Acrylated epoxy system

In SIN formation, both timing and rates of polymerization to form the two networks are important. With an acrylate-epoxy system, it was found that simultaneous gelation produced materials with poorer properties than those formed by slightly mismatched polymerization rates (6). In another instance (7), polyurethane-poly(n-butyl methacrylate) SINs in which the acrylate was initiated photolytically at various times after the onset of polyurethane formation produced a series of materials, presumably with the same chemical composition, with an average particle size that decreased as the delay time to acrylic initiation increased. Damping properties of these materials changed systematically across the series. 

We have been investigating the effects of multifunctional monomers, rubber modification and light intensity upon both the rate and final degree of cure in acrylated epoxy systems. 

Acrylated epoxy systems undergo significant changes in thermomechanical properties on standing at room teinperature. Other studies have shown that free radicals are very long-lived in UV-cured systems kept under inert atmospheres, amd that polymerization can continue for extended periods due to the low mobility of the residual unsaturated species at higher conversions. In this study, however, the films were exposed to air immediately after irradiation, which should effectively quench the residue free radicals. 

Prepolymers. A broad range of acrylated resins (oligomers) are commercially available. The film-forming properties depend on the oligomer system. One of the most common is the acrylated epoxy system. In acrylated urethanes, an isocyanate-functional prepolymer with a polyol backbone can be reacted with a hydroxy-functional monomer (e.g., hydroxyethyl or hydroxypropyl acrylate). Many different resins can be synthesized by varying the polyol backbone, the isocyanate type, and the hydroxy-functional monomer. Polyester acrylates are another example of commercially important prepolymers. Acrylated acrylics have an acrylic backbone with pendant acrylate functionality. 

Silicone acrylate technology, while known since the 1970s [68], has been applied to release coatings more recently [69]. Both homopolymerization of multifunctional silicone acrylates and copolymerization with organic acrylates is practiced [22,70]. Examples of blended systems will be deferred to the next section, understanding that an increase in the non-silicone component acts to increase the release level, analogous to the epoxy system described above. 

Silicone acrylates (Fig. 5) are again lower molecular weight base polymers that contain multiple functional groups. As in epoxy systems, the ratio of PDMS to functional material governs properties of release, anchorage, transfer, cure speed, etc. Radiation induced radical cure can be initiated with either exposure of photo initiators and sensitizers to UV light [22,46,71 ] or by electron beam irradiation of the sample. 

Advantages are similar to the epoxy system, in that these can be solventless and do not require thermal energy. Disadvantages unique to this system, however, include the need to inert the cure chamber to avoid air-inhibition of cure as well as some release instability with acrylate adhesives [72]. 

Self-leveling epoxy, polyester or reactive acrylic resin systems 9/105... 

This task represents a continuation of efforts to maximize the hydrophobicity of acrylic, epoxy, and other polymeric systems for resistance to water penetration and environmental degradation, and to minimize the dielectric constant and improve the processability for adhesives and coatings, without compromising the necessary structural characteristics for materials used for, e.g., structural elements, liners, paints, and microelectronic devices. 

Fig. 3.8. Plots of interface bond strength, Tt, versus embedded fiber length, L. (a) for a carbon fiber-epoxy matrix system and (b) for a Hercules IM6 carbon fiber-acrylic matrix system. After Pilkethly and Doble (1990) and Desarmont and Favre (1991).

However, newer adhesives systems having moderate temperature resistance have been developed with improved toughness but without sacrificing other properties. When cured, these structural adhesives have discrete elastomeric particles embedded in the matrix. The most common toughened hybrids using this concept are acrylic and epoxy systems. The elastomer is generally a amine- or carboxyl-terminated acrylonitrile butadiene copolymer (ATBN and CTBN). 

There are numerous types of paint employed in the protection of steel and they are designed to meet the conditions imposed by the environment in which they are expected to function. For steel exposed to the atmosphere, the most common type of paint system is based on alkyl resin and this may be mixed with other types or may itself be chemically modified for a specific purpose, e.g. vinyl toluenated or styrenated to give rapid drying. Other generic types are chlorinated rubber, vinyl, acrylic, epoxy, and polyurethane. All have particular attributes and limitations and selection is usually a matter of discussion between user and supplier. 

Another development has been reported by P.A. Lucas, W.E. Stamer and S.G. Musselman of Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (Lucas et al., 1994). An acrylate functional urethane flexibiliser has been used to modify epoxy resin, which optimises reactivity and is more compatible with epoxy. Urethane-acrylate flexibiliser offers very tough hybrid epoxy systems meeting the more demanding requirements of civil engineering applications. 

Additives and comonomers in thermoset, moisture, UV, and catalytically curing resins or coatings (e.g., acrylic, epoxy, melamine, and unsaturated polyester systems)... 

They are typically applied as adhesive sealants in bodywork manufacturing (fold bonding and flange bonding, vibration insulation, corrosion protection) and as sealants in bottle and glass caps. For environmental reasons (hydrochloric acid separation in the case of thermal disposal), PVC plastisols are increasingly being replaced by acrylate-plastisols and epoxy systems. 

There are strengths and weaknesses among the various acrylic thermosetting systems. For example, acid epoxies and urethane cross-linked systems produce no volatile byproducts. Cure temperatures differ widely (see Table VIII). These and other factors determine the acceptability of a particular system for a given application and allow the user considerable latitude in choosing an acrylic that best meets his requirements. 

---