Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mass sample preparation

Time, Cost, and Equipment Analysis time can vary from several minutes for samples containing only a few constituents to more than an hour for more complex samples. Preliminary sample preparation may substantially increase the analysis time. Instrumentation for gas chromatography ranges in price from inexpensive (a few thousand dollars) to expensive (more than 50,000). The more expensive models are equipped for capillary columns and include a variety of injection options and more sophisticated detectors, such as a mass spectrometer. Packed columns typically cost 50- 200, and the cost of a capillary column is typically 200- 1000. [Pg.578]

Liquids that are sufficiently volatile to be treated as gases (as in GC) are usually not very polar and have little or no hydrogen bonding between molecules. As molecular mass increases and as polar and hydrogen-bonding forces increase, it becomes increasingly difficult to treat a sample as a liquid with inlet systems such as El and chemical ionization (Cl), which require the sample to be in vapor form. Therefore, there is a transition from volatile to nonvolatile liquids, and different inlet systems may be needed. At this point, LC begins to become important for sample preparation and connection to a mass spectrometer. [Pg.279]

Before sample preparation, the laboratory must demonstrate that the mass spectrometer is operating satisfactorily. First, the instrument must be tuned by calibration using one of two compounds. [Pg.296]

Gold is a useflil caUbration standard for this method (see Radioactive tracers). Whereas similar sensitivities can be achieved by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (qv), the latter requires more extensive sample preparation to overcome interference by other metals such as copper (64). [Pg.381]

The very low Hg concentration levels in ice core of remote glaciers require an ultra-sensitive analytical technique as well as a contamination-free sample preparation methodology. The potential of two analytical techniques for Hg determination - cold vapour inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CV ICP-SFMS) and atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) with gold amalgamation was studied. [Pg.171]

The complex of the following destmctive and nondestmctive analytical methods was used for studying the composition of sponges inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). Techniques of sample preparation were developed for each method and their metrological characteristics were defined. Relative standard deviations for all the elements did not exceed 0.25 within detection limit. The accuracy of techniques elaborated was checked with the method of additions and control methods of analysis. [Pg.223]

GLC yield is based on thermal conductivity corrections reladve to an appropriate internal standard. Product identity was confirmed by comparison of F NMR, H NMR, IR, and/or mass spectra with those of authentic samples prepared by alternative routes when possible Yields are based on ylide Isolated yields are given m parentheses. [Pg.585]

I. Fener, V. Pichon, M-C. Hennion and D. Barcelo, Automated sample preparation with exti action columns by means of anti-isoproturon immunosorbents foi the determination of phenylurea herbicides in water followed by liquid chi omatography-diode aixay detection and liquid cliromatogi aphy-atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometiy , 7. Chromatogr. 777 91-98 (1997). [Pg.132]

K. Ki onkvist, M. Gustavsson, A.-K. Wendel and H. Jaegfeldt, Automated sample preparation foi the determination of budesonide in plasma samples by liquid chi omatography and tandem mass specti ometi y , 7. Chromatogr. A 823 401-409 (1998). [Pg.296]

In order to reduce or eliminate off-line sample preparation, multidimensional chromatographic techniques have been employed in these difficult analyses. LC-GC has been employed in numerous applications that involve the analysis of poisonous compounds or metabolites from biological matrices such as fats and tissues, while GC-GC has been employed for complex samples, such as arson propellants and for samples in which special selectivity, such as chiral recognition, is required. Other techniques include on-line sample preparation methods, such as supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)-GC and LC-GC-GC. In many of these applications, the chromatographic method is coupled to mass spectrometry or another spectrometiic detector for final confirmation of the analyte identity, as required by many courts of law. [Pg.407]

Brain et al. [137] reported a tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) procedure by which a direct measurement from an n-pentane extract of a surfactant is possible. This procedure is excellent from the standpoint of sensitivity and simplicity of sample preparation but is not commonly applied because of the need of an MS-MS instrument. [Pg.448]

State-of-the-art TOF-SIMS instruments feature surface sensitivities well below one ppm of a mono layer, mass resolutions well above 10,000, mass accuracies in the ppm range, and lateral and depth resolutions below 100 nm and 1 nm, respectively. They can be applied to a wide variety of materials, all kinds of sample geometries, and to both conductors and insulators without requiring any sample preparation or pretreatment. TOF-SIMS combines high lateral and depth resolution with the extreme sensitivity and variety of information supplied by mass spectrometry (all elements, isotopes, molecules). This combination makes TOF-SIMS a unique technique for surface and thin film analysis, supplying information which is inaccessible by any other surface analytical technique, for example EDX, AES, or XPS. [Pg.33]

Several methods are available for the analysis of trichloroethylene in biological media. The method of choice depends on the nature of the sample matrix cost of analysis required precision, accuracy, and detection limit and turnaround time of the method. The main analytical method used to analyze for the presence of trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroethanol and TCA, in biological samples is separation by gas chromatography (GC) combined with detection by mass spectrometry (MS) or electron capture detection (ECD). Trichloroethylene and/or its metabolites have been detected in exhaled air, blood, urine, breast milk, and tissues. Details on sample preparation, analytical method, and sensitivity and accuracy of selected methods are provided in Table 6-1. [Pg.229]

Frankenberger, Jr., and Muhammad Arshad Handbook of Weed Management Systems, edited by Albert E. Smith Soil Sampling, Preparation, and Analysis, Kim H. Tan Soil Erosion, Conservation, and Rehabilitation, edited by Menachem Agassi Plant Roots The Hidden Half, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, edited by Yoav Waisel, Amram Eshel, and Uzi Kafkafi Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops Source-Sink Relationships, edited by Eli Zamski and Arthur A. Schaffer Mass Spectrometry of Soils, edited by Thomas W. Boutton and Shinichi Yamasaki... [Pg.430]

Particularly for thin Mossbauer absorbers with a low concentration of the resonance nuclide and high mass absorption, it may be problematic to apply the recommendation for sample preparation (f 0.2), because the resulting electronic absorption may be prohibitively high. In such a case, it may pay well to optimize the absorber thickness, i.e., the area density f. To this end, following the approach of Long et al. [33], we adopt the general expression ... [Pg.49]

All previous discussion has focused on sample preparation, i.e., removal of the targeted analyte(s) from the sample matrix, isolation of the analyte(s) from other co-extracted, undesirable sample components, and transfer of the analytes into a solvent suitable for final analysis. Over the years, numerous types of analytical instruments have been employed for this final analysis step as noted in the preceding text and Tables 3 and 4. Overall, GC and LC are the most often used analytical techniques, and modern GC and LC instrumentation coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection systems are currently the analytical techniques of choice. Methods relying on spectrophotometric detection and thin-layer chromatography (TLC) are now rarely employed, except perhaps for qualitative purposes. [Pg.439]

Specifically for triazines in water, multi-residue methods incorporating SPE and LC/MS/MS will soon be available that are capable of measuring numerous parent compounds and all their relevant degradates (including the hydroxytriazines) in one analysis. Continued increases in liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/API-MS/MS) sensitivity will lead to methods requiring no aqueous sample preparation at all, and portions of water samples will be injected directly into the LC column. The use of SPE and GC or LC coupled with MS and MS/MS systems will also be applied routinely to the analysis of more complex sample matrices such as soil and crop and animal tissues. However, the analyte(s) must first be removed from the sample matrix, and additional research is needed to develop more efficient extraction procedures. Increased selectivity during extraction also simplifies the sample purification requirements prior to injection. Certainly, miniaturization of all aspects of the analysis (sample extraction, purification, and instrumentation) will continue, and some of this may involve SEE, subcritical and microwave extraction, sonication, others or even combinations of these techniques for the initial isolation of the analyte(s) from the bulk of the sample matrix. [Pg.445]

The need to understand the fate of pesticides in the environment has necessitated the development of analytical methods for the determination of residues in environmental media. Adoption of methods utilizing instrumentation such as gas chro-matography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has allowed the detection of minute amounts of pesticides and their degradation products in environmental samples. Sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have also been important in the development of more reliable and sensitive analytical methods. [Pg.605]

The development of a robust analytical method is a complex issue. The residue analyst has available a vast array of techniques to assist in this task, but there are a number of basic rules that should be followed to produce a reliable method. The intention of this article is to provide the analyst with ideas from which a method can be constructed by considering each major component of the analytical method (sample preparation, extraction, sample cleanup, and the determinative step), and to suggest modern techniques that can be used to develop an effective and efficient overall approach. The latter portion emphasizes mass spectrometry (MS) since the current trend for pesticide residue methods is leading to MS becoming the method of choice for simultaneous quantitation and confirmation. This article also serves to update previous publications on similar topics by the authors. ... [Pg.753]

In most alpha and mass spectrometric methods for which sample preparation is extensive and chemical recoveries can vary considerably from sample to sample, precise elemental concentrations are determined by isotope dilution methods (e.g., Faure 1977). This method is based on the determination of the isotopic composition of an element in a mixture of a known quantity of a tracer with an unknown quantity of the normal element. The tracer is a solution containing a known concentration of a particular element or elements for which isotopic composition has been changed by enrichment of one or more of its isotopes. [Pg.26]


See other pages where Mass sample preparation is mentioned: [Pg.198]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.378]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.1029]    [Pg.1030]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.724]    [Pg.818]    [Pg.904]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.437 ]




SEARCH



Accelerator mass spectrometry sample preparation

Desorption-chemical ionization mass sample preparation

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry sample preparation

Glow discharge mass spectrometry sample preparation

Imaging mass spectrometry sample preparation

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry sample preparation

Isotope ratio mass spectrometry sample preparation

Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass sample preparation

Laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry sample preparation

Liquid chromatography/mass sample preparation method

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry sample preparation

MASS PREPARATION

Mass spectrometry sample preparation

Mass spectroscopy sample preparation

Peptide mass mapping sample preparation

Preparative chromatography sample mass overload

Sample mass

Spark source mass sample preparation

Spark source mass spectrometry sample preparation

Tandem mass spectrometry Sample preparation

© 2024 chempedia.info