylpolysiloxane phase has been a commonly used phase for the separation of PAHs however, several important PAH isomers are not completely resolved on this phase, i.e. chrysene and triphenylene, benzo[b]fluoranthene and benzofjjfluoranthene, and diben-z[o,h]anthracene and dibenz[a,c]anthracene. To achieve separation of these isomers, GC/MS analyses were also performed using two other phases with different selectivity, a 50% phenyl methylpolysiloxane phase and a smectic liquid crystalline phase. 

On the other hand, if only specific GC detectors, e.g. the electron capture, nitrogen-phosphorus or flame photometric detectors, are tested, the argument of lack of GC method sensitivity is not acceptable. In most cases mass spectrometric detectors provide the sensitivity and selectivity needed. Unfortunately, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) or MS" detectors for GC are still not widely used in official laboratories, and therefore these techniques are not always accepted for enforcement methods. 

All previous discussion has focused on sample preparation, i.e., removal of the targeted analyte(s) from the sample matrix, isolation of the analyte(s) from other co-extracted, undesirable sample components, and transfer of the analytes into a solvent suitable for final analysis. Over the years, numerous types of analytical instruments have been employed for this final analysis step as noted in the preceding text and Tables 3 and 4. Overall, GC and LC are the most often used analytical techniques, and modern GC and LC instrumentation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection systems are currently the analytical techniques of choice. Methods relying on spectrophotometric detection and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) are now rarely employed, except perhaps for qualitative purposes. 

---