Organic sampling

Spectrometric Analysis. Remarkable developments ia mass spectrometry (ms) and nuclear magnetic resonance methods (nmr), eg, secondary ion mass spectrometry (sims), plasma desorption (pd), thermospray (tsp), two or three dimensional nmr, high resolution nmr of soHds, give useful stmcture analysis information (131). Because nmr analysis of or N-labeled amino acids enables determiaation of amino acids without isolation from organic samples, and without destroyiag the sample, amino acid metaboHsm can be dynamically analy2ed (132). Proteia metaboHsm and biosynthesis of many important metaboUtes have been studied by this method. Preparative methods for labeled compounds have been reviewed (133). 

ISO International Organization for Standardization VO ST Volatile organic sampling train... 

Semivolatile Organics Sampling EPA Method 0010 as contained in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, 3d ed., Report No. 

In some ways, it s surprising that carbon NMR is even possible. After all, 12Q the most abundant carbon isotope, has no nuclear spin and can t be seen b> NMR. Carbon-13 is the only naturally occurring carbon isotope with a nucleai spin, but its natural abundance is only 1.1%. Thus, only about 1 of ever) 100 carbons in an organic sample is observable by NMR. The problem of low abundance has been overcome, however, by the use of signal averaging anc Fourier-transfonn NMR (FT-NMR). Signal averaging increases instrument sensitivity, and FT-NMR increases instrument speed. 

The costs involved are much smaller than for traditional research. This applies not only to direct financial aspects, but also to requirements in terms of human resources, and to ethical matters related, for example, to the origin of wet tissue or organ samples. 

Flg ire 8.29 Apparatus for siunpling airborne organic samples. A, trapping of organic volatiles in air using a sorbent trap B, thermal desorption chamber C, high-volume sampler for air particulates. 

Sample preparation for the common desorption/ionisation (DI) methods varies greatly. Films of solid inorganic or organic samples may be analysed with DI mass spectrometry, but sample preparation as a solution for LSIMS and FAB is far more common. The sample molecules are dissolved in a low-vapour-pressure liquid solvent - usually glycerol or nitrobenzyl alcohol. Other solvents have also been used for more specialised applications. Key requirements for the solvent matrix are sample solubility, low solvent volatility and muted acid - base or redox reactivity. In FAB and LSIMS, the special art of sample preparation in the selection of a solvent matrix, and then manipulation of the mass spectral data afterwards to minimise its contribution, still predominates. Incident particles in FAB and LSIMS are generated in filament ionisation sources or plasma discharge sources. 

Organic samples for qualitative analysis See LASSAIGNE TEST Other reactants Yoshida, 1980, 262-263 MRH values calculated for 19 combinations with various materials are given. ... 

The frequency of multiple residues in the three datasets analyzed by Baker et al. is shown in Table 14.1. The PDP found that about 45% of conventional fruit and vegetable samples tested from 1994-1999 contained residues of two or more pesticides, while 7.1% of organic samples had multiple residues. The average conventional apple tested in this period by PDP contained residues of three different pesticides. In CU testing 62% of conventional samples contained multiple residues, compared to 6% of organic samples. 

Further insight on the frequency of multiple residues is evident in Table 14.4, which shows the number of residues found per sample for selected foods tested in 2004 by the PDP. Conventional apples were found to contain, on average, 3.6 residues, while the one positive organic sample had a very minute level of the post-harvest fungicide thiabendazole. The level of residue found in the one positive organic apple sample was 0.0002 parts per million, while the mean thiabendazole residue found in 641 positive conventional samples was 0.43 ppm, over 2100 times higher than the level found in the organic sample. 

Table 14.5 provides a sense of how frequently the PDP might need to alert the NOP of a violative residue in an organic sample. The table shows all positive samples of fresh organic produce in 2004, the residue level found and the applicable EPA tolerance. The PDP would need to flag any value over one in the column Ratio of residue found to 5% of EPA tolerance ... 

Table 14.5 Overview of organic samples with positive residues PDP 2004... 

Crop-pesticide data pairs Residue level (ppm) EPA tolerance (ppm) Ratio of residue found to 5% of EPA tolerance Mean residue level (all samples) Ratio of residue found in organic samples to mean of all samples... 

The next column reports the mean residue level found in conventional samples and the last column shows the ratio of the residue level in the organic sample compared to the mean of the residues in conventional samples. Residues in this table are ranked in descending order relative to this last column. Any value over about 0.5 in this last column suggests mislabeling, since the residue level in the organic sample was no less than one-half the mean level in all-positive conventional samples. Half to two-thirds of the residues in Table 14.5 are likely reflect mislabeling, while perhaps one-third are likely to be cases of inadvertent drift or cross-contamination. 

Preservation of organic samples is thus still a major problem there is no general, foolproof method applicable to all samples and all methods of analysis. The most generally accepted method of sample preservation is storage under refrigeration in the dark, with a preservative. This is another area that still needs extensive investigation. 

The results show that good recoveries were obtained from artificial seawaters, even at the 0—05 xg/l level, but for natural seawater samples the recoveries were lower (74-85%). This effect could be attributed to organic sample components that eluted from the column together with dimethyl arsinate. 

This chapter focuses on all the information published up to date about total mercury (THg) and organomercury, with special emphasis on methylmercury (MeHg), in different aquatic organisms sampled along the Ebro River. 

---