Target analyte

Protein-Pak packings are designed for the size exclusion chromatography of proteins and related compounds. They are based on silica, which is deactivated with glycidylpropylsilane. The diol function prevents the interaction of the target analytes with the silica surface. However, because coverage of the silica surface is always incomplete, residual acidic silanols can interact with the analytes. For this reason, most applications are carried out with a salt concentration above 0.2 mol/liter, which eliminates the interaction of analytes with surface silanols. Protein-Pak packings are stable from pH 2 to pH 8. 

In common with all multidimensional separations, two-dimensional GC has a requirement that target analytes are subjected to two or more mutually independent separation steps and that the components remain separated until completion of the overall procedure. Essentially, the effluent from a primary column is reanalysed by a second column of differing stationary phase selectivity. Since often enhancing the peak capacity of the analytical system is the main goal of the coupling, it is the relationship between the peak capacities of the individual dimensions that is crucial. Giddings (2) outlined the concepts of peak capacity product and it is this function that results in such powerful two-dimensional GC separations. 

Figure 13.5 Schematic presentation of the procedure involved in coupled-column RPLC AS, autosampler C-1 and C-2, first and second separation columns, respectively M-1 and M-2, mobile phases S-1 and S2, interferences A, target analytes HV, high-pressure valve D, detector. Reprinted from Journal of Chromatography, A 703, E. A. Hogendoom and R van Zoonen, Coupled-column reversed-phase liquid cliromatography in environmental analysis , pp. 149-166, copyright 1995, with permission from Elsevier Science.

Our group also demonstrated another combinatorial approach in which a CSP carrying a library of enantiomerically pure potential selectors was used directly to screen for enantioselectivity in the HPLC separation of target analytes [93, 94]. The best selector of the bound mixture for the desired separation was then identified in a few deconvolution steps. As a result of the parallelism advantage , the number of columns that had to be screened in this deconvolution process to identify the single most selective selector CSP was much smaller than the number of actual selectors in the library. 

The objective of controlled-potential electroanalytical experiments is to obtain a current response that is related to the concentration of the target analyte. This objective is accomplished by monitoring the transfer of electrons) during the redox process of the analyte ... 

An electrochemical detector uses the electrochemical properties of target analytes for their determination in a flowing stream. While parameters such as current, potential,... 

Other useful sensors rely on the coupling of microorganisms and electrochemical transducers. Changes in the respiration activity of the microorganism, induced by the target analyte, result in decreased surface concentration of electroactive metabolites (e.g., oxygen), which can be detected by the transducer. 

If compounds other than the target analyte are present, but these do not produce ions at the same m/z value as the analyte of interest, they play no part in the analysis. The selectivity of the detector is therefore enhanced. 

The use of common moiety methods acceptable in exceptional circumstances where there is no other practical means of determining the target analyte, and in these cases, full justification is required. This should include an explanation of why the compound cannot be determined by a specific analytical technique. For existing a.i., common moiety methods are also acceptable, in cases where the residue definition includes a common moiety. Moreover, validation data must be presented separately for all relevant components. 

To select and define the target analytes for the residue analysis of crops in a field trial, applicants should consider metabolites/degradation products of the test materials by conducting plant and animal metabolism studies and by assessing toxicity of the metabolites/degradation products. 

Often solvents do not extract 100% of the total radioactive residue. In this case, knowledge about the concentration of the target analyte(s) in the extract and the filter cake is necessary. Even if large amounts of radioactivity remain in the solid residual materials, the extraction efficiency may be sufficient if this unextracted radioactivity is permanently bound to the matrix or if it is associated with compounds which are not included in the residue definition. Finally, in all cases a well performed metabolism study can provide the answers needed, even where residues in the edible parts of treated crops or animals do not occur. If incurred residues do not occur, clearly the determination of extraction efficiency is not required. 

The workhorses in national monitoring programs are multi-residue methods. Any official method collection of any EU Member State contains at least one multi-residue method. For multi-analyte and/or multi-matrix methods, it is likely to be impractical to validate a method for all possible combinations of analyte, concentration and type of sample matrix that may be encountered in subsequent use of the method. Therefore, initial validation should incorporate as many of the target analytes and matrices as practicable. For practical reasons this validation and the evaluation of other methods with limited scope often cannot be conducted in inter-laboratory studies. Other concepts based on independent laboratory validation or validation in a single laboratory have been developed and can provide a practical and cost-effective alternative (or intermediate) approach. 

The extent of cleanup needed depends on the target analyte, the quality of the sample extract, the method of detection and sensitivity. Liquid-liquid partition (LLP) and solid-phase extraction (SPE) columns such as the Cig cartridge and macroporous diatomaceous column are the cleanup method of choice. 

Immunosorbents have also found applicability in on-line SPE analysis. An antibody is immobilized on to a silica support and used as an affinity ligand to retain targeted analytes. Components not recognized by the antibody are not retained and some degree of selectivity is attained. Recoveries of 87-103% were obtained for atrazine, simazine, DEA, propazine, and terbuthylazine at the 0.2 xgL concentration level when using immunosorbent SPE (80 mg silica and 2 mg anti-atrazine and anti-chlortoluron antibodies) on-line with LC/APcI-MS however, this method is not applicable to DIA (0% recovery). This compound may be better retained when using an... 

All previous discussion has focused on sample preparation, i.e., removal of the targeted analyte(s) from the sample matrix, isolation of the analyte(s) from other co-extracted, undesirable sample components, and transfer of the analytes into a solvent suitable for final analysis. Over the years, numerous types of analytical instruments have been employed for this final analysis step as noted in the preceding text and Tables 3 and 4. Overall, GC and LC are the most often used analytical techniques, and modern GC and LC instrumentation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection systems are currently the analytical techniques of choice. Methods relying on spectrophotometric detection and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) are now rarely employed, except perhaps for qualitative purposes. 

The major metabolite of pyraflufen-ethyl in plants and soils is E-1 (ester hydrolysate). E-2 (phenol derivative) and E-3 (methylated E-2) are also detected as major metabolites in soils. The target analytes are considered to be pyraflufen-ethyl at least in plant materials, pyraflufen-ethyl, E-1, E-2 and E-3 in soils and pyraflufen-ethyl and E-1 in water samples. 

---