Project Implementation Plan

To exhibit professional ethics by getting approval of their project implementation plan and ensuring that problem identified and solutions built by each team is unique (criteria - i and f)... 

The term PP is used in this book because it is preferred by the PMI, the gold standard of project management professional societies. However, other names include project delivery plan, project execution plan, project implementation plan, project management plan, project operations plan, project work plan, task plan, and technical operating plan. What we call it is not important preparing and using it is. 

Develop Project Implementation plan If the project is selected to proceed, the team selects a project implementation leader who helps determine the schedule, process, resource requirements, and distribution of responsibilities for completion. 

Accountants, administrators, agricultural commissioners, air monitoring, supervisors, coordinators (environmental health project, grants, quality assurance, special project and state implementation plan), grants analysts, officers (enforcement, hearings, staff services, technical services and training), supervisors, and technical advisors. 

China SEP A, 2003. Building the Capacity of the People s Republic of China to implement the Stockholm Convention on POPs and develop a National Implementation Plan. GEF Project Brief (GF/CPR/02/010). 

The next phases are detailed planning of restoration measures, planning of project assessment and project implementation. The final phase, utilization, includes maintenance measures, evaluation of project success, adaptive management and the communication of results. Throughout all phases of the project, the general political and societal framework conditions are taken into account. In short, project managers must deal with complex processes and consider the contextual analysis [7]. 

The presentation phase The VIP team formally presents the profitability recommendations consistent with the objectives and constraints of the workshop and their implementation plans to the steering committee or the project management team. The steering committee then approves those recommendations that pass muster and authorizes the project team to begin the implementation effort. Often, this approval is conditional on early validation by subject matter experts within the project owner s organization, but not present within the workshop. This external feasibility check is meant to provide support to the project team for any additional resources and schedule time needed to fully incorporate the improvements into the project scope of work. 

Instruments to be used in a GMP environment have to be validated prior to regular use. It is useful to develop the instrument implementation plan as a plan to outline the steps necessary to validate the instrument and to support the use of the instrument through its functional life in the laboratories. The implementation plan should highlight the activities in the validation of the system and will be the guiding document of the project. Typically, the validation plan includes ... 

The Western Arctic Shelf-Basin Interactions (SBI) project, sponsored by the ARCSS Program and the U.S. Office of Naval Research, is investigating the Arctic marine ecosystem to improve our capacity to predict environmental change. The SBI Phase II Field Implementation Plan (2002-2006) (Grebmeier et al., 2001) focuses on three research topics in the core study area ... 

Grebmeier J.M. Whitledge T.E. Aagaard K. Bergmann M. Carmack E.C. Codispoti L.A. Darby D. Dunton K.H. Melnikov I.A. Moore S. Takizawa T. Walsh J.J. Wassman P. and Wheeler P. (eds.) (2001). Arctic System Science Ocean-Atmosphere-Ice Interactions Western Arctic Shelf-Basin Interactions (SBI). Phase II Field Implementation Plan, SBI Project Office, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 30 pp. 

Needless to say, these were stretch targets. Nevertheless, in four months, the project teams came up with 430 projects that made it possible to meet the aspiration. A total of 45 of these projects were A projects, which were to deliver 60 percent of the improvement. Implementation plans for A projects were very detailed with clear activities and milestones, as well as monthly resource plans and impact by activity. For the less important B and C projects, there were simpler planning requirements. 

To complete the planning phase, the project team will develop a series of documents that summarize the outcome of the DQO process and describe the planned field operations. The SAP, prepared to address all of the data collection requirements, will establish the performance standards for the project implementation and assessment phases. The planned field operations may be documented in the Work Plan other planning documents may include the Health and Safety Plan, the Contractor QC Plan, and the Environmental Protection Plan. 

However, not every environmental project requires a comprehensive and elaborate planning document. Usually the contents and the format of the SAP are determined by such factors as contractual requirements, regulatory agency oversight, or by financial constraints. A smaller document that contains the most essential SAP elements in combination with the Laboratory QA Manual may be as functional as a full-scale SAP. Appendix 7 presents an example of a SAP table of contents. A SAP prepared in this format is a very effective document that communicates the information essential for project implementation and assessment phases without being overloaded with information available from other sources. 

Project implementation cannot be carried out without planning and it can be only as good as the planning itself. Only thorough and systematic planning provides a firm foundation for successful implementation. Poor planning typically leads to ineffectual implementation, which in turn does not produce the data of the type, quality and quantity required for reliable decision-making. 

Changes are proposed, documented, requested, evaluated, approved, and tested prior to implementation. The quality unit should be responsible for managing both the entire process and all corresponding documentation associated with the change. Change control typically begins at an SDLC milestone defined in a project validation plan. The CRS should at least be fully designed, documented, validatable, and implementable. 

Computerized Information System. The Project SEARCH Criminalistics Laboratory Information System (CLIS) Committee is another LEAA funded project. Approximately fifteen criminalists are serving on the CLIS Committee which is conducting a requirements analysis for a nationwide computerized crime laboratory information system. With the assistance of a technical subcontractor, PRC Public Management Services, Inc., the committee has determined the "user needs" for such a data system, a conceptual design of a computer system to meet these requirements, and an assessment of different organizational and equipment alternatives for the system. The most recent task reports and implementation plan have been completed and submitted to the advisory committee for final review. Copies of the final reports should be ready for dissemination in the very near future. 

The implementation plan prepared by the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism proposed that an interim expert group will be appointed by the Minister of the National Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism to assess project proposals and bioprospecting applications and review requests for access. It is too early to make any comment on whether the review process is working because the procedures are not yet fully operational. There is no indication in the regulations as to how long the assessment of the application may take, especially as the applicant may be required to conduct a risk assessment. 

Pharmaceutical and healthcare companies may consider conducting predelivery checks on their suppliers to verify that Supplier Project/Quality Plans have been implemented. Computer systems should not be accepted at their user sites if outstanding and agreed issues from the Supplier Audit have not been resolved to the satisfaction of the pharmaceutical or healthcare company. 

Figure 2 summarizes the basic difference between the 1975 national stationary source demand for low sulfur coal and oil, based on State Implementation Plan (SIP) estimates of that necessary to achieve primary ambient air quality standards and the projected 1975 supply of these fuels (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). The net result is a forecast coal/oil supply deficit on the basis of sulfur content and including foreign imports, of approximately 8 XlO Btu. This is equivalent to a combined annual shortage of about 230 million tons of coal and 300 million barrels of primarily residual oil. Table II shows the regional distribution of these shortages. In the judgment of the author, uncertainties in factors such as sulfur content analyses, production potentials, and the commercial impact of environmental standards by 1975 limit the accuracy of these supply deficit forecasts to about 20%. 

Create preliminary implementation plan Seciii e approval for implementation Justify projects and secure funding Install necessary equipment Implement procedure... 

---