Sample Preparation Methodologies

Although chromatography is a separating technique it can not be expected to completely separate all components of a complex sample. Very often it is necessary to prepare the sample, filtrate, concentrate, clean up, etc. before chromatography. These steps vary depending on the nature of the sample. In this section a brief but recent view of these techniques is shown together with some specific applications to environmental analysis. 

An alternative to normal filtration is ultrafiltration. In this case, pressure is applied to a membrane and molecules smaller than the molecular weight cutoff can pass through while larger molecules are retained. Ultrafiltration can be used for sample concentration or to eliminate higher molecular weight compounds. 

Depending on the nature of analyte(s) of interest, sample preparation processes will be quite different. In liquid sample preparation, as for water and wastewater analysis, the analytes from matrices can be separated in two different ways  

The classical LLE method is still in use due to the simplicity of the instrumentation, just a separation funnel, and also because of its extensive implementation in official methods (U.S.-EPA methodology, EEC standard methods). As shown in Table 2.1 nearly all U.S.-EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) methods for nonvolatile and semivolatile analytes in environmental samples apply LLE even though there is a trend to change this. 

Membrane LLE (MLLE) or sorptive membrane extraction (SME) is an alternative to LLE, and is an extension of the LLE principles. A membrane is used as a selective filter of the analytes, limiting diffusion between two solutions or as an active membrane in which its chemical 

---

The very low Hg concentration levels in ice core of remote glaciers require an ultra-sensitive analytical technique as well as a contamination-free sample preparation methodology. The potential of two analytical techniques for Hg determination - cold vapour inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (CV ICP-SFMS) and atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS) with gold amalgamation was studied. 

We have carried out an extensive literature search on sample preparation technologies and found many papers on conventional chromatography and capillary electrophoresis methods but few on NLC and NCE. It is important to mention here that sample preparation methodologies used in conventional chromatography and capillary electrophoresis can be used in NLC and NCE. The interested reader can consult our earlier books for details [20,21], However, attempts have been made to describe sample preparation protocols required in NLC and NCE techniques. Some of the important requirements and preparations are discussed below. 

The choice of sample preparation method is crucial in chemical analysis because it is often the most critical and time-consuming step of an analytical process.35 There is a wide choice of methods for sample pretreatment and preparation for further analysis. Unfortunately, however, there are no universal methods of sample treatment because analytical samples come in a huge variety of forms. Ideally, the sample preparation methodology should be solvent-free, simple, inexpensive, efficient, selective, and compatible with final analytical methods. 

The sample preparation methodology for the determination of TCDD at these low levels is an active area of development as indicated by the improved procedure reported here and used to analyze the milk for the NIEHS study. It uses reagent modified adsorbants, a higher efficiency basic alumina column than previously (19) and a new degree of separation, reverse phase HPLC as an integral part of the procedure. All of these are directed towards improving the specificity of the sample preparation for 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Increased specificity is needed since the lowest detection limit achievable in all previous studies of TCDD in environmental samples has been dictated by the presence of other substances in the samples which have not been removed by the sample preparation. 

Matusiewicz, H. Review of sample preparation methodology for elemental analysis of cellulose type materials. ICP Inf. Newsl. 25, 510-514 (1999)... 

The analysis of CAD and alkamides has been completed using a variety of analytical techniques that include high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis, gas chromatography (GC), GC-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Sample preparation methodologies utilize hexane, methanol and ethanol as the primary extraction solvents. 

The quality of the results obtained in a MSI experiment are intrinsically related to the sample preparation methodology, which in turn is highly... 

There are a number of assays within the profiling suite that require quantitation of the compound by LC-MS. The nature of the incubation and sample preparation methodologies of these assays may have considerable variation, but the analytical LC-MS determination is essentially the same. By using the same column type and mobile phase as the SI assay, the compounds can be expected to behave in the same fashion from both a chromatographic and MS standpoint. Typically, the column is shortened to 2 x 20 mm and the gradient time is reduced to provide a I 1.5-niinulc sample-to-sample turnaround. 

The distinctions within the drug-discovery environment previously noted naturally favor the use of simpler and faster sample-preparation techniques. However, most all sample-preparation methods are potentially viable choices, as recent applications have demonstrated method-development techniques that are both rapid and selective. Also, there is value for the quick development of a bioanalytical method with selectivity for a series of similarly related structures, as that one method can often meet the needs for PK and toxicokinetic (TK) studies well into the discovery process, rather than just for one initial study. The variety of sample-preparation methodologies for bioanalysis are now detailed. 

The selection of sample preparation methodology is highly dependent on both analyte and sample (matrix) characteristics. To approach the matrices in the same cost-effective ( multi ) way as analytes, food, commodities, and in relation to that also sample preparation methods, are primarily classified based on the fat content the limit between fatty and nonfatty food matrices being usually set at 2%. 

Selection of sample preparation methodologies (Section 4.3) must obviously take into account the chemical nature and properties of anal54e and matrix, but also the possibility of related compounds (metabolites, breakdown products etc.) and unrelated matrix constituents that could lead to matrix effects in the analytical step (Sections 5.3.6a and 9.6). These considerations affect the extent of necessary clean-up procedures following extraction, but of course the situation is complicated by the role of the analytical chromatography in possibly resolving... 

Several of the methods mentioned earlier for the determination of the uranium content in soil are also suitable for assaying the uranium content in plants. However, there are two major differences the uranium concentration in plants is usually significantly lower than in soil and the fraction of organic matter and the moisture content in plants are much higher than in soil. These two factors dictate somewhat different sample preparation methodologies and more sensitive analytical devices are preferred as shown in the following examples. Some of the review articles mentioned earlier also discuss the uramum content, uptake (transfer factor), and distribution in plants (Zavodska et al. 2008 Mitchell et al. 2013). One of the most comprehensive sources listing the uranium content in many different types of plants is the Canadian report mentioned earlier (Environment 2007). An additional important source can be found in the report published by the IAEA (IAEA 2010). 

Bulk chemical composition was determined by X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) and carbon-sulphur analyses to (i) define the best sample preparation methodology for Po analysis by alpha spectrometry and (ii) estimate the matrix attenuation effect of 46.5 keV gamma photon emissions from Pb by gamma spectrometry using theoretical elemental mass attenuation coefficients from the literature [4],... 

In general, sunscreen cosmetics do not require complex sample preparation methodologies, since solubilization of the most common preparations (i.e. creams, lotions, milks, waters or oils) is usually easy, by means of mixing them with the appropriate solvent, which also needs to solubilize the target analytes. 

Improved Sample Preparation Methodology on Lime Mortar for Reliable Dating... 

---