Polyurethane butyl methacrylate

PB PBI PBMA PBO PBT(H) PBTP PC PCHMA PCTFE PDAP PDMS PE PEHD PELD PEMD PEC PEEK PEG PEI PEK PEN PEO PES PET PF PI PIB PMA PMMA PMI PMP POB POM PP PPE PPP PPPE PPQ PPS PPSU PS PSU PTFE PTMT PU PUR Poly(n.butylene) Poly(benzimidazole) Poly(n.butyl methacrylate) Poly(benzoxazole) Poly(benzthiazole) Poly(butylene glycol terephthalate) Polycarbonate Poly(cyclohexyl methacrylate) Poly(chloro-trifluoro ethylene) Poly(diallyl phthalate) Poly(dimethyl siloxane) Polyethylene High density polyethylene Low density polyethylene Medium density polyethylene Chlorinated polyethylene Poly-ether-ether ketone poly(ethylene glycol) Poly-ether-imide Poly-ether ketone Poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate) Poly(ethylene oxide) Poly-ether sulfone Poly(ethylene terephthalate) Phenol formaldehyde resin Polyimide Polyisobutylene Poly(methyl acrylate) Poly(methyl methacrylate) Poly(methacryl imide) Poly(methylpentene) Poly(hydroxy-benzoate) Polyoxymethylene = polyacetal = polyformaldehyde Polypropylene Poly (2,6-dimethyl-l,4-phenylene ether) = Poly(phenylene oxide) Polyp araphenylene Poly(2,6-diphenyl-l,4-phenylene ether) Poly(phenyl quinoxaline) Polyphenylene sulfide, polysulfide Polyphenylene sulfone Polystyrene Polysulfone Poly(tetrafluoroethylene) Poly(tetramethylene terephthalate) Polyurethane Polyurethane rubber... 

In SIN formation, both timing and rates of polymerization to form the two networks are important. With an acrylate-epoxy system, it was found that simultaneous gelation produced materials with poorer properties than those formed by slightly mismatched polymerization rates (6). In another instance (7), polyurethane-poly(n-butyl methacrylate) SINs in which the acrylate was initiated photolytically at various times after the onset of polyurethane formation produced a series of materials, presumably with the same chemical composition, with an average particle size that decreased as the delay time to acrylic initiation increased. Damping properties of these materials changed systematically across the series. 

A polyurethane (PU)/poly(n-butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) system has been selected for an investigation of the process of phase separation in immiscible polymer mixtures. Within this system, studies are made of the XX, lx, xl, and the 11 forms. In recognition of the incompatibility of PBMA with even the oligomeric soft segment precursor of the PU, no attempt was made to equalize the rates of formation of the component linear and network polymers. Rather, a slow PU formation process is conducted at room temperature in the presence of the PBMA precursors. At suitable times, a relatively rapid photopolymerization of the PBMA precursors is carried out in the medium of the slowly polymerizing PU. The expected result is a series of polymer mixtures essentially identical in component composition and differing experimentally only in the time between the onset of PU formation and the photoinitiation of the acrylic. This report focuses on the dynamic mechanical properties cf these materials and the morphologies seen by electron microscopy. 

Materials. The polyurethane precursor materials were Adiprene L-lOO (Uniroyal, Inc.), a poly(oxytetramethylene glycol) capped with toluene diisocyanate, eq. mol. wt. 1030 1,4-butanediol (BD) and 1,1,1-trimethylolpropane (TMP) and, as catalyst, dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL). Acrylic precursors included n-butyl methacrylate (BMA), washed with 10% aq. NaOH to remove inhibitor tetramethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TMGDM) crosslinker and benzoin sec-butyl ether (BBE) as a photosensitizer. These materials were dried appropriately but not otherwise purified. 

It is very clear that if the initiator has hydroxyl groups, and if the termination takes place exclusively by recombination then a polymeric diol is obtained [2, 3], which is ideal for polyurethane. If the termination takes place by disproportionation, only monofunctional compounds are obtained, which cannot be used in PU. The vinylic and dienic monomers used in practice have various termination mechanisms. Some monomers give only recombination reactions, such as styrene, acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, 2-ethyl hexyl acrylate), acrylonitrile and butadiene. Other monomers give both mechanisms of termination, around 65-75% disproportionation and 25-35% recombination, such as methacrylates (methyl methacrylate, ethyl methacrylate, butyl methacrylate etc.), substituted styrenes and other monomers [2, 3, 4]. 

Hybrid aqueous dispersions were prepared containing both acrylic resins and polyurethane to provide enhanced properties for coating applications. Nanosized (approximately 50 mn) hybrid latexes were prepared at 30 C by the redox-initiated miniemulsion polymerisation of n-butyl methacrylate monomer in the presence of a urethane prepolymer. A stabiliser, of low molecular weight and low water solubility, was required to obtain stable particles of the required size. 7 refs. 

The material employed in this latter study was a copolymer of eight parts of n -butyl methacrylate, one part of ethyl methacrylate, and one part of styrene. The reaction was carried out at 80°C until a prepolymer of syrupy consistency was obtained. As used for SIN formation, various amounts of ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) were added, and mixed with the polyurethane prepolymer. In passing, it should be noted that the portion of acrylic polymerized during the prepolymerization step, sans EGDMA, forms a linear polymer, and apparently does not take part in the network formation. 

Combined MALDI-MS and ion exclusion chromatographic techniques. In most of these techniques described in the literature the MALDI is not directly coupled off-line with the ion exclusion column. An exception is that of the work of Esser and co-workers [281], in which the two units are interfaced via a robotic interface. This technique was applied to studies of PS, PMMA, and butyl(methacrylate-methylmethacrylate) copolymers. Mehl and co-workers [282] combined ion exclusion with MALDI-MS to provide accurate molecular weight determinations on polyether and polyester polyurethane soft blocks. 

Lee I, Kobayashi K, Sun HY, Takatani S, Zhong LG. Biomembrane mimetic polymer poly(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine-co-n-butyl methacrylate) at the interface of polyurethane surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007 82(2) 316-22. 

Figure 6.7. Anamorphoses of kinetic curves of polyurethane formation in presence of 15 wt% of poly(butyl methacrylate) (a - conversion degree).

It is important that the phase separation, in IPNs formed by the same components, depends on the condition of production. It was shown that the introduction, into IPN based on polyurethane, of monomeric or polymeric butyl methacrylate leads to a great difference in the viscoelastic properties, due to dif-... 

The effect of fillers on the reaction of polymer formation was discussed in Chapter 4. It is evident that introducing a filler during IPN formation should also lead to its influence on the rates of the IPN formation. This influence should affect the possibility of microphase separation. This question was studied " for simultaneous semi-lPN based on a crosslinked polyurethane and linear PBMA. The ratio PU PBMA was 3 1, the ratio IPN flller was 60 40 and 80 20 by weight. It was established that the onset of auto-acceleration of the butyl methacrylate polymerization increases from 160 min without filler to 220 min in the presence of a filler (talc). After the onset of auto-acceleration, the reaction rate of butyl methacrylate pol5mierization decreases with the increase of amount of filler. The filler influence on the reaction kinetics was explained based on the so-called... 

The application of AFM to surface morphological studies has been covered in relation to the following polymers polyesters, polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS) [28], polycarbonate, polyimide, polytetrafuoroethylene (PTFE) [29], polyurethane (PU) [30], rubbers [31], polyethylene glycol (PEG) [32], PS and poly(N-butyl-methacrylate) [33], PS [34], PP [35, 36], polyethers [37], polyorthoesters [38], poly(p-phenylene-vinylene) [39], bisphenol A-1, 8-dibromooctane copolymer [40], polycatechol [41], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [42], poly(p-dioxanone)-poly(epsilon caprolactone) [43], poly(L-lactide-polyethylene glycol) [44] and polyvinylidene fluoride [45]. 

Since this pioneering work a number of IPNs have been prepared. Poly(styrene) has been used as the second network polymer in conjunction with several other polymers, including poly(ethyl acrylate), poly(n-butyl acrylate), styrene-butadiene, and castor oil. Polyurethanes have been used to form IPNs with poly(methyl methacrylate), other acrylic polymers, and with epoxy resins. 

PVC can be blended with numerous other polymers to give it better processability and impact resistance. For the manufacture of food contact materials the following polymerizates and/or polymer mixtures from polymers manufactured from the above mentioned starting materials can be used Chlorinated polyolefins blends of styrene and graft copolymers and mixtures of polystyrene with polymerisate blends butadiene-acrylonitrile-copolymer blends (hard rubber) blends of ethylene and propylene, butylene, vinyl ester, and unsaturated aliphatic acids as well as salts and esters plasticizerfrec blends of methacrylic acid esters and acrylic acid esters with monofunctional saturated alcohols (Ci-C18) as well as blends of the esters of methacrylic acid butadiene and styrene as well as polymer blends of acrylic acid butyl ester and vinylpyrrolidone polyurethane manufactured from 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 1.4-butandiol and aliphatic polyesters from adipic acid and glycols. 

Polymers are used frequently in paints and varnishes. These materials are usually filled with opaque materials and are difficult to separate or analyze by other procedures. Pyrolysis can be used to identify the nature of the paint, to measure quantitatively residual monomers, for quality control, and to examine additives [5, 13, 14]. Paints may contain a variety of polymers and copolymers such as vinyl derivatives, polyurethanes, phthalate polyesters, etc. Varnishes may contain various copolymers, siloxanes, etc. and can have a complex composition. This composition can be successfully analyzed using analytical pyrolysis. For example, the composition of a coating material consisting of the terpolymer poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-butyl acrylate-co-ethyl methacrylate) crosslinked with butoxy melamine resin has been analyzed with excellent results based on various monomer ratios resulting from pyrolysis at 590° C [15]. 

Common matrix resins for blending with conducting polymers are widely used in traditional anticorrosion coatings, such as epoxy resin [25, 27, 32, 34, 68, 70, 71, 76], polyacrylic-based resin [24, 39, 48, 77, 78], and poly(methyl methacrylate) [30, 60, 62, 64]. The feature of matrix resin as well as the amount of ICPs is important to the anticorrosion performance of conductive composite coating. Samui and Phad-nis [67] blended various amounts of dioctyl phosphate (DOPH)-doped PANI with different polymeric matrices (epoxy resin, polyurethane resin, styrene-butyl acrylate... 

---