Protective disinfectants

The U.S. Pubhc Health Service undertook a comprehensive survey of water supplies in the United States, known as the Community Water Supply Study (CWSS). Released in 1970, the study found that 41% of the systems surveyed did not meet the 1962 standards. Many systems were deficient with respect to various aspects of source protection, disinfection, clarification, and pressure in the distribution system. The study also showed that, although the water served to the majority of the U.S. population was safe, about 360,000 people were being supphed with potentially dangerous drinking water. 

Includes finger protection, disinfection of bite site, avoid puncturing tick body... 

Environmental Toxic to fish nontoxic to bees Precaution Combustible can form explosive mixts. with air > 89 C Hazardous Decomp. Prods. CO, CO2, SO, CS2 Uses Vulcanizing agent, accelerator for rubber preservative for natural rubber latex fungicide insecticide seed protectant/disinfectant animal repellent antioxidant for polyolefins lube oil additive in food-pkg. adhesives accelerator for food-contact rubber articles for repeated use antiseptic antibacterial, antifungal for topical pharmaceuticals Regulatory FDA 21CFR 175.105,177.2600 SARA reportable Manuf./Distrib. Aldrich Atofina Agri Complex Ouimica SA FMC Foret ... 

Uses Vulcanizing agent, accelerator for rubber preservative for natural rubber latex fungicide insecticide seed protectant/disinfectant animal repellent antioxidant for polyolefins lube oil additive in food-pkg. adhesives accelerator for food-contact rubber articles for repeated use antiseptic antibacterial, antifungal for topical pharmaceuticals... 

Crop Protection, insects and weeds in fields, gardens, greenhouses, nurseries Disinfection, bacteria in homes, hospitals, on medical and dental equipment... 

Year Intermediate chemicals Protective coatings Soaps and disinfectants Flotation Other uses... 

Tuberculocidal Test. The tubercle bacillus is resistant to disinfectants because the cells are protected with a waxy coating that is not readily penetrated. The tuberculocidal test is a use dilution practical type test that employs porcelain cylinders. The bacteria are different from those in the use dilution method (Table 10), the incubation time is longer, and the details of the procedure are different. For example, in the tuberculocidal test the test is divided into two parts, a presumptive test and a confirmatory test. The former employs Mycobacterium smegmatis and the latter employs Mycobacterium bovis (BCG). For the presumptive test the incubation time is 12 days, as against 48 hours for other bacteria used in the use-dilution method. For the confirmatory test the incubation time is 60 days, with an additional 30 days in case there is no growth. As shown in Table 10, the concentrations of the phenol standard are higher than used with other bacteria. 

Operations involving infectious agents or organisms will require further measures to ensure bio-security and safety. This usually involves the use of biosafety cabinets, which are designed to protect both the product and the user from contamination. Appropriate disinfection and bio-containment procedures must be adopted to prevent unwanted release of dangerous organisms. 

The complex outer layers beyond the peptidoglycan in the Gram-negative species, the outer membrane, protect the organism to a certain extent from the action of toxic chemicals (see Chapter 13). Thus, disinfectants are often effective only at concentrations higher than those affecting Gram-positive cells and these layers provide unique protection to the cells from the action of benzylpenicillin and lysozyme. 

The optimum wavelength for UV sterilization is around 260 nm. A suitable source for UV light in this region is a mercury lamp giving peak emission levels at 254 nm. These sources are generally wall- or ceiling-mounted for air disinfection, or fixed to vessels for water treatment. Operators present in an irradiated room should wear appropriate protective clothing and eye shields. 

Lower chemical reactivity with non-target molecules is useful for another performance-related reason. Microorganisms prefer the protection and luxuriant environment in biofilms (the adherent microbial communities that cause detrimental surface-fouling effects in water cooling systems). Most (>99%) of the viable microorganisms in industrial systems are found in biofilms, not floating around freely in the bulk recirculating water. Compared to unstabilized chlorine or bromine, STABREX more effectively removes and disinfects biofilms as shown in Table 6. 

The use of AAAs as feed supplements appears an attractive approach either in itself or in combination with pro-, pre- and synbiotics, but the lack of animal feeding studies in which the efficacy of this approach could be determined makes it difficult to assess to what extent a two-barrier (targeting control at both the stomach and intestinal level) approach is commercially feasible. Also, since the viability of probiotics may also be affected by the use of AAA to increase the disinfection activity of the stomach, probiotics may need to be formulated in a way that protects them during stomach transfer. However, its potential should be determined in future research. 

Beuchat, L.R. (1999) Survival of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli 0157 H7 in bovine feces applied to lettuce and the effectiveness of chlorinated water as a disinfectant . Journal of Food Protection, 62, 845-849. 

Delaquis, P.J., Sholberg, PL. and Stanich, K. (1999) Disinfection of mung bean seed with gaseous acetic acid . Journal of Food Protection, 62, 953-957. 

Triorganotins Agrochemical fungicides, herbicides, miticides, insecticides, nematocides, acaracides, antifeedants biocide in marine paints slimicide in paper pulp mills and cooling towers rodent repellent molluscicides wood preservative fungicides disinfectants stone preservation textile, paper, and leather protection (Piver 1973 Hunter 1976 Kumpulainen and Koivistoinen 1977 CEC 1978 WHO 1980 Davies and Smith 1982 Chau etal. 1984 Subramanian 1984 Wilkinson 1984 Blunden etal. 1985 Maguire and Tkacz 1985 Thompson etal. 1985 Blunden and Chapman 1986 USPHS 1992). 

Sometimes in the design of a BSL-4 facility, the full letter of health and safety codes/requirements for the protection of workers can not be met. This is where health and safety specialists must compromise and use their ingenuity to meet the intent of the requirements. For example, it is not always possible to provide a secondary means of egress from each area. Two change facilities are not cost effective or practical. A viable alternative is the use of airlocks with built-in liquid disinfection systems which are not hazardous to humans, but destroy the biohazard. These airlocks must be clearly identified as others are often used for transportation of equipment and other materials and contain hazardous disinfection systems. 

Decontamination Soap and water, or diluted sodium hypochlorite solution (0.5 percent). Removal of potentially contaminated clothing should be done by people in full protective clothing in an area away from non-contaminated persons. For victims with bubonic plague, drainage, and secretion procedures need to be employed. Careful treatment of buboes is required to avoid aerosolizing infectious material. For victims with pneumonic plague, strict isolation is absolutely necessary. Heat, disinfectants and sunlight renders bacteria harmless. 

For those VHF viruses that can be transmitted from one victim to another person, response and medical personnel should avoid close physical contact with the victim and his or her body fluids. Barrier nursing or infection control techniques include isolating infected persons, wearing protective clothing, disinfection, and disposal of instruments and equipment used for the treatment of VHF, including needles and thermometers. Special Precautions are a must do factor when responding to or caring for viral hemor-... 

CEFIC has estimated that more than 60% of the 2,000 biocidal active ingredients and of the 20,000 formulated biocidal products containing them currently marketed in the EU may eventually be withdrawn as a result of the implementation of the Biocidal Products Directive. Avecia believes the BPD is likely to restrict new product development and increase the costs of notifying and listing active substances, meaning that research on new actives will be difficult to justify. Avecia Protection Hygiene develops and produces antimicrobials for more than 25 applications in industrial preservation, disinfection, plastics, textiles and personal care, and it continues to develop new products. 

The new Biocidal Products Directive is examined, which closes the gap in European legislation for products such as disinfectants and anti-foulants where there has not, until now, been a Europe-wide standard. The basic goals of the directive are to simplify and harmonise Europe s regulatory framework for biocides, and to remove trade barriers within the EU, and to improve the protection of both human health and the environment. The new directive must be enforced as national legislation in all member countries by 14 May 2000. Details are given of products defined within the directive, and ways in which the directive will be put into practice in the UK are discussed. The implications of the legislation on the industry in terms of time and money spent on testing for each active substance involved are examined. 

---